Citing references

Anderson v. Divris, 138 F.4th 625, 636 (1st Cir. 2025) (second alteration in original) (quoting Magwood v. Patterson, 561 U.S. 320, 335 (2010)). AEDPA's bar applies even to claims that could not have been raised in a prior petition. See id.

Divris, 138 F.4th 625, 636 (1st Cir. 2025) (explaining that “a claim in a later-filed petition based on newly discovered evidence” is “plainly barred” unless the claim goes to the petitioner’s actual innocence).

Divris, 138 F.4th 625 , 630–37, 640–41 (1st Cir. 2025) (holding that a district court should have dismissed a habeas petition as “a second or successive habeas corpus application” as opposed to denying the petition pursuant to § 2244(b)(2)). 5 Therefore