TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Citing references

Opinions citing Poe v. Ullman, 367 U.S. 497 (1961)

921 citing cases

Negative treatment
Depth Newest Oldest Most cited
Majority opinions only
1 2–3 4–9 10+ times cited
  1. Washington v. Glucksberg
    521 U.S. 702 Supreme CourtJune 26, 1997

    Poe v. Ullman, 367 U. S. 497, 543 (1961) (Harlan, J., dissenting).

  2. Rosen v. Louisiana State Board of Medical Examiners
    318 F. Supp. 1217 E.D. LouisianaAugust 7, 1970

    Justice Harlan, dissenting, Poe v. Ullman, 367 U.S. 497, 547 , 81 S.Ct. 1752, 1779 , 6 L.Ed.2d 989 (1961).

  3. Little v. Strange
    796 F. Supp. 2d 1314 M.D. AlabamaJune 21, 2011

    Poe v.

  4. Aldo Mario Lovisi and Margaret Lovisi v. A. E. Slayton, Jr., Superintendent, Leake Parrish, Superintendent
    539 F.2d 349 Fourth CircuitMay 12, 1976 Dissent

    In his dissenting opinion in Poe v. Ullman, 367 U.S. 497 , 81 S.Ct. 1752 , 6 L.Ed.2d 989 (1961), Mr.

  5. Jegley v. Picado
    80 S.W.3d 332 Supreme Court of ArkansasJuly 5, 2002

    Ullman, 367 U.S. 497 , 81 S.Ct. 1752 , 6 L.Ed.2d 989 (1961).

  6. Obergefell v. Hodges
    576 U.S. 644 Supreme CourtJune 26, 2015

    Poe v. Ullman, 367 U.S. 497 , 542, 81 S.Ct. 1752 , 6 L.Ed.2d 989 (1961) (Harlan, J., dissenting).

  7. People v. Kevorkian
    527 N.W.2d 714 Michigan Supreme CourtDecember 13, 1994

    v Ullman, 367 US 497, 543 ; 81 S Ct 1752 ; 6 L Ed 2d 989 (1961) (Harlan, J., dissenting).

  8. Young Women's Christian Ass'n of Princeton, NJ v. Kugler
    342 F. Supp. 1048 D. New JerseyFebruary 29, 1972

    [97] Poe v. Ullman, 367 U.S. 497, 544 , 81 S.Ct. 1752, 1777 (1961) (dissenting). [98] 71 Cal.2d 954 , 80 Cal.Rptr. 354, 359-360 , 458 P.2d 194, 199-200 (1969).

  9. Dawson v. Vance
    329 F. Supp. 1320 S.D. TexasJuly 29, 1971

    See also: Poe v. Ullman, 367 U.S. 497, 502-507 , 81 S.Ct. 1752 , 6 L.Ed. 2d 989 ; compare: Baker v.

  10. Compassion in Dying v. Washington
    79 F.3d 790 Ninth CircuitMarch 6, 1996 Dissent

    It has been suggested that Poe v. Ullman, 367 U.S. 497 , 81 S.Ct. 1752 , 6 L.Ed.2d 989 *844 (1961) might control the ripeness inquiry in this case. Poe does not apply here.

  11. Buchanan v. Batchelor
    308 F. Supp. 729 N.D. TexasJanuary 21, 1970

    The defendants point to the case of Poe v. Ullman, 367 U.S. 497 , 81 S.Ct. 1752 , 6 L.Ed.2d 989 (1961), as authority for holding that the Gibsons have no standing to bring this action for injunc-tive relief.

  12. Compassion In Dying v. State Of Washington
    79 F.3d 790 Ninth CircuitMay 28, 1996

    This is a ripe and justiciable controversy. 242 It has been suggested that Poe v. Ullman, 367 U.S. 497 , 81 S.Ct. 1752 , 6 L.Ed.2d 989 (1961) might control the ripeness inquiry in this case. Poe does not apply here.

  13. San Francisco County Democratic Central Committee v. Eu
    826 F.2d 814 Ninth CircuitAugust 18, 1987

    Relying on Poe v. Ullman, 367 U.S. 497 , 81 S.Ct. 1752 , 6 L.Ed.2d 989 (1961), the State claims that the action is not justiciable because the Elections Code provisions that plaintiffs challenge have never been enforced.

  14. Schochet v. State
    541 A.2d 183 Court of Special Appeals of MarylandMay 19, 1988

    Although the constitutional right to privacy was first recognized in 1965, the harbinger appeared four years earlier in the dissenting opinion of Justice Harlan in Poe v. Ullman, 367 U.S. 497 , 81 S.Ct. 1752 , 6 L.Ed.2d 989 (1961).

  15. San Francisco County Democratic Central Committee v. March Fong Eu
    792 F.2d 802 Ninth CircuitJune 18, 1986

    Relying on Poe v. Ullman, 367 U.S. 497 , 81 S.Ct. 1752 , 6 L.Ed.2d 989 (1961), the Secretary claims that the action is not justiciable because the Elections Code provisions that plaintiffs challenge have never been enforced.

  16. Doe v. Commonwealth's Atty. for City of Richmond
    403 F. Supp. 1199 E.D. VirginiaOctober 24, 1975

    Justice Harlan's dissenting statement in Poe v. Ullman, 367 U.S. 497, 553 , 81 S.

  17. International Society For Krishna Consciousness Of Atlanta v. Eaves
    601 F.2d 809 Fifth CircuitAugust 30, 1979

    Poe v. Ullman, 367 U.S. 497 , 81 S.Ct. 1752 , 6 L.Ed.2d 689 (1961), which seems irreconcilable with Epperson , in fact supports this conclusion.

  18. Saint Paul Area Chamber of Commerce v. Gaertner
    439 F.3d 481 Eighth CircuitFebruary 27, 2006

    Ullman, 367 U.S. 497 , 81 S.Ct. 1752 , 6 L.Ed.2d 989 (1961). In Poe , the Supreme Court ruled that "the mere existence of a state penal statute" is insufficient to support standing "if real threat of enforcement is wanting." Id. at 507 , 81 S.Ct. 1752 .

  19. Causeway Medical Suite v. Ieyoub
    109 F.3d 1096 Fifth CircuitApril 14, 1997 Concurrence

    Ullman, 367 U.S. 497, 542 , 81 S.Ct. 1752, 1776 , 6 L.Ed.2d 989 (1961) (Harlan, J., dissenting), and that the doctrine’s “boundaries are not susceptible of expression as a simple rule.” Casey, 505 U.S. at 849 , 112 S.Ct. at 2806 .

  20. Griswold v. Connecticut
    381 U.S. 479 Supreme CourtJune 7, 1965

    Poe *494 v. Ullman, 367 U. S. 497, 517 (dissenting opinion of MR.

  21. Rincon Band of Mission Indians v. County of San Diego
    495 F.2d 1 Ninth CircuitMarch 18, 1974

    Similar threats in Poe v.

  22. Lewis v. Tully
    99 F.R.D. 632 N.D. IllinoisOctober 31, 1983

    In Poe v.

  23. Blyden v. Hogan
    320 F. Supp. 513 S.D. New YorkNovember 30, 1970

    Relying on such cases as Poe v. Ullman, 367 U.S. 497 , 81 S.Ct. 1752 , 6 L.E.2d 989 (1961), and Tileston v.

  24. Population Services International v. Wilson
    398 F. Supp. 321 S.D. New YorkJuly 2, 1975

    Connecticut, supra, 381 U.S. at 500, 85 S.Ct. 1678 (Harlan, J., concurring); Poe v. Ullman, supra, 367 U.S. at 542-45 , 81 S. Ct. 1752 (Harlan, J., dissenting from dismissal of appeal).

  25. American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee v. Meese
    714 F. Supp. 1060 C.D. CaliforniaAugust 31, 1989

    Thompson, 415 U.S. 452, 459 , 94 S.Ct. 1209, 1215-16 , 39 L.Ed.2d 505 (1974), or “chimerical,” Poe v. Ullman, 367 U.S. 497, 508 , 81 S.Ct. 1752, 1758 , 6 L.Ed.2d 989 (1961).

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list