TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Citing references

Opinions citing Carrington v. Rash, 380 U.S. 89 (1965)

562 citing cases

Negative treatment
Depth Newest Oldest Most cited
Majority opinions only
1 2–3 4–9 10+ times cited
  1. Wilson v. Symm
    341 F. Supp. 8 S.D. TexasMarch 29, 1972

    Carrington v. Rash, 380 U.S. 89, 96 [ 85 S.Ct. 775, 780 , 13 L.Ed.2d 675 (1965)].

  2. Casarez v. Val Verde County
    957 F. Supp. 847 W.D. TexasJanuary 24, 1997

    Carrington v. Rash, 380 U.S. 89, 96 [ 85 S.Ct. 775, 780 , 13 L.Ed.2d 675 ] (1965).

  3. Kramer v. Union Free School District No. 15
    282 F. Supp. 70 E.D. New YorkJanuary 30, 1968

    Carrington v. Rash, 380 U.S. 89 , 85 S.Ct. 775 , 13 L. Ed.2d 675 (1965).

  4. Whittington v. Board of Elections
    320 F. Supp. 889 N.D. New YorkDecember 8, 1970

    In Carrington v.

  5. Auerbach v. Kinley
    499 F. Supp. 1329 N.D. New YorkOctober 9, 1980

    First, that the Supreme Court gave at least tacit approval to similar statutory treatment of prospective student voters in Carrington v. Rash, 380 U.S. 89 , 85 S.Ct. 775 , 13 L.Ed.2d 675 (1965).

  6. Socialist Labor Party v. Rhodes
    290 F. Supp. 983 S.D. OhioAugust 29, 1968

    Carrington v. Rash, 380 U.S. 89, 94 , 85 S.Ct. 775, 779 , 13 L.Ed.2d 675 (1965), and see State ex rel. Beck v. Hummel, 150 Ohio St. 127 , 80 N.E.2d 899 (1948).

  7. Ramey v. Rockefeller
    348 F. Supp. 780 E.D. New YorkOctober 3, 1972

    Carrington v. Rash, 380 U.S. 89, 95 , 85 S.Ct. 775, 779 , 13 L.Ed.2d 675 (1965).

  8. Marilyn Whatley and Carol Gerber v. T. J. Clark, Etc., Emma Maria Garza
    482 F.2d 1230 Fifth CircuitAugust 29, 1973

    Carrington v. Rash, 380 U.S. 89 , 85 S.Ct. 775 , 13 L.Ed.2d 675 (1965). Indeed, such a restriction “may be necessary to preserve the basic conception of a political community. . . .”

  9. Lloyd v. Babb
    251 S.E.2d 843 Supreme Court of North CarolinaFebruary 5, 1979

    These cases begin with Carrington v. Rash, 380 U.S. 89 (1965).

  10. Ohio Organizing Collaborative v. Husted
    189 F. Supp. 3d 708 S.D. OhioMay 24, 2016

    In support, they argue that those Amendments prohibit discrimination on the basis of partisan affiliation or viewpoint, citing Carrington v. Rash, 380 U.S. 89 , 85 S.Ct. 775 , 13 L.Ed.2d 675 (1965) and Justice Kennedy’s concurrence in Vieth v.

  11. Castro v. State of California
    466 P.2d 244 California Supreme CourtMarch 24, 1970

    (See, e.g., Carrington v. Rash, supra, 380 U.S. 89, 96 [ 13 L.Ed.2d 675, 680 ]: “close to the core of our constitutional system”; Reynolds v.

  12. Worden v. Mercer County Board of Elections
    294 A.2d 233 Supreme Court of New JerseyJuly 14, 1972

    Ed. 2d 647 (1969) ; Carrington v. Rash, 380 U. S. 89 , 85 S. Ct. 775 , 13 L. Ed. 2d 675 (1965).

  13. Clydie Marie Perry v. Grenada Municipal Separate School District
    300 F. Supp. 748 N.D. MississippiJune 20, 1969

    A similar unrelenting rule was struck down by the Supreme Court in Carrington v. Rash, 380 U.S. 89 , 85 S.Ct. 775 , 13 L.Ed.2d 675, 1965 .

  14. Levy v. Scranton
    780 F. Supp. 897 N.D. New YorkDecember 20, 1991

    Rash, 380 U.S. 89 , 85 S.Ct. 775 , 13 L.Ed.2d 675 (1965); see also Evans v. Cornman, 398 U.S. 419 , 90 S.Ct. 1752 , 26 L.Ed.2d 370 (1970). Section 5-104(2) is neutral on its face.

  15. Thurston v. Greco
    474 P.2d 881 Washington Supreme CourtSeptember 24, 1970

    The court in Carrington v. Rash, 380 U.S. 89, 94 , 13 L.Ed.2d 675 , 85 S.Ct. 775 (1965), struck at the heart of all impermissible discrimination which excludes certain groups from the franchise.

  16. United States v. State of Texas
    422 F. Supp. 917 S.D. TexasNovember 3, 1976

    *920 Defendants argue that Carrington v. Rash, 380 U.S. 89 , 85 S.Ct. 775 , 13 L.Ed.2d 675 (1965), Wilson v. Symm, 341 F.Supp. 8 (S.D.Tex.1972), and Ballas v.

  17. Dunn v. Blumstein
    405 U.S. 330 Supreme CourtMarch 21, 1972

    S. 663, 667 (1966); Carrington v. Rash, 380 U. S. 89, 93-94 (1965); Reynolds v. Sims, supra . This "equal right to vote," Evans v.

  18. Oregon v. Mitchell
    400 U.S. 112 Supreme CourtDecember 21, 1970

    In Carrington v. Rash, 380 U. S. 89 , we held that Texas could not bar a person, otherwise qualified, from voting merely because he was a member of the armed services.

  19. Starns v. Malkerson
    326 F. Supp. 234 D. MinnesotaSeptember 22, 1970

    Carrington v. Rash, 380 U.S. 89, 92 , 85 S.Ct. 775, 778 , 13 L.Ed.2d 675 (1965).

  20. Joseph A. Bell v. Christopher M. Marinko
    367 F.3d 588 Sixth CircuitApril 28, 2004

    Dist., 395 U.S. 621, 625 , 89 S.Ct. 1886 , 23 L.Ed.2d 583 (1969); Carrington v. Rash, 380 U.S. 89, 91 , 85 S.Ct. 775 , 13 L.Ed.2d 675 (1965).

  21. Calvin v. Jefferson County Board of Commissioners
    172 F. Supp. 3d 1292 N.D. FloridaMarch 19, 2016

    In Burns , the Court cited Carrington v. Rash, 380 U.S. 89 , 85 S.Ct. 775 , 13 L.Ed.2d 675 (1965), as a case containing an example of a “choice the Constitution forbids,” and discussed that same case in a footnote. See Burns, 384 U.S. at 92 , 86 S.Ct. 1286 .

  22. Newburger v. Peterson
    344 F. Supp. 559 D. New HampshireJune 8, 1972

    Rash, 380 U.S. 89, 94-95 , 85 S.Ct. 775 , 13 L.Ed.2d 675 (1965); Evans v. Cornman, 398 U.S. 419, 421 , 90 S.Ct. 1752 , 26 L.Ed.2d 370 (1970); and Dunn v. Blumstein, supra, 92 S.Ct. 1007 n. 22.

  23. Lee v. Virginia State Board of Elections
    155 F. Supp. 3d 572 E.D. VirginiaDecember 18, 2015

    Rash, 380 U.S. 89, 91 , 85 S.Ct. 775 , 13 L.Ed.2d 675 (1965)). The allocation of resources, personnel, and facilities for voting is best left to the states.

  24. Auerbach v. Kinley
    594 F. Supp. 1503 N.D. New YorkOctober 10, 1984

    Cornman, 398 U.S. 419 , 90 S.Ct. 1752 , 26 L.Ed.2d 370 (1970); Carrington v. Rash, 380 U.S. 89 , 85 S.Ct. 775 , 13 L.Ed.2d 675 (1965). A.

  25. Stapleton v. Clerk for City of Inkster
    311 F. Supp. 1187 E.D. MichiganApril 29, 1970

    See Carrington v. Rash, supra, 380 U.S. 89, at 96 , 85 S.Ct. 775 at 780 [, 13 L.Ed.2d 675 ].

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list