TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Citing references

Opinions citing Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (1968)

32,264 citing cases

Negative treatment
Depth Newest Oldest Most cited
Majority opinions only
1 2–3 4–9 10+ times cited
  1. United States v. Paul Askew
    482 F.3d 532 D.C. CircuitApril 6, 2007

    Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 22 , 88 S.Ct. 1868 , 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968).

  2. Womack v. United States
    673 A.2d 603 District of Columbia Court of AppealsMarch 14, 1996

    Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 , 88 S.Ct. 1868 , 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968), rather than a full arrest. We agree and affirm. *606 I.

  3. Michigan v. Long
    463 U.S. 1032 Supreme CourtJuly 6, 1983

    In Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.

  4. State v. Lund
    573 A.2d 1376 Supreme Court of New JerseyMay 23, 1990

    Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 27 , 88 S.Ct. 1868, 1883 , 20 L.Ed. 2d 889, 909 (1968).

  5. United States v. Sharpe
    470 U.S. 675 Supreme CourtMarch 20, 1985

    In Terry v. Ohio, 392 U. S. 1 (1968), we adopted a dual inquiry for evaluating the reasonableness of an investigative stop.

  6. State v. Wheeler
    737 P.2d 1005 Washington Supreme CourtJune 4, 1987

    I Defendant concedes the police had sufficient grounds for an investigative detention, or Terry stop. See Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 , 20 L.Ed.2d 889 , 88 S.Ct. 1868 (1968).

  7. United States v. Brown, Rocky
    334 F.3d 1161 D.C. CircuitJuly 22, 2003

    Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 , 88 S.Ct. 1868 , 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968), is inapplicable.

  8. Ransome v. State
    816 A.2d 901 Court of Appeals of MarylandFebruary 14, 2003

    See Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 21, 27 , 88 S.Ct. 1868, 1880, 1883 , 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968).

  9. United States v. Place
    462 U.S. 696 Supreme CourtJune 20, 1983

    . *700 Applying the standard of Terry v. Ohio, 392 U. S. 1 (1968), to the detention of personal property, it concluded that detention of the bags could be justified if based on reasonable suspicion to believe that the bags contained narcotics.

  10. Commonwealth v. Hicks, M., Aplt.
    208 A.3d 916 Supreme Court of PennsylvaniaMay 31, 2019

    Ohio , 392 U.S. 1 , 88 S.Ct. 1868 , 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968), the Supreme Court of the United States has approved of "stop and frisk" practices as a limited departure from the requirement of probable cause and the necessity of warrants for searches and seizures.

  11. United States v. Robert S. Wylie
    569 F.2d 62 D.C. CircuitMarch 27, 1978

    Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 , 88 S.Ct. 1868 , 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968); and, second, that the re-entry into the bank constituted an arrest without probable cause, or, alternatively, an unwarranted extension of the Terry stop after the original grounds for suspicion had vanished

  12. United States v. Askew
    529 F.3d 1119 D.C. CircuitJune 20, 2008

    Wolfish, 441 U.S. 520, 559 , 99 S.Ct. 1861 , 60 L.Ed.2d 447 (1979); Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 20-22 , 88 S.Ct. 1868 , 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968).

  13. Floyd v. City of New York
    959 F. Supp. 2d 540 S.D. New YorkAugust 12, 2013

    IV; Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 , 88 S.Ct. 1868 , 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968). . See generally U.S. Const, amend. XIV § 1; Whren v. United States, 517 U.S. 806, 813 , 116 S.Ct. 1769 , 135 L.Ed.2d 89 (1996). . District of Columbia v.

  14. State v. Taveras
    39 A.3d 638 Supreme Court of Rhode IslandMarch 22, 2012

    I find no fault with the stop and accept the factual findings of the trial justice that justified a frisk of the defendant, pursuant to Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 , 88 S.Ct. 1868 , 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968).

  15. Reid v. State
    51 A.3d 597 Court of Appeals of MarylandAugust 24, 2012 Dissent

    Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 9 , 88 S.Ct. 1868, 1873 , 20 L.Ed.2d 889, 899 (1968).

  16. United States v. Jose Antonio Casado
    303 F.3d 440 Second CircuitSeptember 12, 2002

    Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 , 88 S.Ct. 1868 , 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968). 1 We agree with Casado’s argument that the search was excessive in scope.

  17. State v. Kennedy
    726 P.2d 445 Washington Supreme CourtOctober 16, 1986

    Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 , 20 L.Ed.2d 889 , 88 S.Ct. 1868 (1968); State v.

  18. Bradley Leroy Thompson v. State
    Tex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)June 4, 2015

    Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 22 , 88 S. Ct. 1868 , 20 L. Ed. 2d 889 (1968).

  19. United States v. Bailey
    743 F.3d 322 Second CircuitFebruary 21, 2014

    Further, and as relevant here, the- district court held that Bailey’s brief detention was independently supported by reasonable suspicion of his criminal conduct and, therefore, lawful under Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 , 88 S.Ct. 1868 . See id.

  20. United States v. Orson G
    648 F.2d 29 D.C. CircuitApril 10, 1981 Dissent

    The seminal Supreme Court case discussing seizures, Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 , 88 5.

  21. State v. Flowers
    734 N.W.2d 239 Supreme Court of MinnesotaJune 28, 2007

    Here we address the permissible scope of a Terry stop, a concept that is drawn from the federal constitution. See Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 , 88 S.Ct. 1868 , 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968). That the U.S.

  22. People v. Hyde
    524 P.2d 830 California Supreme CourtJuly 25, 1974

    {Terry v. Ohio, supra, 392 U.S. 1, 20 .)

  23. State v. Jenkins
    3 A.3d 806 Supreme Court of ConnecticutSeptember 7, 2010

    As both the majority and the state properly recognize, the reasonableness of traffic stops under the fourth amendment is analyzed under the framework established in Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 , 88 S.Ct. 1868 , 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968). See Arizona v.

  24. Williamson v. United States
    607 A.2d 471 District of Columbia Court of AppealsApril 21, 1992

    " [3] Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 , 88 S.Ct. 1868 , 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968).

  25. United States v. Lemons
    153 F. Supp. 2d 948 E.D. WisconsinJuly 30, 2001

    Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 , 88 S.Ct. 1868 , 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968). Magistrate Judge Aaron E. Goodstein held an evidentiary hearing on the motion and then recommended denial. I will adopt the recommendation in part, and on different grounds.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list