Citing references
Opinions citing Samuels v. Mackell, Dist. Attorney of Queens Cnty., 401 U.S. 66 (1971)
949 citing cases
-
559 F.2d 642 D.C. CircuitJune 6, 1977
Compare Samuels v. Mackell, 401 U.S. 66, 73 , 91 S.Ct. 764 , 27 L.Ed.2d 688 (1971).
-
650 F.3d 1007 Third CircuitJune 21, 2011
A companion case, Samuels v. Mackell, 401 U.S. 66 , 91 S.Ct. 764 , 27 L.Ed.2d 688 (1971), recognized that allowing declaratory judgments in such cases would largely undermine Younger 's holding.
-
448 F. Supp. 306 N.D. OhioOctober 31, 1977
Mackell, 401 U.S. 66, 75-76 , 91 S.Ct. 764 , 27 L.Ed.2d 688 (Brennan, White, Marshall, JJ.) (1971); Dyson v.
-
415 U.S. 452 Supreme CourtMarch 19, 1974
S. 293 (1943), and Samuels v. Mackell, 401 U. S. 66 (1971).
-
381 F.3d 965 Ninth CircuitSeptember 3, 2004
The federal plaintiffs in Samuels v. Mackell, 401 U.S. 66 , 91 S.Ct. 764 , 27 L.Ed.2d 688 (1971), sought a declaration that the state statute under which they were being prosecuted was unconstitutional.
-
516 F. Supp. 2d 1021 D. NebraskaSeptember 25, 2007
Samuels v. Mackell, 401 U.S. 66 , 91 S.Ct. 764 , 27 L.Ed.2d 688 (1971).
-
463 F.2d 63 Third CircuitJune 27, 1972
Harris, 401 U.S. 37 , 91 S.Ct. 746 , 27 L.Ed.2d 669 (1971); Samuels v. Mackell, 401 U.S. 66 , 91 S.Ct. 764 , 27 L.Ed.2d 688 (1971); Boyle v.
-
109 Fed. Cl. 369 Federal ClaimsMarch 4, 2013
Mackell, 401 U.S. 66, 72 , 91 S.Ct. 764 , 27 L.Ed.2d 688 (1971)— declaratory relief that would accomplish the same result as an injunction must meet that higher standard. See id.
-
346 F. Supp. 1050 S.D. IowaAugust 12, 1972
Harris, 401 U.S. 37 , 91 S.Ct. 746 , 27 L.Ed.2d 669 (1971), and Samuels v. Mackell, 401 U.S. 66 , 91 S.Ct. 764 , 27 L.Ed.2d 688 (1971), as providing "weighty precedent" for abstention. Lake Carrier's Ass'n v.
-
382 F.3d 295 Third CircuitSeptember 2, 2004
Mackell, 401 U.S. 66, 73-74 , 91 S.Ct. 764 , 27 L.Ed.2d 688 (1971), concluded that the same comity and federalism principles preclude federal courts from reaching the merits of a declaratory judgment action.
-
342 F. Supp. 1048 D. New JerseyFebruary 29, 1972
[39] 401 U.S. 66, 73 , 91 S.Ct. 764, 768 , 27 L.Ed.2d 688 (1971). [40] The other cases decided the same day, note 37 supra, illustrate the application of the principles set out in Younger and Samuels .
-
334 F. Supp. 1203 D. ConnecticutNovember 9, 1971
Ct. 746 , 27 L.Ed.2d 669 (1971) and Samuels v. Mackell, 401 U.S. 66 , 91 S.Ct. 764 , 27 L.Ed.2d 688 (1971), I also dissent on the issue of jurisdiction.
-
629 F.2d 1127 Fifth CircuitNovember 7, 1980
Samuels v. Mackell, 401 U.S. 66, 73 , 91 S.Ct. 764, 768 , 27 L.Ed.2d 688 (1971).
-
447 F.2d 596 Ninth CircuitAugust 13, 1971
Landry, 401 U.S. 77 , 91 S.Ct. 758 , 27 L.Ed.2d 696 (1971) ; Samuels v. Mackell, 401 U.S. 66 , 91 S.Ct. 764 , 27 L.Ed.2d 688 (1971).
-
359 F. Supp. 370 E.D. VirginiaJune 6, 1973
Justice Brennan states that the Mackell rule (Samuels v. Mackell, 401 U.S. 66 , 91 S.Ct. 764 , 27 L.
-
458 F.2d 1205 Second CircuitApril 12, 1972
See Samuels v. Mackell, 401 U.S. 66 , 91 S.Ct. 764 , 27 L.Ed.2d 688 (1971) 3 Erdmann's argument that this is an administrative, not judicial, proceeding is thus wide of the mark.
-
446 F.2d 1343 Third CircuitSeptember 28, 1971
Harris, 401 U.S. 37 , 91 S.Ct. 746 , 27 L.Ed.2d 669 (1971); Samuels v. Mackell, 401 U.S. 66 , 91 S.Ct. 764 , 27 L.Ed.2d 688 (1971); Boyle v. Landry, 401 U.S. 77 , 91 S.Ct. 758 , 27 L.Ed.2d 696 (1971); Perez v.
-
83 F. Supp. 3d 635 D. MarylandFebruary 3, 2015
(quoting Samuels v. Mackell, 401 U.S. 66, 73 , 91 S.Ct. 764 , 27 L.Ed.2d 688 (1971)).
-
477 F.2d 1073 Third CircuitMay 8, 1973
Harris, 401 U.S. 37 , 91 S.Ct. 746 , 27 L.Ed.2d 669 (1971); Samuels v. Mackell, 401 U.S. 66 , 91 S.Ct. 764 , 27 L. Ed.2d 688 (1971); Boyle v. Landry, 401 U.S. 77 , 91 S.Ct. 758 , 27 L.Ed.2d 696 (1971); Perez v.
-
716 A.2d 50 Supreme Court of ConnecticutJuly 28, 1998
Ed. 2d 664 [1971], and Samuels v. Mackell, 401 U.S. 66, 73 , 91 S. Ct. 764 , 27 L.
-
555 F.2d 63 Third CircuitMarch 9, 1977
Harris, supra; Samuels v. Mackell, 401 U.S. 66 , 91 S.Ct. 764 , 27 L.Ed.2d 688 (1971); Boyle v. Landry, 401 U.S. 77 , 91 S.Ct. 758 , 27 L.Ed.2d 696 (1971); Perez v. Ledesma, 401 U.S. 82 , 91 S.Ct. 674 , 27 L.Ed.2d 701 (1971); Dyson v.
-
479 F.2d 1176 Fifth CircuitAugust 6, 1973
Samuels v. Mackell, 1971, 401 U.S. 66 , 91 S.Ct. 764 , 27 L.
-
362 F. Supp. 88 S.D. New YorkJuly 25, 1973
Harris, 401 U.S. 37 , 91 S.Ct. 746 , 27 L.Ed.2d 669 (1971); Samuels v. Mackell, 401 U.S. 66 , 91 S.Ct. 764 , 27 L.Ed.2d 688 (1971).
-
503 F.2d 631 Fourth CircuitOctober 1, 1974
Samuels v. Mackell, 401 U.S. 66, 72 , 91 S.Ct. 764, 767 , 27 L.Ed.2d 688 (1971).
-
447 F.2d 596 Ninth CircuitOctober 13, 1971
Landry, 401 U.S. 77 , 91 S.Ct. 758 , 27 L.Ed.2d 696 (1971); Samuels v. Machell, 401 U.S. 66 , 91 S.Ct. 764 , 27 L.Ed.2d 688 (1971)