TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Citing references

Opinions citing Samuels v. Mackell, Dist. Attorney of Queens Cnty., 401 U.S. 66 (1971)

949 citing cases

  1. 559 F.2d 642 D.C. CircuitJune 6, 1977

    Compare Samuels v. Mackell, 401 U.S. 66, 73 , 91 S.Ct. 764 , 27 L.Ed.2d 688 (1971).

  2. Alli v. Decker
    650 F.3d 1007 Third CircuitJune 21, 2011

    A companion case, Samuels v. Mackell, 401 U.S. 66 , 91 S.Ct. 764 , 27 L.Ed.2d 688 (1971), recognized that allowing declaratory judgments in such cases would largely undermine Younger 's holding.

  3. 448 F. Supp. 306 N.D. OhioOctober 31, 1977

    Mackell, 401 U.S. 66, 75-76 , 91 S.Ct. 764 , 27 L.Ed.2d 688 (Brennan, White, Marshall, JJ.) (1971); Dyson v.

  4. 415 U.S. 452 Supreme CourtMarch 19, 1974

    S. 293 (1943), and Samuels v. Mackell, 401 U. S. 66 (1971).

  5. 381 F.3d 965 Ninth CircuitSeptember 3, 2004

    The federal plaintiffs in Samuels v. Mackell, 401 U.S. 66 , 91 S.Ct. 764 , 27 L.Ed.2d 688 (1971), sought a declaration that the state statute under which they were being prosecuted was unconstitutional.

  6. 516 F. Supp. 2d 1021 D. NebraskaSeptember 25, 2007

    Samuels v. Mackell, 401 U.S. 66 , 91 S.Ct. 764 , 27 L.Ed.2d 688 (1971).

  7. 463 F.2d 63 Third CircuitJune 27, 1972

    Harris, 401 U.S. 37 , 91 S.Ct. 746 , 27 L.Ed.2d 669 (1971); Samuels v. Mackell, 401 U.S. 66 , 91 S.Ct. 764 , 27 L.Ed.2d 688 (1971); Boyle v.

  8. 109 Fed. Cl. 369 Federal ClaimsMarch 4, 2013

    Mackell, 401 U.S. 66, 72 , 91 S.Ct. 764 , 27 L.Ed.2d 688 (1971)— declaratory relief that would accomplish the same result as an injunction must meet that higher standard. See id.

  9. 346 F. Supp. 1050 S.D. IowaAugust 12, 1972

    Harris, 401 U.S. 37 , 91 S.Ct. 746 , 27 L.Ed.2d 669 (1971), and Samuels v. Mackell, 401 U.S. 66 , 91 S.Ct. 764 , 27 L.Ed.2d 688 (1971), as providing "weighty precedent" for abstention. Lake Carrier's Ass'n v.

  10. 382 F.3d 295 Third CircuitSeptember 2, 2004

    Mackell, 401 U.S. 66, 73-74 , 91 S.Ct. 764 , 27 L.Ed.2d 688 (1971), concluded that the same comity and federalism principles preclude federal courts from reaching the merits of a declaratory judgment action.

  11. 342 F. Supp. 1048 D. New JerseyFebruary 29, 1972

    [39] 401 U.S. 66, 73 , 91 S.Ct. 764, 768 , 27 L.Ed.2d 688 (1971). [40] The other cases decided the same day, note 37 supra, illustrate the application of the principles set out in Younger and Samuels .

  12. Thoms v. Smith
    334 F. Supp. 1203 D. ConnecticutNovember 9, 1971

    Ct. 746 , 27 L.Ed.2d 669 (1971) and Samuels v. Mackell, 401 U.S. 66 , 91 S.Ct. 764 , 27 L.Ed.2d 688 (1971), I also dissent on the issue of jurisdiction.

  13. 629 F.2d 1127 Fifth CircuitNovember 7, 1980

    Samuels v. Mackell, 401 U.S. 66, 73 , 91 S.Ct. 764, 768 , 27 L.Ed.2d 688 (1971).

  14. Kinney v. Lenon
    447 F.2d 596 Ninth CircuitAugust 13, 1971

    Landry, 401 U.S. 77 , 91 S.Ct. 758 , 27 L.Ed.2d 696 (1971) ; Samuels v. Mackell, 401 U.S. 66 , 91 S.Ct. 764 , 27 L.Ed.2d 688 (1971).

  15. Rakes v. Coleman
    359 F. Supp. 370 E.D. VirginiaJune 6, 1973

    Justice Brennan states that the Mackell rule (Samuels v. Mackell, 401 U.S. 66 , 91 S.Ct. 764 , 27 L.

  16. 458 F.2d 1205 Second CircuitApril 12, 1972

    See Samuels v. Mackell, 401 U.S. 66 , 91 S.Ct. 764 , 27 L.Ed.2d 688 (1971) 3 Erdmann's argument that this is an administrative, not judicial, proceeding is thus wide of the mark.

  17. 446 F.2d 1343 Third CircuitSeptember 28, 1971

    Harris, 401 U.S. 37 , 91 S.Ct. 746 , 27 L.Ed.2d 669 (1971); Samuels v. Mackell, 401 U.S. 66 , 91 S.Ct. 764 , 27 L.Ed.2d 688 (1971); Boyle v. Landry, 401 U.S. 77 , 91 S.Ct. 758 , 27 L.Ed.2d 696 (1971); Perez v.

  18. 83 F. Supp. 3d 635 D. MarylandFebruary 3, 2015

    (quoting Samuels v. Mackell, 401 U.S. 66, 73 , 91 S.Ct. 764 , 27 L.Ed.2d 688 (1971)).

  19. 477 F.2d 1073 Third CircuitMay 8, 1973

    Harris, 401 U.S. 37 , 91 S.Ct. 746 , 27 L.Ed.2d 669 (1971); Samuels v. Mackell, 401 U.S. 66 , 91 S.Ct. 764 , 27 L. Ed.2d 688 (1971); Boyle v. Landry, 401 U.S. 77 , 91 S.Ct. 758 , 27 L.Ed.2d 696 (1971); Perez v.

  20. Drumm v. Brown
    716 A.2d 50 Supreme Court of ConnecticutJuly 28, 1998

    Ed. 2d 664 [1971], and Samuels v. Mackell, 401 U.S. 66, 73 , 91 S. Ct. 764 , 27 L.

  21. 555 F.2d 63 Third CircuitMarch 9, 1977

    Harris, supra; Samuels v. Mackell, 401 U.S. 66 , 91 S.Ct. 764 , 27 L.Ed.2d 688 (1971); Boyle v. Landry, 401 U.S. 77 , 91 S.Ct. 758 , 27 L.Ed.2d 696 (1971); Perez v. Ledesma, 401 U.S. 82 , 91 S.Ct. 674 , 27 L.Ed.2d 701 (1971); Dyson v.

  22. 479 F.2d 1176 Fifth CircuitAugust 6, 1973

    Samuels v. Mackell, 1971, 401 U.S. 66 , 91 S.Ct. 764 , 27 L.

  23. 362 F. Supp. 88 S.D. New YorkJuly 25, 1973

    Harris, 401 U.S. 37 , 91 S.Ct. 746 , 27 L.Ed.2d 669 (1971); Samuels v. Mackell, 401 U.S. 66 , 91 S.Ct. 764 , 27 L.Ed.2d 688 (1971).

  24. 503 F.2d 631 Fourth CircuitOctober 1, 1974

    Samuels v. Mackell, 401 U.S. 66, 72 , 91 S.Ct. 764, 767 , 27 L.Ed.2d 688 (1971).

  25. Kinney v. Lenon
    447 F.2d 596 Ninth CircuitOctober 13, 1971

    Landry, 401 U.S. 77 , 91 S.Ct. 758 , 27 L.Ed.2d 696 (1971); Samuels v. Machell, 401 U.S. 66 , 91 S.Ct. 764 , 27 L.Ed.2d 688 (1971)

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list