Citing references
Opinions citing Adams v. Williams, 407 U.S. 143 (1972)
4,215 citing cases
-
539 N.E.2d 764 Appellate Court of IllinoisMay 15, 1989
In Adams v. Williams (1972), 407 U.S. 143 , 32 L.Ed.2d 612 , 92 S.Ct. 1921 , the Supreme Court addressed the propriety of a police officer's reliance on an informant's tip in conducting a Terry stop.
-
539 N.E.2d 764 Appellate Court of IllinoisMay 15, 1989
In Adams v. Williams (1972), 407 U.S. 143 , 32 L. Ed. 2d 612 , 92 S. Ct. 1921 , the Supreme Court addressed the propriety of a police officer’s reliance on an informant’s tip in conducting a Terry stop.
-
648 F.2d 29 D.C. CircuitApril 10, 1981
Adams v. Williams, 407 U.S. 143 , 148 n. 3 ( 92 S.Ct. 1921 , 1924 n. 3, 32 L.Ed.2d 612 ) (1972).
-
799 So. 2d 890 Court of Appeals of MississippiNovember 6, 2001
Tate County, 628 So.2d 1376, 1379 (Miss.1993), citing Adams v. Williams, 407 U.S. 143, 147 , 92 S.Ct. 1921 , 32 L.Ed.2d 612 (1972).
-
161 F. Supp. 2d 634 D. MarylandSeptember 12, 2001
Adams v. Williams, 407 U.S. 143, 146 , 92 S.Ct. 1921 , 32 L.Ed.2d 612 (1972). However, an anonymous tip is not sufficient to establish reasonable suspicion, absent suitable corroboration. Florida v.
-
529 F.3d 1119 D.C. CircuitJune 20, 2008
Adams v. Williams, 407 U.S. 143, 146 , 92 S.Ct. 1921 , 32 L.Ed.2d 612 (1972).
-
856 P.2d 656 Court of Appeals of UtahJune 23, 1993
See also Adams v. Williams, 407 U.S. 143 , 92 S.Ct. 1921 , 32 L.Ed.2d 612 (1972).
-
437 A.2d 44 Superior Court of PennsylvaniaApril 30, 1982
Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 , 88 S.Ct. 1868 , 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968), and Adams v. Williams, 407 U.S. 143 , 92 S.Ct. 1921 , 32 L.Ed.2d 612 (1972).
-
662 N.E.2d 994 Indiana Court of AppealsMarch 22, 1996
In Adams v. Williams, 407 U.S. 143, 149 , 92 S.Ct. 1921, 1925 , 32 L.Ed.2d 612 (1972), the Court upheld a stop based on information given to the police, in person, by an informant who had previously provided information.
-
312 S.W.3d 276 Tex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)May 6, 2010
[2] See Adams v. Williams, 407 U.S. 143, 146-48 , 92 S.Ct. 1921 , 32 L.Ed.2d 612 (1972) (officer who reached into waistband had just been given information that suspect had gun there); Garcia v. State, 649 S.W.2d 697, 697-98 (Tex.App.
-
522 F. Supp. 855 M.D. PennsylvaniaJuly 10, 1981
Adams v.
-
693 A.2d 749 Court of Appeals of MarylandApril 15, 1997
.; see also Adams v. Williams, 407 U.S. 143 , 92 S.Ct. 1921 , 32 L.Ed.2d 612 (1972). Under certain conditions, more intrusive means of "frisking" may be justified.
-
842 P.2d 549 Wyoming Supreme CourtNovember 30, 1992
Adams v. Williams, 407 U.S. 143 , 92 S.Ct. 1921 , 32 L.Ed.2d 612 (1972). He may make an investigatory stop." Olson, 698 P.2d at 109-10 .
-
598 A.2d 1258 New Jersey Superior Court App DivisionSeptember 4, 1991
Until 1972, the strongest comment by the United States Supreme Court on the use of anonymous tips came in the form of dicta in Adams v. Williams, 407 U.S. 143 , 92 S.Ct. 1921 , 32 L.Ed. 2d 612 (1972). The Supreme Court in Adams v.
-
818 N.E.2d 774 Appellate Court of IllinoisNovember 10, 2004
Adams v. Williams, 407 U.S. 143, 145-48 , 92 S.Ct. 1921, 1922-24 , 32 L.Ed.2d 612, 616-18 (1972); Village of Gurnee v. Gross, 174 Ill.App.3d 66, 69-70 , 123 Ill.Dec. 866 , 528 N.E.2d 411 (1988).
-
490 F.2d 378 Ninth CircuitJanuary 11, 1974
Ohio (1968) 392 U.S. 1 , 88 S.Ct. 1868 , 20 L.Ed.2d 889 , and Adams v. Williams (1972) 407 U.S. 143 , 92 S.Ct. 1921 , 32 L.Ed.2d 612 ; (2) before the officers confronted Strickler, were the facts known to them sufficient to justify their detention of him?
-
284 F.3d 472 Third CircuitMarch 26, 2002
Adams v. Williams, 407 U.S. 143, 147 , 92 S.Ct. 1921 , 32 L.Ed.2d 612 (1972). Where the informant is identified, his veracity, basis of knowledge, and track record of providing information may suggest the tip's inherent reliability.
-
522 F.2d 1310 D.C. CircuitNovember 3, 1975
See: Williams v. Adams, 436 F.2d 3035 (2d Cir. 1970) (Friendly, J., dissenting), reversed by En banc vote without further argument, 441 F.2d 394 (2d Cir. 1971), in turn reversed, Adams v. Williams, 407 U.S. 143 , 92 S.Ct. 1921 , 32 L.Ed.2d 612 (1972).
-
2001 WI 22, 623 N.W.2d 516 Wisconsin Supreme CourtMarch 20, 2001
The United States Supreme Court examined this situation in Adams v. Williams, 407 U.S. 143 . In Adams , an informant approached a police officer and indicated that a particular individual in a nearby vehicle was in possession of drugs and a gun.
-
33 F.3d 554 Sixth CircuitSeptember 2, 1994 Dissent
As authority for this statement, the majority cites Adams v. Williams, 407 U.S. 143, 147 , 92 S.Ct. 1921, 1923 , 32 L.Ed.2d 612 (1972).
-
366 So. 2d 831 District Court of Appeal of FloridaJanuary 24, 1979
In its later decision in Adams v. Williams, 407 U.S. 143 , 92 S.Ct. 1921 , 32 L.Ed.2d 612 (1972), the Supreme Court made it clear that the Terry principle was not to be so restricted.
-
907 F.3d 472 Seventh CircuitOctober 18, 2018
Williams , 407 U.S. 143 , 146-47, 92 S.Ct. 1921 , 32 L.Ed.2d 612 (1972) (tip from known informant "carried enough indicia of reliability" to justify an "officer's forcible stop").
-
271 N.W.2d 503 Michigan Supreme CourtNovember 20, 1978
Adams v Williams, 407 US 143 ; 92 S Ct 1921 ; 32 L Ed 2d 612 (1972).
-
540 A.2d 1090 District of Columbia Court of AppealsApril 15, 1988
Adams v. Williams, 407 U.S. 143, 147 , 92 S.Ct. 1921, 1924 , 32 L.Ed.2d 612 (1972). [2] We hold that Detective Israel had articulable suspicion for making an investigatory Terry stop.
-
544 N.E.2d 825 Appellate Court of IllinoisSeptember 25, 1989
In In re J.J., we applied the reasoning of the United States Supreme Court in Adams v. Williams (1972), 407 U.S. 143 , 32 L. Ed. 2d 612 , 92 S. Ct. 1921 .