Citing references

Ct. 2574 (1975); Adams v. Williams, 407 U.S. 143 , 32 L. Ed. 2d 612 , 92 S. Ct. 1921 (1972). See also Hayes v. Florida, 470 U.S. 811, 815-16 , 84 L. Ed. 2d 705 , 105 S.

In Adams v. Williams (1972), 407 U.S. 143 , 92 S.Ct. 1921 , 32 L.Ed.2d 612 , a person approached a police officer who was in a patrol car and informed him that an individual seated in a nearby vehicle was carrying narcotics and had a gun at his waist.

Adams v. Williams, 407 U.S. 143, 146 , 92 S.Ct. 1921, 1923 , 32 L.Ed.2d 612 (1972). As if to underscore the limited nature of the Terry patdown exception, in a companion case decided the same day the U.S.

Adams v. Williams (1972), 407 U.S. 143, 147 , 92 S.Ct. 1921, 1923-1924 , 32 L.Ed.2d 612, 617-618 .

Castro, 29 N Y 2d 324; and Adams v. Williams, 407 U. S. 143 , supra).

Adams v. Williams (1972), 407 U.S. 143, 148 . The court qualified its decision in Adams by noting that the police officer knew the informant and had used his tips in the past, and the officer was alone in a high crime area. Id. at 146-147 .

Superior Ct. 201 , 245 A. 2d 692 (1968); Adams v. Williams, 407 U. S. 143 , 92 S. Ct. 1921 , 32 L. Ed. 2d 612, 617 (1972).

App. 533, 538 , 425 S.E.2d 530 (1993) (quoting Adams v. Williams, 407 U.S. 143, 145-46 , 32 L. Ed. 2d 612 , 92 S. Ct. 1921 (1972)).

California, 374 U.S. 23 , 83 S.Ct. 1623 , 10 L.Ed.2d 726 (1963); Adams v. Williams, 407 U.S. 143 , 92 S.Ct. 1921 , 32 L.Ed.2d 612 (1972); Jones v. United States, 362 U.S. 257 , 80 S.Ct. 725 , 4 L.Ed.2d 697 (1960); United States v.

Adams v. Williams (1972), 407 U.S. 143, 147 , 92 S.Ct. 1921, 1923-1924 , 32 L.Ed.2d 612, 617 .

In Adams v Williams (supra at 146 ), the tip came from an informant who was known to the police officer personally and had provided information to him in the past.

The case of Adams v. Williams, 407 U.S. 143 (1972), represented one departure from the requirement that there be a pat down prior to a seizure.

Williams (1972), 407 U.S. 143 , 92 *81 S.Ct. 1921 , 32 L.Ed.2d 612 , and also from an anonymous tip, when such information is corroborated by independent police investigation. Alabama v. White (1990), 496 U.S. 325 , 110 S.Ct. 2412 , 110 L.Ed.2d 301 .

Williams (1972), 407 U.S. 143 , 92 S.Ct. 1921 , 32 L.Ed.2d 612 , and Terry, 392 U.S. 1 , 88 S.Ct. 1868 , 20 L.Ed.2d 889 . {¶ 7} Objective justification for a traffic stop may also include reasons that constitute a carrying out of the “caretaking” function of police

Moorer , 2014-Ohio-4776 , 23 N.E.3d 173 , ¶ 11 citing Terry at 24, 88 S.Ct. 1868 Id. , citing Adams v. Williams 407 U.S. 143 , 92 S.Ct. 1921 , 32 L.Ed.2d 612 (1972) Terry , 392 U.S. at 29 , 88 S.Ct. 1868 Terry, 392 U.S. at 30 , 88 S.Ct. 1868 Id.

By analogy, investigative stops of motor vehicles are authorized in Adams v. Williams, 407 U.S. 143 (1972), and its progeny.

Adams v. Wil liams, 407 U.S. 143, 145-146 , 92 S.Ct. 1921 , 32 L.Ed. 2d 612 (1972).

Adams v. Williams, 407 U.S. 143, 146 , 92 S.Ct. 1921, 1923 , 32 L.Ed.2d 612 (1972).

(See Terry v Ohio, 392 US 1 , supra; Adams v Williams, 407 US 143, 145-146 , supra; Schneckloth v Bustamonte, 412 US 218, 232 , supra.)

In Adams v. Williams (1972), 407 U.S. 148 , 92 S.Ct. 1921 , 32 L.Ed.2d 612 , the court upheld a limited investigative intrusion.

. —’ Adams v. Williams, 407 US 143 , 148 n 3, 32 L. Ed 2d 612, 92 S. Ct. 1921 (1972).

As the Supreme Court observed in Adams v. Williams, 407 U.

Brown, 996 A.2d 473, 477 (Pa. 2010) quoting Adams v. Williams, 407 U.S. 143, 147 (1972) (“Informants tips like all other clues and evidence coming to a policeman on the scene, may vary greatly in their value and reliability.

Commonwealth, 217 Va. 552, 555 (1977), quoting from Adams v. Williams, 407 U.S. 143 , 92 S. Ct. 1921 (1972). The trooper knew that if the defendant were intoxicated when observed by Dodson, the defendant would still be intoxicated five minutes later.

Adams v. Williams, 407 U.S. 143, 145-46 (1972) (emphasis added) (citations omitted). The Court explained the limits of such investigations in Florida v.