Citing references: Adams v. Williams

527 P.2d 1036 Supreme Court of KansasNovember 2, 1974

(Adams v. Williams, 407 U. S. 143, 145-146 , 32 L. Ed. 2d 612 , 92 S. Ct. 1921 .)

665 P.2d 1111 Court of Appeals of KansasJune 23, 1983

Adams v. Williams [ 407 U.S. 143 , 32 L.Ed.2d 612 , 92 S.Ct. 1921 (1972)].

556 P.2d 864 Supreme Court of KansasNovember 6, 1976

Jackson, supra, we reviewed certain United States Supreme Court decisions on stop and frisk and stated: “The gist of the [Adams v. Williams, 407 U. S. 143 , 92 S. Ct. 1921 , 32 L.

State v. Jackson

515 P.2d 1108 Supreme Court of KansasNovember 3, 1973

Ct. 1889 ) which were companion cases to Terry , as well as the later case *224 of Adams v. Williams, 407 U. S. 143, 32 L. Ed. 2d 612 , 92 S. Ct. 1921, all of which deal with search and seizure or “stop and frisk” situations.

State v. Sanders

614 P.2d 998 Court of Appeals of KansasJuly 18, 1980

Another case using the Terry rationale was Adams v. Williams, 407 U.S. 143 , 32 L.Ed.2d 612 , 92 S.Ct. 1921 (1972), in which an officer reached into a car and grabbed a gun from defendant’s belt *198 when he was sitting in his car.

State v. Kearns

505 P.2d 676 Supreme Court of KansasJanuary 20, 1973

The propriety of such preliminary investigation was recently recognized in Adams v. Williams, 407 U. S. 143 , 32 L. Ed. 2d 612 , *160 92 S. Ct. 1921 . There, referring to Terry v. Ohio, 392 U. S. 1 , 20 L. Ed. 2d 889 , 88 S.

State v. Epperson

703 P.2d 761 Supreme Court of KansasJuly 26, 1985

New York, 392 U.S. 40 , 20 L.Ed.2d 917 , 88 S.Ct. 1889 (1968); and Adams v. Williams, 407 U.S. 143 , 32 L.Ed.2d 612 , 92 S.Ct. 1921 (1972). An important later case is that of State v. Marks, 226 Kan. 704 , 602 P.2d 1344 (1979).

State v. Slater

986 P.2d 1038 Supreme Court of KansasJuly 9, 1999

Adams v. Williams, 407 U.S. 143, 147 , 32 L. Ed.2d 612 , 92 S. Ct. 1921 (1972). In Alabama v.

State v. Hicks

147 P.3d 1076 Supreme Court of KansasDecember 8, 2006

Gates, 462 U.S. at 233 -34 (citing Adams v. Williams, 407 U.S. 143, 146-47 , 32 L. Ed. 2d 612 , 92 S. Ct. 1921 [1972]); see State v.

State v. McKeown

819 P.2d 644 Supreme Court of KansasOctober 25, 1991

Adams v. Williams, 407 U.S. 143, 146 , 32 L. Ed. 2d 612 , 92 S. Ct. 1921 (1972). This court included this quote in State v.

State v. Coe

574 P.2d 929 Supreme Court of KansasNovember 22, 1977

We cited with approval Adams v. Williams, 407 U.S. 143 , 32 L.Ed.2d 612 , 92 S.Ct. 1921 , where the court stated probable cause does not require the same type of specific evidence for each element of the offense as would be needed to support a conviction.

State v. Strauch

718 P.2d 613 Supreme Court of KansasMay 2, 1986

Adams v. Williams, 407 U.S. 143 , 32 L. Ed. 2d 612 , 92 S. Ct. 1921 (1972). In dealing with probable cause, as the name implies, we are not dealing with technicalities, but with probabilities. Illinois v. Gates, 462 U.S. 213, 241 , 76 L.

State v. Hensley

313 P.3d 814 Supreme Court of KansasDecember 6, 2013

Ed. 2d 527 (1983) (quoting Adams v. Williams, 407 U.S. 143, 147 , 92 S. Ct. 1921 , 32 L. Ed. 2d 612 [1972]).

State v. Curtis

538 P.2d 1383 Supreme Court of KansasJuly 17, 1975

In the more recent case of Adams v. Williams, 407 U. S. 143 , 32 L. Ed. 2d 612 , 92 S.

State v. Evans

548 P.2d 772 Supreme Court of KansasApril 10, 1976

(Adams v. Williams, 407 U. S. 143 , 32 L. Ed. 2d 612 , 92 S. Ct. 1921 .)

State v. Morin

538 P.2d 684 Supreme Court of KansasJuly 17, 1975

Ct. 1868 , and Adams v. Williams, 407 U. S. 143 , 32 L. Ed. 2d 612 , 92 S. Ct. 1921 . The arresting officers then observed a brown plastic bag which matched the description contained in the earlier broadcast. The defendant was immediately arrested.

State v. Beltran

300 P.3d 92 Court of Appeals of KansasMay 3, 2013

See Johnson, 555 U.S. at 326-27 ; Adams v. Williams, 407 U.S. 143, 145-46 , 92 S. Ct. 1921 , 32 L. Ed. 2d 612 (1972); Terry, 392 U.S. at 21-23, 30 .

State v. Toler

787 P.2d 711 Supreme Court of KansasMarch 2, 1990

Adams v. Williams [ 407 U.S. 143 , 32 L. Ed. 2d 612 , 92 S. Ct. 1921 (1972)].

State v. Hayes

597 P.2d 268 Court of Appeals of KansasJuly 13, 1979

In Adams v.

State v. Partridge

33 P.3d 862 Court of Appeals of KansasOctober 19, 2001

Unlike a tip from a known informant whose reputation can be assessed and who can be held responsible if her allegations turn out to be fabricated, see Adams v. Williams, 407 U.S. 143, 146-47 [, 32 L. Ed. 2d 612 , 92 S.

State v. Arrizabalaga

447 P.3d 391 Court of Appeals of KansasJuly 26, 2019

Williams, 407 U.S. 143 , 92 S. Ct. 1921 , 32 L. Ed. 2d 612 (1972) ].' 452 U.S., at 700, n. 12. Later, in Place, [ 462 U.S. 696, 709 , 103 S. Ct. 2637 , 77 L.

Attorney General Opinion No.

Kansas Attorney General ReportsSeptember 2, 1993

Ohio , 392 U.S. 1 , 20 L.Ed.2d 889 , 88 S.Ct. 1868 (1968); Adams v. Williams , 407 U.S. 143 , 32 L.Ed.2d 612 , 92 S.Ct. 1921 (1972); United States v. Brignoni-Ponce , 422 U.S. 873 , 45 L.Ed.2d 607 , 95 S.Ct. 2574 (1974); United States v.

Schreiner v. Hodge

Court of Appeals of KansasNovember 9, 2017

Ed. 2d 694 (2009); Adams v. Williams, 407 U.S. 143, 145-46 , 92 S. Ct. 1921 , 32 L. Ed. 2d 612 (1972); Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 21-23, 30 , 88 S. Ct. 1868 , 20 L. Ed. 2d 889 (1968).

State v. Taylor

Court of Appeals of KansasOctober 30, 2020 Unpublished

Ed. 2d 694 (2009); Adams v. Williams, 407 U.S. 143, 145-46 , 92 S. Ct. 1921 , 32 L. Ed. 2d 612 (1972); Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 21-23, 30 , 88 S. Ct. 1868 , 20 L. Ed. 2d 889 (1968).

State v. Blake

Court of Appeals of KansasFebruary 23, 2024 Unpublished

Ed. 2d 694 (2009); Adams v. Williams, 407 U.S. 143, 145-46 , 92 S. Ct. 1921 , 32 L. Ed. 2d 612 (1972); Terry, 392 U.S. at 21-23, 30 .

`/`	Focus the search box
`j` `k`	Next / previous result
`Enter`	Open the selected result
`n` `p`	Next / previous search term in a case
`c`	Copy the citation of the current case
`+` `−`	Larger / smaller reading text
`?`	Show this list