TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Citing references

Opinions citing Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973)

4,283 citing cases · 27 match your filters

Negative treatment
Depth Newest Oldest Most cited
Majority opinions only
1 2–3 4–9 10+ times cited
  1. City of Long Beach v. Exxon Corp.
    830 F.2d 198 Temporary Emergency Court of AppealsAugust 18, 1987 Concurrence

    In Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 , 93 S.Ct. 705 , 35 L.Ed.2d 147 (1973), after holding in Part IV-A that the case of Jane Roe presented a justiciable controversy on appeal, and before holding that the case of Dr.

  2. Federal-Mogul Corp. v. United States
    822 F. Supp. 782 Court of International TradeMay 25, 1993

    Odegaard, 416 U.S. 312, 319 , 94 S.Ct. 1704, 1707 , 40 L.Ed.2d 164 (1974); Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113, 125 , 93 S.Ct. 705, 713 , 35 L.Ed.2d 147 (1973); Southern Pacific Terminal Co. v.

  3. Verson, a Div. of Allied Products Corp. v. United States
    5 F. Supp. 2d 963 Court of International TradeMarch 23, 1998

    Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113, 125 , 93 S.Ct. 705 , 35 L.Ed.2d 147 (1973) (quoting Southern Pacific Terminal Co. v. ICC, 219 U.S. 498, 515 , 31 S.Ct. 279 , 55 L.Ed. 310 (1911)).

  4. American Spring Wire Corp. v. United States
    569 F. Supp. 73 Court of International TradeAugust 24, 1983

    See, e.g., Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 , 93 S.Ct. 705 , 35 L.Ed.2d 147 (1972); Southern Pacific Terminal Co. v. ICC, 219 U.S. 498, 515 , 31 S.Ct. 279, 283 , 55 L.Ed. 310 (1911).

  5. Torrington Co. v. United States
    802 F. Supp. 453 Court of International TradeSeptember 25, 1992

    See Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113, 125 , 93 S.Ct. 705, 714 , 35 L.Ed.2d 147 (1973); see also SEC v. Medical Comm. for Human Rights, 404 U.S. 403, 407 , 92 S.Ct. 577, 580 , 30 L.Ed.2d 560 (1972).

  6. Abortion & Sterilization
    70 Pa. D. & C.2d 694 Pennsylvania Department of JusticeMay 12, 1975

    Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973), that: “(a) For the stage prior to approximately the end of the first trimester, the abortion decision and its effectuation must be left to the medical judgment of the pregnant woman’s attending physician.

  7. Rooks v. Secretary of Department of Health & Human Services
    35 Fed. Cl. 1 Federal ClaimsJanuary 29, 1996

    Respondent’s Brf. at 8 (citing Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 , 93 S.Ct. 705 , 35 L.Ed.2d 147 (1973)). This argument is not persuasive. The cases are inapposite. Roe v. Wade dealt with entitlement to Fourteenth Amendment protection by the unborn.

  8. Whistleblower 14106-10W v. Commissioner
    137 T.C. No. 15, 76 A.L.R. Fed. 2d 713 U.S. Tax CourtDecember 8, 2011

    See, e.g., Roe v. Wade , 410 U.S. 113 , 93 S. Ct. 705 , 35 L. Ed. 2d 147 (1973) ; Doe v. Sullivan , 938 F.2d 1370 , 291 U.S. App. D.C. 111 (D.C. Cir. 1991) ; Doe v. Weinberger , 820 F.2d 1275 , 261 U.S. App. D.C. 96 (D.C. Cir. 1987) . In Qualls v.

  9. PPG Industries, Inc. v. United States
    660 F. Supp. 965 Court of International TradeApril 20, 1987

    See Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 , 93 S.Ct. 705 , 35 L.Ed.2d 147 (1973); Southern Pacific Terminal Co. v. Interstate Commerce Commission, 219 U.S. 498 , 31 S.Ct. 279 , 55 L.Ed. 310 (1911).

  10. Anonymous v. Comm'r
    127 T.C. No. 6 U.S. Tax CourtSeptember 6, 2006

    Rumsfeld, 228 F.R.D. 8 , 10 (D.D.C. 2005) (citing Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 , 93 S. Ct. 705 , 35 L. Ed. 2d 147 (1973) , and Doe v. Sullivan, 291 U.S. App. D.C. 111 , 938 F.2d 1370 , 1374 (D.C. Cir. 1991) ).

  11. Loomis v. United States
    68 Fed. Cl. 503 Federal ClaimsNovember 7, 2005

    Int'l, 431 U.S. 678 , 97 S.Ct. 2010 , 52 L.Ed.2d 675 (1977); Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 , 93 S.Ct. 705 , 35 L.Ed.2d 147 (1973); Eisenstadt v. Baird, 405 U.S. 438 , 92 S.Ct. 1029 , 31 L.Ed.2d 349 (1972); Griswold v.

  12. Cassman v. United States
    31 Fed. Cl. 121 Federal ClaimsApril 28, 1994

    Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113, 162 , 93 S.Ct. 705, 731 , 35 L.Ed.2d 147 (1973). . It is true, as plaintiffs have pointed out, that for certain legal puiposes the word "child” has been construed to include an unborn child.

  13. NSK Ltd. v. United States
    819 F. Supp. 1096 Court of International TradeApril 2, 1993

    See Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113, 125 (1973); see also SEC v. Medical Comm, for Human Rights, 404 U.S. 403, 407 (1972). In PPG Indus., Inc. v. United States, 11 CIT 303 , 660 F.

  14. SKF USA, Inc. v. U.S. Department of Commerce
    806 F. Supp. 1021 Court of International TradeNovember 5, 1992

    See Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113, 125 (1973); see also SEC v. Medical Comm. for Human Rights, 404 U.S. 403, 407 (1972). In PPG Industries, Inc. v. United States, 11 CIT 303 , 660 F.

  15. Application of the Comstock Act to the Mailing of Prescription Drugs That Can Be Used for Abortions
    Office of Legal CounselDecember 23, 2022

    Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973), 1 you have asked for this Of- fice’s view on whether section 1461 of title 18 of the United States Code prohibits the mailing of mifepristone and misoprostol, two prescription drugs that are commonly used to produce abortions, 2 among

  16. Pueblo of Santo Domingo v. United States
    647 F.2d 1087 Court of ClaimsApril 22, 1981 Dissent

    Still the decision in its unwisdom is "an exercise of raw judicial power” in the deathless words of Justice White, dissenting in Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113, 222 (1973). I emphasize the word "raw.”

  17. Martinez v. Commissioner
    1998 T.C. Memo. 199 U.S. Tax CourtJune 1, 1998 Unpublished

    Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973) Petitioners' refusal to file returns and pay tax for the years at issue is grounded in their contention that their constitutional rights will be violated because any tax that they might pay would be used in part to fund abortions, which

  18. Doe
    221 Ct. Cl. 940 Court of ClaimsNovember 2, 1979

    See Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973); Doe v. Bolton, 410 U.S. 179 (1973). This case is a proper one in which to allow the use of fictitious names. The Witness Protection Program is designed to maintain and protect the anonymity of confidential informants.

  19. Proposed Federal Abortion Legislation
    Office of Legal CounselJuly 1, 1992

    The Revised Bill The bill is described by its sponsors as a “codification” of much of the complex regime of abortion legislation erected by the Supreme Court since its 1973 decision in Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973).

  20. Constitutionality of Section 7(b)(3) of the Emergency Veterans' Job Training Act of 1983
    Office of Legal CounselJanuary 23, 1989

    Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973), neither the state nor the federal government had an obligation to fund abortions — even those that w ere “therapeutic.”

  21. Anonymous v. Commissioner
    127 T.C. No. 6 U.S. Tax CourtSeptember 6, 2006

    Rumsfeld, 228 F.R.D. 8, 10 (D.D.C. 2005) (citing Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973), and Doe v. Sullivan, 938 F.2d 1370, 1374 (D.C. Cir. 1991)).

  22. Application of the Hyde Amendment to Federal Student-Aid Programs
    Office of Legal CounselJanuary 16, 2021

    In the immediate aftermath of Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973), fed- eral funds were available to provide abortions, most prominently through the Medicaid program. See Jon O. Shimabukuro, Cong.

  23. NTN Bearing Corp. of America v. United States
    17 Ct. Int'l Trade 254 Court of International TradeApril 13, 1993

    See Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113, 125 (1973); see also SEC v. Medical Comm. for Human Rights, 404 U.S. 403, 407 (1972). The Court adheres to its decision in NSK Ltd. and NSK Corporation v.

  24. NTN Bearing Corp. of America v. United States
    17 Ct. Int'l Trade 272 Court of International TradeApril 21, 1993

    See Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113, 125 (1973); see also SEC v. Medical Comm. for Human Rights, 404 U.S. 403, 407 (1972). The Court adheres to its decision in NSK Ltd. and NSK Corporation v.

  25. NSK Ltd. v. United States
    17 Ct. Int'l Trade 488 Court of International TradeJune 1, 1993

    See Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113, 125 (1973): see also SEC v. Medical Comm. for Human Rights, 404 U.S. 403, 407 (1972). In this case, the errors alleged by NSK were corrected by Commerce in its amended final determination.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list