Citing references
Opinions citing McFadden v. State, 542 So. 2d 871 (Miss. 1989)
70 citing cases
-
599 So. 2d 559 Mississippi Supreme CourtApril 22, 1992
Department of Wildlife Conservation, 571 So.2d 263, 267 (Miss. 1990); McFadden v. State, 542 So.2d 871 (Miss. 1989). Courts of this state have a duty and an obligation to enforce federally created rights. Burrell v.
-
580 So. 2d 1210 Mississippi Supreme CourtMay 3, 1991
McFadden v. State, 542 So.2d 871, 874 (Miss. 1989). The court must review carefully all of the evidentiary matters before it admissions in pleadings, answers to interrogatories, depositions, affidavits, etc.
-
744 So. 2d 383 Court of Appeals of MississippiJune 22, 1999
McFadden v. State, 542 So.2d 871, 877 (Miss.1989)(emphasis added). ¶ 26. Brumfield asserts that the arrest by Officer Gill constituted a ministerial act, and therefore, Officer Gill was not subject to the qualified immunity defense.
-
583 So. 2d 946 Mississippi Supreme CourtJune 26, 1991
State, 542 So.2d 871 (Miss. 1989), When an individual who is a state government official is named as a defendant in a civil action, our law thus directs that he or she enjoy no immunity to a civil action for damages if his breach of a legal duty causes injury
-
847 So. 2d 258 Mississippi Supreme CourtMay 29, 2003
Miller, 599 So.2d at 567 ; McFadden v. State, 542 So.2d 871, 877 (Miss.1989); Region VII, Mental Health-Mental Retardation Ctr. v. Isaac, 523 So.2d 1013 (Miss. 1988). ¶ 36. In Pruett v.
-
580 So. 2d 1242 Mississippi Supreme CourtMay 3, 1991
Overstreet, 570 So.2d at 1197 ; McFadden v. State, 542 So.2d 871, 874-75 (Miss. 1989); Stanton & Associates, Inc., 464 So.2d at 505 . We review the Circuit Court's dismissal of the complaint de novo.
-
871 So. 2d 713 Mississippi Supreme CourtApril 22, 2004
Id. at 854 (citing McFadden v. State, 542 So.2d 871 (Miss.1989)). Here, the trial court correctly found MDOT's duty to regularly inspect and maintain Highway 528 to be discretionary.
-
757 So. 2d 946 Mississippi Supreme CourtJune 3, 1999
State, 542 So.2d 871 (Miss.1989), as follows: When an individual who is a state government official is named as a defendant in a civil action, our law thus directs that he or she enjoy no immunity to a civil action for damages if his breach of a legal duty causes
-
647 So. 2d 678 Mississippi Supreme CourtDecember 8, 1994
McFadden v. State, 542 So.2d 871, 874 (Miss. 1989). However, Bilbo makes no allegation of personal involvement by any of the defendants.
-
858 So. 2d 163 Court of Appeals of MississippiOctober 7, 2003
McFadden v. State, 542 So.2d 871, 877 (Miss.1989).
-
Mississippi Supreme CourtMarch 31, 1998
State, 542 So.2d 871 (Miss.1989), as follows: When an individual who is a state government official is named as a defendant in a civil action, our law thus directs that he or she enjoy no immunity to a civil action for damages if his breach of a legal
-
Mississippi Supreme CourtNovember 26, 2001
Miller, 599 So. 2d at 567 ; McFadden v. State, 542 So. 2d 871, 877 (Miss. 1989); Region VII, Mental Health-Retardation Ctr. v. Isaac, 523 So. 2d 1013 (Miss. 1988). ¶36. In Pruett v.
-
Mississippi Supreme CourtFebruary 10, 2003
at 854 (citing McFadden v. State, 542 So.2d 871 (Miss.1989)). Here, the trial court correctly found MDOT's duty to regularly inspect and maintain Highway 528 to be discretionary.
-
937 So. 2d 958 Court of Appeals of MississippiJune 13, 2006
(citing McFadden v. State, 542 So.2d 871, 874 (Miss.1989)). "If any triable issues of fact exist, the lower court's decision to grant summary judgment will be reversed." Id. (citing Miller v. Meeks, 762 So.2d 302, 304 (¶ 3) (Miss.2000)).
-
583 So. 2d 174 Mississippi Supreme CourtJune 19, 1991
McKinnon, 552 So.2d 91, 91 (Miss. 1989); McFadden v. State, 542 So.2d 871, 874 (Miss. 1989); see Wilkinson v. Mercantile National Bank, 529 So.2d 616, 618 (Miss. 1988); Knight v. Moore, 396 So.2d 31, 34 (Miss. 1981) (quoting Franklin v.
-
762 So. 2d 302 Mississippi Supreme CourtJune 29, 2000
McFadden v. State, 542 So.2d 871, 874 (Miss.1989). Issues of fact sufficient to require a denial of a motion for summary judgment are obviously present where one party swears to one version of the matter in issue and another says the opposite.
-
557 So. 2d 780 Mississippi Supreme CourtFebruary 14, 1990
Smith, 548 So.2d 412, 415 (Miss. 1989); McFadden v. State of Mississippi, 542 So.2d 871, 874 (Miss. 1989); Wilkinson v. Mercantile National Bank, 529 So.2d 616, 618 (Miss. 1988).
-
744 So. 2d 256 Mississippi Supreme CourtJune 10, 1999
McFadden v. State, 542 So.2d 871, 874-75 (Miss.1989). b. ¶ 6.
-
562 So. 2d 1212 Mississippi Supreme CourtApril 18, 1990
See, e.g., McFadden v. State of Mississippi, 542 So.2d 871, 879-81 (Miss. 1989); Grantham v. Mississippi Dept. of Corrections, 522 So.2d 219, 223-26 (Miss. 1988). Those reasons have nothing to do with the limitations question presented today.
-
556 So. 2d 1059 Mississippi Supreme CourtFebruary 7, 1990
McKinnon, 552 So.2d 91, 91 (Miss. 1989); McFadden v. State, 542 So.2d 871, 874 (Miss. 1989); see Wilkinson v. Mercantile National Bank, 529 So.2d 616, 618 (Miss. 1988); Knight v. Moore, 396 So.2d 31, 34 (Miss. 1981) (quoting Franklin v.
-
635 So. 2d 813 Mississippi Supreme CourtMarch 31, 1994
McFadden v. State, 542 So.2d 871, 875 (Miss. 1989).
-
675 So. 2d 848 Mississippi Supreme CourtJune 6, 1996
See McFadden v. State, 542 So.2d 871, 881 (Miss. 1989).
-
548 So. 2d 1299 Mississippi Supreme CourtAugust 23, 1989
McFadden v. State, 542 So.2d 871, 877 (Miss. 1989), quoting Grantham v. Miss. Dep't. of Corrections, 522 So.2d 219, 225 (Miss. 1988). In the case at bar, we are not faced with a ministerial duty.
-
759 So. 2d 1150 Mississippi Supreme CourtDecember 9, 1999
City of Vardaman, 580 So.2d 733 , 735 (Miss.1991); McFadden v. State, 542 So.2d 871, 876-77, fn. 2 (Miss.1989); Richardson v. Rankin County School Dist., 540 So.2d 5, 7-8 (Miss.1989); Webb v. County of Lincoln, 536 So.2d 1356, 1358-59 (Miss. 1988).
-
571 So. 2d 263 Mississippi Supreme CourtNovember 28, 1990
McFadden v. State, 542 So.2d 871, 875 (Miss. 1989); Marx, 520 So.2d at 1346 . Beyond all of this, his suit for injunction presents a traditional subject of equity jurisdiction. Southern Bus Lines v.