Citing references
Opinions citing Illinois v. Gates, 462 U.S. 213 (1983)
14,470 citing cases · 3,032 match your filters
-
869 P.2d 1260 Supreme Court of ColoradoMarch 7, 1994
Illinois v. Gates, 462 U.S. 213 , 103 S.Ct. 2317 , 76 L.Ed.2d 527 (1983) (abandoning the two-pronged test that was set forth in Aguilar v. Texas, 378 U.S. 108 , 84 S.Ct. 1509 , 12 L.Ed.2d 723 (1964), and Spinelli v.
-
182 F.3d 473 Sixth CircuitJune 30, 1999
Illinois v. Gates, 462 U.S. 213 , 244 n. 13, 103 S.Ct. 2317 , 76 L.Ed.2d 527 (1983). A warrant must be upheld as long as the magistrate had a “substantial basis for ... concluding] that a search would uncover evidence of wrongdoing....”
-
962 S.W.2d 132 Tex. App. Ct., 9th Dist. (Beaumont)February 25, 1998
Illinois v. Gates, 462 U.S. 213, 238-39 , 103 S.Ct. 2317, 2332-33 , 76 L.Ed.2d 527 (1983). ....
-
717 A.2d 490 Supreme Court of PennsylvaniaAugust 20, 1998
Banks, 540 Pa. 453 , 658 A.2d 752 (1995), citing Illinois v. Gates, 462 U.S. 213 , 103 S.Ct. 2317 , 76 L.Ed.2d 527 (1983). The totality of the circumstances test finds its roots in the opinion of the United States Supreme Court in Illinois v.
-
878 P.2d 685 Supreme Court of ColoradoJuly 11, 1994
Illinois v. Gates, 462 U.S. 213 , 103 S.Ct. 2317 , 76 L.Ed.2d 527 (1983).
-
679 A.2d 199 New Jersey Superior Court App DivisionJuly 26, 1996
Illinois v. Gates, 462 U.S. 213, 237-238 , 103 S.Ct. 2317, 2332 , 76 L.Ed. 2d 527, 548 (1983); State v. Novembrino, 105 N.J. 95, 121-123 , 519 A. 2d 820 (1987).
-
919 F.2d 405 Seventh CircuitNovember 21, 1990
Illinois v. Gates, 462 U.S. 213, 250 , 103 S.Ct. 2317, 2338 , 76 L.Ed.2d 527 (1983); see also United States v. Zambrana, 841 F.2d 1320, 1332 (7th Cir.1988); United States v.
-
168 F.3d 293 Sixth CircuitMarch 2, 1999
Sonagere, 30 F.3d 51, 53 (6th Cir.1994) (quoting Illinois v. Gates, 462 U.S. 213, 236 , 103 S.Ct. 2317 , 76 L.Ed.2d 527 (1983)).
-
774 F. Supp. 1544 W.D. WisconsinMay 8, 1990
Gates, 462 U.S. 213, 238 , 103 S.Ct. 2317, 2332 , 76 L.Ed.2d 527 (1983): The task of the issuing magistrate is simply to make a practical, commonsense decision whether, given all the circumstances set forth in the affidavit before him, including the “veracity”
-
581 A.2d 19 Court of Special Appeals of MarylandOctober 30, 1990
Illinois v.
-
641 A.2d 214 Court of Appeals of MarylandMay 13, 1994
[3] The "totality of the circumstances" test was enunciated in Illinois v. Gates, 462 U.S. 213 , 103 S.Ct. 2317 , 76 L.Ed.2d 527 (1983).
-
452 N.W.2d 184 Supreme Court of IowaApril 11, 1990
We note that the Aguilar-Spinelli test was substantially overruled in the context of a federal fourth amendment challenge by Illinois v. Gates, 462 U.S. 213, 238 , 103 S.Ct. 2317, 2332 , 76 L.Ed.2d 527, 548 (1983).
-
663 N.E.2d 1131 Appellate Court of IllinoisApril 16, 1996
The United States Supreme Court addressed anonymous tips in a probable cause context in Illinois v. Gates, 462 U.S. 213 , 103 S.Ct. 2317 , 76 L.Ed.2d 527 (1983).
-
7 F. Supp. 2d 836 W.D. TexasDecember 2, 1997
Illinois v. Gates, 462 U.S. 213, 232 , 103 S.Ct. 2317 , 76 L.Ed.2d 527, 544 (1983). In Gates , the Supreme Court adopted a totality-of-the-circumstances test to determine probable cause.
-
90 F.3d 75 Third CircuitJuly 16, 1996
In Illinois v. Gates, 462 U.S. 213 , 103 S.Ct. 2317 , 76 L.Ed.2d 527 (1983), the Court, again dealing with probable cause, abandoned this two-pronged test in favor of a totality of the circumstances approach for evaluating an anonymous tip.
-
785 P.2d 934 Supreme Court of ColoradoFebruary 12, 1990
In Illinois v.
-
965 F.2d 262 Seventh CircuitJune 9, 1992
For the reasons that follow, today we determine that Fourth Amendment warrant and nonwarrant cases 1 both are subject to review for clear error. 2 Our starting point is Illinois v. Gates, 462 U.S. 213 , 103 S.Ct. 2317 , 76 L.Ed.2d 527 (1983).
-
594 A.2d 917 Supreme Court of ConnecticutJuly 16, 1991
Kimbro, supra, and to adopt the “totality of the circumstances” standard for determining probable cause used in the federal courts pursuant to the decision of the United States Supreme Court in Illinois v. Gates, 462 U.S. 213 , 103 S. Ct. 2317 , 76 L.
-
80 F.3d 1131 Sixth CircuitApril 9, 1996
The probable cause standard is a “ ‘practical, non-technical conception.’ ” Illinois v. Gates, 462 U.S. 213, 231 , 103 S.Ct. 2317, 2328 , 76 L.Ed.2d 527 (1983) (quoting Brinegar v. U.S., 338 U.S. 160, 176 , 69 S.Ct. 1302, 1311 , 93 L.Ed. 1879 (1949)).
-
113 F.3d 279 First CircuitMay 16, 1997
Gates, 462 U.S. 213, 238 , 103 S.Ct. 2317, 2332 , 76 L.Ed.2d 527 (1983). “[P]robable cause need not be tantamount to proof beyond a reasonable doubt____ Probability is the touchstone.”
-
655 So. 2d 1123 Supreme Court of FloridaJune 1, 1995
Accordingly, we must determine whether the First District's analysis is consistent with the "totality of circumstances" analysis for determining probable cause as adopted in Illinois v. Gates, 462 U.S. 213 , 103 S.Ct. 2317 , 76 L.Ed.2d 527 (1983).
-
843 P.2d 658 Supreme Court of ColoradoJanuary 19, 1993
Illinois v. Gates, 462 U.S. 213, 238-39 , 103 S.Ct. 2317, 2332 , 76 L.Ed.2d 527 (1983) (quoting Jones v. United States, 362 U.S. 257, 271 , 80 S.Ct. 725, 736 , 4 L.Ed.2d 697 (1960)); People v. Paquin, 811 P.2d 394, 398 (Colo.1991).
-
712 A.2d 534 Court of Appeals of MarylandJuly 1, 1998
State, 314 Md. 221, 222 , 550 A.2d 670, 673 (1988)(quoting Illinois v. Gates, 462 U.S. 213, 238 , 103 S.Ct. 2317, 2332 , 76 L.Ed.2d 527, 548 (1983)).
-
979 S.W.2d 13 Court of Appeals of TexasSeptember 3, 1998
Illinois v. Gates, 462 U.S. 213, 238 , 103 S.Ct. 2317 , 76 L.Ed.2d 527 (1983); see Guzman, 955 S.W.2d at 90 . On the first question, we have guidance from the United States Supreme Court in Gates .
-
687 N.E.2d 180 Indiana Supreme CourtNovember 3, 1997
Illinois v. Gates, 462 U.S. 213, 238 , 103 S.Ct. 2317, 2332 , 76 L.Ed.2d 527 (1983). The duty of the reviewing court is to determine whether the magistrate had a “substantial basis” for concluding that probable cause existed. Id.