TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Citing references

Opinions citing Illinois v. Gates, 462 U.S. 213 (1983)

14,470 citing cases · 3,578 match your filters

Negative treatment
Depth Newest Oldest Most cited
Majority opinions only
1 2–3 4–9 10+ times cited
  1. State v. Barnaby
    2006 MT 203, 142 P.3d 809 Montana Supreme CourtAugust 23, 2006

    Illinois v. Gates (1983), 462 U.S. 213, 232 , 103 S.Ct. 2317, 2329 , 76 L.Ed.2d 527 .

  2. State v. Romero
    2009 WI 32, 765 N.W.2d 756 Wisconsin Supreme CourtMay 7, 2009

    [43] Illinois v. Gates, 462 U.S. 213, 238-39 , 103 S.Ct. 2317 , 76 L.Ed.2d 527 (1983). [1] Majority op., ¶ 1.

  3. United States of America Government of the Virgin Islands v. Ernie Ritter Reggy Ritter Dale Ritter
    416 F.3d 256 Third CircuitAugust 3, 2005

    Id. at 1205 (citing Illinois v. Gates, 462 U.S. 213, 236 , 103 S.Ct. 2317 , 76 L.Ed.2d 527 (1983)). B.

  4. State v. Sweedland
    2006 SD 77, 721 N.W.2d 409 South Dakota Supreme CourtAugust 16, 2006

    . ¶ 7 (citing Illinois v. Gates, 462 U.S. 213, 238 , 103 S.Ct. 2317, 2332 , 76 L.Ed.2d 527 (1983)).

  5. West v. State
    768 A.2d 150 Court of Special Appeals of MarylandMarch 7, 2001

    Illinois v. Gates, 462 U.S. 213, 238 , 103 S.Ct. 2317 , 76 L.Ed.2d 527 (1983); Birchead v. State, 317 Md. 691, 700 , 566 A.2d 488 (1989).

  6. Patterson v. State
    930 A.2d 348 Court of Appeals of MarylandAugust 24, 2007

    State, 314 Md. 221, 227 , 550 A.2d 670, 673 (1988) (quoting Illinois v. Gates, 462 U.S. 213, 238 , 103 S.Ct. 2317, 2332 , 76 L.Ed.2d 527, 548 (1983)).

  7. United States v. Kenneth Eugene Allen
    211 F.3d 970 Sixth CircuitMay 4, 2000 Dissent

    The jurisprudential evolution concerning the requirements for the issu- *980 anee of warrants reached its peak in the seminal case of Illinois v. Gates, 462 U.S. 213 , 103 S.Ct. 2317 , 76 L.Ed.2d 527 (1983).

  8. State v. Crowley
    41 P.3d 618 Court of Appeals of ArizonaFebruary 22, 2002

    Gates, 462 U.S. 213 , 103 S.Ct. 2317 , 76 L.Ed.2d 527 (1983), and case law from other jurisdictions, both federal and state, decided since Gates .

  9. State v. Rabon
    2007 ME 113, 930 A.2d 268 Supreme Judicial Court of MaineAugust 14, 2007

    The Probable Cause Standard [¶ 22] To determine probable cause, a magistrate must apply the "totality-of-the-circumstances approach" articulated in Illinois v. Gates, 462 U.S. 213, 230 , 103 S.Ct. 2317 , 76 L.Ed.2d 527 (1983).

  10. United States v. Micah J. Gourde
    440 F.3d 1065 Ninth CircuitMarch 9, 2006

    Illinois v. Gates, 462 U.S. 213, 238 , 103 S.Ct. 2317 , 76 L.Ed.2d 527 (1983). 2 The Fourth Amendment requires no more. BACKGROUND I.

  11. People v. Payne
    912 N.E.2d 301 Appellate Court of IllinoisJuly 6, 2009

    See Illinois v. Gates, 462 U.S. 213, 230 , 76 L. Ed. 2d 527, 543 , 103 S. Ct. 2317, 2328 (1983).

  12. United States v. Terrell Lamont Bynum
    293 F.3d 192 Fourth CircuitJune 14, 2002

    See Illinois v. Gates, 462 U.S. 213, 238 , 103 S.Ct. 2317 , 76 L.Ed.2d 527 (1983); United States v. Gillenwaters, 890 F.2d 679, 682 (4th Cir.1989).

  13. State v. Gilmore
    2009 SD 11, 762 N.W.2d 637 South Dakota Supreme CourtFebruary 25, 2009

    In the landmark case of Illinois v.

  14. Serrano v. State
    123 S.W.3d 53 Tex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)September 25, 2003

    Illinois v. Gates, 462 U.S. 213, 236 , 103 S.Ct. 2317 , 76 L.Ed.2d 527 (1983); Lane v. State, 971 S.W.2d 748, 752 (Tex.App.-Dallas 1998, pet. refd).

  15. United States v. Kenneth King
    227 F.3d 732 Sixth CircuitOctober 19, 2000

    Sonagere, 30 F.3d 51, 53 (6th Cir.1994) (quoting Illinois v. Gates, 462 U.S. 213, 236 , 103 S.Ct. 2317 , 76 L.Ed.2d 527 (1983)).

  16. State v. Raveydts
    2004 SD 134, 691 N.W.2d 290 South Dakota Supreme CourtDecember 22, 2004

    Jackson, 2000 SD 113, ¶ 8 , 616 N.W.2d 412, 416 (citing Illinois v. Gates, 462 U.S. 213, 238-39 , 103 S.Ct. 2317, 2332 , 76 L.Ed.2d 527, 548 (1983) (citations omitted)).

  17. United States v. Tatum
    121 F. Supp. 2d 589 E.D. TexasAugust 10, 2000

    The court’s review of the evidential sufficiency for a warrant follows, as it must, the principles established by the Supreme Court in the seminal case Illinois v. Gates, 462 U.S. 213 , 103 S.Ct. 2317 , 76 L.Ed.2d 527 (1983).

  18. State v. Fudge
    42 S.W.3d 226 Tex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)May 17, 2001

    Illinois v. Gates, 462 U.S. 213, 230-31 , 103 S.Ct. 2317 , 76 L.Ed.2d 527 (1983); Shaffer v. State, 562 S.W.2d 853, 855 (Tex.Crim.App.1978); Davis v. State, 794 S.W.2d 123, 125 (Tex.App.—Austin 1990, pet. ref’d).

  19. Elardo v. State
    163 S.W.3d 760 Tex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)April 27, 2005

    Illinois v. Gates, 462 U.S. 213, 236 , 103 S.Ct. 2317 , 76 L.Ed.2d 527 (1983). Our determination of the sufficiency of an arrest or search warrant is limited to the four corners of the affidavit. Oubre v.

  20. Commonwealth v. Torres
    764 A.2d 532 Supreme Court of PennsylvaniaJanuary 18, 2001

    Upton, 466 U.S. 727, 728 , 104 S.Ct. 2085 , 80 L.Ed.2d 721 (1984) (citing Illinois v. Gates, 462 U.S. 213 , 103 S.Ct. 2317 , 76 L.Ed.2d 527 (1983)).

  21. United States v. Bynum
    125 F. Supp. 2d 772 E.D. VirginiaDecember 19, 2000

    Williamson, 86 F.3d 1154 , 1996 WL 293170 , *6 (4th Cir.1996) (unpublished), citing Illinois v. Gates, 462 U.S. 213 , 103 S.Ct. 2317 , 76 L.Ed.2d 527 (1983).

  22. Ex Parte Shaver
    894 So. 2d 781 Supreme Court of AlabamaJune 11, 2004

    The Court stated: "` Illinois v. Gates , 462 U.S. 213 [, 103 S.Ct. 2317 , 76 L.Ed.2d 527 ] (1983), dealt with an anonymous tip in the probable-cause context. The Court there abandoned the "two-pronged test" of Aguilar v.

  23. State v. Fisher
    154 P.3d 455 Supreme Court of KansasMarch 16, 2007

    As the Supreme Court stated in Illinois v.

  24. State v. Griggs
    2001 MT 211, 34 P.3d 101 Montana Supreme CourtOctober 23, 2001

    Illinois v. Gates (1983), 462 U.S. 213, 232 , 103 S.Ct. 2317, 2329 , 76 L.Ed.2d 527, 544 . By definition, there cannot be a precise recipe for Mulligan Stew.

  25. United States v. Tuter
    240 F.3d 1292 Tenth CircuitMarch 1, 2001

    Illinois v. Gates, 462 U.S. 213, 238 , 103 S.Ct. 2317 , 76 L.Ed.2d 527 (1983). We have stated that a magistrate judge’s decision to issue a warrant is “entitled to ‘great deference’ ” from the reviewing court. United States v.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list