Citing references: Illinois v. Gates

490 So. 2d 104 District Court of Appeal of FloridaMay 2, 1986

Whether or not there were under the facts of a particular case sufficient indicia in this respect can be determined, I believe, by applying the test set forth in Illinois v. Gates, 462 U.S. 213, 233 , 103 S.Ct. 2317, 2329 , 76 L.Ed.2d 527, 545 (1983).

State v. Butler

655 So. 2d 1123 Supreme Court of FloridaJune 1, 1995

Accordingly, we must determine whether the First District's analysis is consistent with the "totality of circumstances" analysis for determining probable cause as adopted in Illinois v. Gates, 462 U.S. 213 , 103 S.Ct. 2317 , 76 L.Ed.2d 527 (1983).

State v. Colitto

929 So. 2d 654 District Court of Appeal of FloridaMay 17, 2006

Gates, 462 U.S. 213, 238 , 103 S.Ct. 2317 , 76 L.Ed.2d 527 (1983) ("we conclude that it is wiser to abandon the `two-pronged test' established by our decisions in Aguilar and Spinelli.

Bennett v. State

111 So. 3d 983 District Court of Appeal of FloridaMay 6, 2013

Gates, 462 U.S. 213, 239 , 103 S.Ct. 2317 , 76 L.Ed.2d 527 (1983).

Rios v. State

483 So. 2d 39 District Court of Appeal of FloridaJanuary 8, 1986

The test for determining the existence of probable cause based on an informant’s tip is governed by Illinois v. Gates, 462 U.S. 213 , 103 S.Ct. 2317 , 76 L.Ed.2d 527 (1983). There the U.S.

Key v. State

553 So. 2d 301 District Court of Appeal of FloridaNovember 30, 1989

[2] Illinois v. Gates, 462 U.S. 213 , 103 S.Ct. 2317 , 76 L.Ed.2d 527 (1983).

Trotman v. State

581 So. 2d 599 District Court of Appeal of FloridaMarch 15, 1991

Under the standard announced in Illinois v.

Green v. State

946 So. 2d 558 District Court of Appeal of FloridaDecember 8, 2006

See Illinois v. Gates, 462 U.S. 213 , 103 S.Ct. 2317 , 76 L.Ed.2d 527 (1983).

Harris v. State

71 So. 3d 756 Supreme Court of FloridaSeptember 22, 2011

Pringle, 540 U.S. 366, 370 , 124 S.Ct. 795 , 157 L.Ed.2d 769 (2003) (quoting Illinois v. Gates, 462 U.S. 213, 231 , 103 S.Ct. 2317 , 76 L.Ed.2d 527 (1983)).

State v. Gonzalez

884 So. 2d 330 District Court of Appeal of FloridaSeptember 10, 2004

Illinois v. Gates, 462 U.S. 213, 238 , 103 S.Ct. 2317 , 76 L.Ed.2d 527 (1983); see also Alabama v. White, 496 U.S. 325, 325 , 110 S.Ct. 2412 , 110 L.Ed.2d 301 (1990).

State v. Gross

833 So. 2d 777 District Court of Appeal of FloridaFebruary 13, 2002

Illinois v. Gates, 462 U.S. 213, 235-36 , 103 S.Ct. 2317 , 76 L.Ed.2d 527 (1983) (citations omitted). Probable cause is to be determined based on the totality of the circumstances. Id. at 238 , 103 S.Ct. 2317 .

Kimball v. State

801 So. 2d 264 District Court of Appeal of FloridaDecember 12, 2001

Id. at 330 , 110 S.Ct. 2412 ; see also Illinois v. Gates, 462 U.S. 213 , 103 S.Ct. 2317 , 76 L.Ed.2d 527 (1983).

State v. Maya

529 So. 2d 1282 District Court of Appeal of FloridaAugust 30, 1988

This was established in Illinois v.

Roper v. State

588 So. 2d 330 District Court of Appeal of FloridaNovember 7, 1991

In denying the motion to suppress, the trial court relied upon Illinois v. Gates, 462 U.S. 213 , 103 S.Ct. 2317 , 76 L.Ed.2d 527 (1983).

State v. Chen

1 So. 3d 1257 District Court of Appeal of FloridaFebruary 11, 2009

In Illinois v.

Williams v. State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of FloridaOctober 1, 2025

Illinois v. Gates, 462 U.S. 213, 238 , 243 n.13 (1983).

Doorbal v. State

837 So. 2d 940 Supreme Court of FloridaJanuary 30, 2003

Illinois v. Gates, 462 U.S. 213 , 232 n. 10, 103 S.Ct. 2317 , 76 L.Ed.2d 527 (1983) (quoting United States v. Ventresca, 380 U.S. 102, 109 , 85 S.Ct. 741 , 13 L.Ed.2d 684 (1965)). The existence of probable cause is not susceptible to formulaic determination.

Schmitt v. State

563 So. 2d 1095 District Court of Appeal of FloridaJune 13, 1990

Illinois v. Gates, 462 U.S. 213 , 103 S.Ct. 2317 , 76 L.Ed.2d 527 (1983).

Vasquez v. State

491 So. 2d 297 District Court of Appeal of FloridaJuly 8, 1986

Gates, 462 U.S. 213 , 103 S.Ct. 2317 , 76 L.Ed.2d 527 , reh'g denied, 463 U.S. 1237 , 104 S.Ct. 33 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1453 (1983). In Gates , the United States Supreme Court abandoned the rigid "two-pronged test" established in Aguilar v.

Brown v. State

561 So. 2d 1248 District Court of Appeal of FloridaMay 18, 1990

Gates, 462 U.S. 213 , 103 S.Ct. 2317 , 76 L.Ed.2d 527 (1983), departed from that stringent two-pronged test and announced a "totality of circumstances" test.

Jenkins v. State

924 So. 2d 20 District Court of Appeal of FloridaJanuary 25, 2006

Illinois v. Gates, 462 U.S. 213 , 246 n. 14, 103 S.Ct. 2317 , 76 L.Ed.2d 527 (1983). "[A]n informant's `veracity,' `reliability[,]' and `basis of knowledge' are all highly relevant in determining the value of his report."

State v. Enstice

573 So. 2d 340 District Court of Appeal of FloridaOctober 11, 1990

Illinois v. Gates, 462 U.S. 213, 238-239 , 103 S.Ct. 2317, 2332 , 76 L.Ed.2d 527, 548 , reh. denied, 463 U.S. 1237 , 104 S.Ct. 33 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1453 (1983); Schmitt v.

State v. Thomas

960 So. 2d 869 District Court of Appeal of FloridaJuly 13, 2007

Illinois v. Gates, 462 U.S. 213, 230-31 , 103 S.Ct. 2317 , 76 L.Ed.2d 527 (1983); State v. Butler, 655 So.2d 1123, 1125 (Fla.1995).

Burnett v. State

848 So. 2d 1170 District Court of Appeal of FloridaMay 16, 2003

Illinois v. Gates, 462 U.S. 213, 238 , 103 S.Ct. 2317 , 76 L.Ed.2d 527 (1983).

State v. Loredo

129 So. 3d 1188 District Court of Appeal of FloridaJanuary 17, 2014

United States, 393 U.S. 410 , 89 S.Ct. 584 , 21 L.Ed.2d 637 (1969), which has been replaced with the totality of the circumstances test set forth in Illinois v. Gates, 462 U.S. 213 , 103 S.Ct. 2317 , 76 L.Ed.2d 527 (1983).

`/`	Focus the search box
`j` `k`	Next / previous result
`Enter`	Open the selected result
`n` `p`	Next / previous search term in a case
`c`	Copy the citation of the current case
`+` `−`	Larger / smaller reading text
`?`	Show this list