TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Citing references

Opinions citing Smith v. Curran, 472 P.2d 769 (Colo. Ct. App. 1970)

23 citing cases

Negative treatment
Depth Newest Oldest Most cited
Majority opinions only
1 2–3 4–9 10+ times cited
  1. Schuessler v. Wolter
    2012 COA 86, 310 P.3d 151 Colorado Court of AppealsMay 24, 2012

    Curran, 28 Colo.App. 358, 362 , 472 P.2d 769, 771 (1970) (proof of a bad result is not of itself evidence of negligent treatment by a doctor).

  2. Short v. Kinkade
    685 P.2d 210 Colorado Court of AppealsDecember 22, 1983

    See Smith v. Curran, 28 Colo.App. 358 , 472 P.2d 769 (1970). In a case such as this, the standard, as adduced by expert testimony, will be consistent with the level of skill or expertise as represented by the practitioner.

  3. Miller v. Van Newkirk
    628 P.2d 143 Colorado Court of AppealsDecember 31, 1980

    Smith v. Curran, 28 Colo.App. 358 , 472 P.2d 769 (1970).

  4. Kitto v. Gilbert
    570 P.2d 544 Colorado Court of AppealsJuly 28, 1977

    See also Smith v. Curran, 28 Colo.App. 358 , 472 P.2d 769 (1970). DR. GILBERT'S APPEAL I. Timeliness of Filing of Notice of Appeal We reject the Kittos' assertion that Dr.

  5. Mudd v. Dorr
    574 P.2d 97 Colorado Court of AppealsSeptember 15, 1977

    Smith v. Curran, 28 Colo.App. 358 , 472 P.2d 769 (1970).

  6. Holmes v. Gamble
    624 P.2d 905 Colorado Court of AppealsMarch 16, 1981

    See Smith v. Curran, 28 Colo.App. 358 , 472 P.2d 769 (1970). The facts constituting negligent conduct, however, like any other facts, may be proven by circumstantial evidence.

  7. Blake, Jr. v. United States
    D. ColoradoNovember 4, 2020

    App. 1986); Smith v. Curran, 472 P.2d 769 , 770–71 (1970). Defendant was served with plaintiff’s first amended complaint on June 12, 2019, so plaintiff’s deadline for filing a certificate of review was August 12, 2019.

  8. Day v. Johnson
    255 P.3d 1064 Supreme Court of ColoradoMay 31, 2011

    ."); Smith v. Curran, 28 Colo.App. 858 , 362, 472 P.2d 769, 771 (1970) (proof of a bad or lamentable result is not of itself evidence of negligent treatment by a physician).

  9. Hamilton v. Hardy
    549 P.2d 1099 Colorado Court of AppealsMarch 18, 1976

    Smith v. Curran, 28 Colo.App. 358 , 472 P.2d 769 . (2) Failure to Terminate Plaintiff's Prescription Plaintiff next contends that there was sufficient evidence to submit to the jury the issue of whether Dr.

  10. Melville v. Southward
    791 P.2d 383 Supreme Court of ColoradoMay 14, 1990

    Smith v. Curran, 28 Colo.App. 358 , 472 P.2d 769 (1970).

  11. Montana Deaconess Hospital v. Gratton
    545 P.2d 670 Montana Supreme CourtJanuary 22, 1976

    Taylor, 272 N.C. 386 , 158 S.E.2d 339 ; Smith v. Curran, 28 Colo.App. 358 , 472 P.2d 769 ; Steinmetz v. Humphrey, 289 Ky. 709 , 160 S.W.2d 6 ; Haliburton v. General Hosp. Soc. of Connecticut, 133 Conn. 61 48 A.2d 261 ; Lorenz v.

  12. Conrad v. Imatani
    724 P.2d 89 Colorado Court of AppealsApril 17, 1986

    Kerr, 23 Colo.App. 163 , 128 P. 870 (1912); see Smith v. Curran, 28 Colo.App. 358 , 472 P.2d 769 (1970).

  13. Adams v. Leidholdt
    563 P.2d 15 Colorado Court of AppealsApril 25, 1977

    Smith v. Curran, 28 Colo.App. 358 , 472 P.2d 769 (1970). Nevertheless, plaintiff contends that Dr. Leidholdt should be vicariously liable for her injury as the "captain of the ship."

  14. Greene v. Thomas
    662 P.2d 491 Colorado Court of AppealsNovember 26, 1982

    Smith v. Curran, 28 Colo.App. 358 , 472 P.2d 769 (1970). However, plaintiff cites Farrah v.

  15. Locke v. Vanderark
    843 P.2d 27 Colorado Court of AppealsApril 9, 1992

    Smith v. Curran, 28 Colo.App. 358 , 472 P.2d 769 (1970).

  16. Contreras v. St. Luke's Hospital
    78 Cal. App. 3d 919 California Court of AppealMarch 21, 1978

    (Smith v. Curran (1970) 28 Colo.App. 358 [ 472 P.2d 769, 770-772 ]; Montana Deaconess Hospital v. Gratton (1976) 169 Mont. 185 [ 545 P.2d 670, 673 ].)

  17. Caro v. Bumpus
    491 P.2d 606 Colorado Court of AppealsOctober 13, 1971

    Martin, 63 Colo. 220 , 165 P. 256 ; Smith v. Curran, 28 Colo.App. 358 , 472 P. 2d 769 ; McGraw v. Kerr, 23 Colo.App. 163 , 128 P. 870 .

  18. Caron v. Pratt
    336 A.2d 856 Supreme Judicial Court of MaineApril 23, 1975

    Downing, 74 N.M. 423 , 394 P.2d 269 (1964); Smith v. Curran, 28 Colo.App. 358 , 472 P.2d 769 (1970). In view of our conclusion that a verdict for defendant was properly directed, we have no need to discuss the other issues raised by this appeal.

  19. Greenwell v. Gill
    660 P.2d 1305 Colorado Court of AppealsDecember 9, 1982

    Lininger, 87 Colo. 401 , 288 P. 633 (1930); Smith v. Curran, 28 Colo.App. 358 , 472 P.2d 769 (1970).

  20. Sanchez v. Lauffenburger
    784 P.2d 855 Colorado Court of AppealsNovember 16, 1989

    See Smith v. Curran, 28 Colo.App. 358 , 472 P.2d 769 (1970). The plaintiff contends, and we agree, that the trial court abused its discretion in ruling that the plaintiff’s expert witness was not competent to testify as to the standard of care of dentists.

  21. Life Insurance Co. of the Southwest v. Overstreet
    603 S.W.2d 780 Texas Supreme CourtJune 25, 1980
  22. Zartner v. Miller
    Tenth CircuitJanuary 9, 2019 Unpublished

    Curran, 472 P.2d 769, 771 (Colo. App. 1970) (requiring expert testimony because “the cause of an infection” is a matter lying “within the field of medical experts”). 11 Mr. Zartner did not present this testimony.

  23. Harris v. United States
    D. ArizonaJune 8, 2021

    Rptr. 647, 655 (Calif. 1978) (res ipsa loquitur not applicable merely because an 1 infection developed after orthopedic surgery); Smith v. Curran, 472 P.2d 769 , 770-772 2 (Colo. App. 1970) (same); Montana Deaconess Hospital v.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list