Citing references
Opinions citing Hirahara v. Tanaka, 959 P.2d 830 (Haw. 1998)
15 citing cases
-
58 P.3d 1196 Hawaii Supreme CourtDecember 18, 2002 Concurring in Part, Dissenting in Part
Hirahara v. Tanaka, 87 Hawai'i 460, 462 , 959 P.2d 830, 832 , reconsideration denied, 87 Hawai'i 460 , 959 P.2d 830 (1998) (citing Craft v. Peebles, 78 Hawai'i 287, 302 , 893 P.2d 138, 153 (1995)).
-
38 P.3d 95 Hawaii Supreme CourtDecember 11, 2001
Hirahara v. Tanaka, 87 Hawai'i 460, 462 , 959 P.2d 830, 832 , reconsideration denied, 87 Hawai'i 460 , 959 P.2d 830 (1998) (citing Craft v. Peebles, 78 Hawai'i 287, 302 , 893 P.2d 138, 153 (1995)).
-
87 A.3d 285 Supreme Court of PennsylvaniaFebruary 7, 2014
Tanaka, 87 Hawai’i 460, 959 P.2d 830, 834 (1998) (explaining that an “error in judgment” instruction, with its propensity to confuse a jury, need not be given when such instruction “is adequately covered by alternate instructions that a physician’s liability cannot
-
216 P.3d 671 Court of Appeals of KansasSeptember 11, 2009
His or her exercise of `best judgment' is superfluous to the determination." 87 Hawai`i at 465, 959 P.2d 830 . Similarly, in Bickham v.
-
255 P.3d 1064 Supreme Court of ColoradoMay 31, 2011
Tanaka, 87 Hawai'i 460 , 959 P.2d 830, 834 (1998) (rejecting a jury instruction stating that "a physician is not necessarily liable for an 'error in judgment'"); Peters v.
-
2007 SD 87, 738 N.W.2d 510 South Dakota Supreme CourtAugust 15, 2007
Greenwich Gynecology and Obstetrics, P.C., 6 Conn.App. 340 , 505 A.2d 436, 440 (1986); Hirahara v. Tanaka, 87 Hawai'i 460 , 959 P.2d 830, 834 (1998); Peters v. Vander Kooi, 494 N.W.2d 708, 712 (Iowa 1993); Bickham v.
-
980 A.2d 159 Superior Court of PennsylvaniaAugust 31, 2009
Univ. of West Virginia Bd. of Trustees, 209 W.Va. 487, 496-97 , 549 S.E.2d 681, 689-92 (2001); Hirahara v. Tana-ka, 87 Hawai'i 460, 464 , 959 P.2d 830, 834 (1998); Rooney v.
-
44 P.3d 274 Hawaii Supreme CourtApril 8, 2002
Hirahara v.
-
334 Conn. 823 Supreme Court of ConnecticutMarch 10, 2020
See Hirahara v. Tanaka, 87 Haw. 460 , 464–65, 959 P.2d 830 (1998) (improper word- ing of acceptable alternatives charge was harmful where charge was central to issue of liability); Rogers v.
-
317 P.3d 664 Hawaii Supreme CourtDecember 27, 2013 Dissent
See, e.g., Hirahara v. Tanaka, 87 Hawai'i 460, 464 , 959 P.2d 830, 835 (1998) (stating that the term "best judgment” should be avoided in future medical malpractice jury instructions); Garringer v.
-
26 P.3d 721 Court of Appeals of KansasJune 22, 2001
Tanaka, 87 Hawai'i 460, 465 , 959 P.2d 830 (1998) (relevant standard of care is objective; jury must focus on whether physician breached that standard of care; informing jury that physician not negligent for utilizing best judgment to choose among acceptable alternatives
-
550 P.3d 1265 Hawaii Intermediate Court of AppealsJune 28, 2024
Univ. of Hawaiʻi, 97 Hawaiʻi 376, 386, 38 4 NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAIʻI REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER P.3d 95, 105 (2001) (quoting Hirahara v. Tanaka, 87 Hawaiʻi 460, 462, 959 P.2d 830, 832 (1998)).
-
972 P.2d 287 Hawaii Supreme CourtDecember 14, 1998
*291 Hirahara v. Tanaka, 87 Hawai‘i 460, 463, 959 P.2d 830, 833 (1998) (citations omitted) (brackets and emphases in original).
-
776 A.2d 1270 Supreme Court of New HampshireJune 22, 2001
Tanaka, 959 P.2d 830, 834-35 (Haw. 1998) (rejecting use of “error in judgment” because language inadequately explains law). But see Watson v.
-
Hawaii Supreme CourtOctober 16, 2017
Univ. of Haw., 97 Hawai#i 376, 386, 38 P.3d 95, 105 (2001) (quoting Hirahara v. Tanaka, 87 Hawai#i 460, 462-63, 959 P.2d 830, 832-33 (1998)). C.