TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Citing references

Opinions citing Ornelas v. United States, 517 U.S. 690 (1996)

6,075 citing cases

Negative treatment
Depth Newest Oldest Most cited
Majority opinions only
1 2–3 4–9 10+ times cited
  1. Grimm v. State
    183 A.3d 167 Court of Appeals of MarylandApril 20, 2018

    In Ornelas v. United States , 517 U.S. 690 , 691, 116 S.Ct. 1657 , 134 L.Ed.2d 911 (1996), the Supreme Court held that the ultimate questions of reasonable suspicion and probable cause are to be reviewed de novo.

  2. United States v. Smith
    423 F.3d 25 First CircuitSeptember 9, 2005

    United States, 517 U.S. 690 , 116 S.Ct. 1657 , 134 L.Ed.2d 911 (1996). 30 The government does not challenge the district court's findings of historic fact.

  3. United States v. Michael Johnson
    256 F.3d 895 Ninth CircuitJuly 20, 2001

    Nelson, Silverman, Gould and Paez) concludes that, under Ornelas v. United States, 517 U.S. 690 , 116 S.Ct. 1657 , 134 L.Ed.2d 911 (1996), the determination of the curtilage must be reviewed de novo on appeal.

  4. State v. Weisler, State v. King
    2011 VT 96, 35 A.3d 970 Supreme Court of VermontSeptember 16, 2011 Concurring in Part, Dissenting in Part

    Keohane, 516 U.S. 99 (1995), and Ornelas v. United States, 517 U.S. 690 (1996).

  5. Willie Lee Douglas v. State of Texas
    Tex. App. Ct., 9th Dist. (Beaumont)April 10, 2002

    Ornelas v. United States , 517 U.S. 690, 695-96 , 116 S.Ct. 1657, 1661-62 , 134 L.Ed.2d 911, 918-19 (1996).

  6. Detention of Petersen v. State
    42 P.3d 952 Washington Supreme CourtMarch 21, 2002

    However, the United States Supreme Court clarified the issue in 1996 in Ornelas v. United States, 517 U.S. 690, 695 , 116 S.Ct. 1657 , 134 L.Ed.2d 911 (1996). Ornelas distinguished between two types of determinations made at probable cause hearings.

  7. Maurice Gasaway v. Commonwealth of Kentucky
    Kentucky Supreme CourtJune 14, 2023

    at 49 (citing Ornelas v. United States, 517 U.S. 690, 698-99 (1996)). The heightened de novo standard of review for probable cause reflects this Court’s “preference for searches pursuant to a warrant.” Id. at 48.

  8. United States v. Wright
    582 F.3d 199 First CircuitSeptember 23, 2009

    Ornelas v. United States, 517 U.S. 690, 699 , 116 S.Ct. 1657 , 134 L.Ed.2d 911 (1996).

  9. State v. Aaberg
    2006 SD 58, 718 N.W.2d 598 South Dakota Supreme CourtJune 28, 2006

    Ornelas v. United States, 517 U.S. 690, 695 , 116 S.Ct. 1657, 1661 , 134 L.Ed.2d 911 (1996).

  10. United States v. Lenin M. Jerez and Carlos M. Solis
    108 F.3d 684 Seventh CircuitMay 19, 1997 Dissent

    United States v. Ornelas-Ledesma, 16 F.3d 714, 719 (7th Cir.1994).

  11. State v. Brockman
    528 S.E.2d 661 Supreme Court of South CarolinaFebruary 22, 2000

    United States, 517 U.S. 690 , 116 S.Ct. 1657 , 134 L.Ed.2d 911 (1996)? (2) Did the Court of Appeals correctly rule that Defendant had a legitimate expectation of privacy in the moped kept at his mother’s residence?

  12. McKenna v. Edgell
    617 F.3d 432 Sixth CircuitAugust 17, 2010

    United States, [ 517 U.S. 690, 697-99 , 116 S.Ct. 1657 , 134 L.Ed.2d 911 (1996)], we do not defer to the jury's legal conclusion that those facts violate the Constitution. Muehler v. Mena, 544 U.S. 93 , 98 n. 1, 125 S.Ct. 1465 , 161 L.Ed.2d 299 (2005).

  13. United States v. D.F.
    115 F.3d 413 Seventh CircuitMay 12, 1997

    United States, — U.S. -, 116 S.Ct. 1657 , 134 L.Ed.2d 911 (1996). Upon receiving the direction of the Supreme Court, we considered the statements of the parties filed pursuant to Circuit Rule 54.

  14. United States v. Alton Mills
    122 F.3d 346 Seventh CircuitAugust 8, 1997

    Mills’ petition for a writ of certiorari, vacated our earlier judgment and remanded the ease to this court for reconsideration in light of the Court’s intervening decision in Ornelas v. United States, —U.S.-, 116 S.Ct. 1657 , 134 L.Ed.2d 911 (1996).

  15. People v. Wear
    867 N.E.2d 1027 Appellate Court of IllinoisJanuary 19, 2007

    In Ornelas v. United States, 517 U.S. 690, 691 , 134 L. Ed. 2d 911, 916 , 116 S.

  16. United States v. McIntire
    516 F.3d 576 Seventh CircuitFebruary 15, 2008

    Its resolution may well be correct—or at least the best that any intermediate appellate court can do, given the tension that the panel agrees is inherent in Ornelas v. United States, 517 U.S. 690 , 116 S.Ct. 1657 , 134 L.Ed.2d 911 (1996).

  17. People v. Cromer
    15 P.3d 243 California Supreme CourtJanuary 22, 2001

    United States, supra, 517 U.S. 690 , 116 S.Ct. 1657 , 134 L.Ed.2d 911 ( Ornelas ) (involving the Fourth Amendment right against unreasonable searches and seizures).

  18. In re GO
    727 N.E.2d 1003 Illinois Supreme CourtMarch 23, 2000

    Ornelas v. United States, 517 U.S. 690, 699 , 116 S.Ct. 1657, 1663 , 134 L.Ed.2d 911, 920 (1996). The Court explained that de novo review was justified for three reasons.

  19. Boggs v. Dir. of Revenue
    564 S.W.3d 693 Missouri Court of AppealsOctober 9, 2018

    Dir. of Revenue , 321 S.W.3d 298 , 310 (Mo. banc 2010) (citing Ornelas v. United States , 517 U.S. 690 , 695 n.3, 697, 699, 116 S.Ct. 1657 , 134 L.Ed.2d 911 (1996) ).

  20. United States v. McCoy
    513 F.3d 405 Fourth CircuitJanuary 25, 2008

    Ornelas v. United States, 517 U.S. 690, 699 , 116 S.Ct. 1657 , 134 L.Ed.2d 911 (1996).

  21. United States v. Harold Castle
    825 F.3d 625 D.C. CircuitJune 14, 2016

    Ornelas v. United States, 517 U.S. 690, 697, 699 , 116 S.Ct. 1657 , 134 L.Ed.2d 911 (1996); see also United States v. Bailey, 622 F.3d 1, 5 (D.C. Cir. 2010).

  22. Kosilek v. Spencer
    774 F.3d 63 First CircuitDecember 16, 2014 Dissent

    See Ornelas v. United States, 517 U.S. 690, 699 , 116 S.Ct. 1657 , 134 L.Ed.2d 911 (1996); United States v. Camacho, 661 F.3d 718, 724 (1st Cir.2011).

  23. Cartnail v. State
    753 A.2d 519 Court of Appeals of MarylandJune 14, 2000

    See Ornelas v. United States, 517 U.S. 690, 696-98, 699 , 116 S.Ct. 1657, 1661-63, 1663 , 134 L.Ed.2d 911, 919-20 (1996). See also Ferris, 355 Md. at 368 , 735 A.2d at 497 .

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list