TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Citing references

Opinions citing Ornelas v. United States, 517 U.S. 690 (1996)

6,075 citing cases · 136 match your filters

Negative treatment
Depth Newest Oldest Most cited
Majority opinions only
1 2–3 4–9 10+ times cited
  1. United States v. Mask
    330 F.3d 330 Fifth CircuitMay 1, 2003

    United States, 517 U.S. 690 , 116 S.Ct. 1657 , 134 L.Ed.2d 911 (1996) requires us to review such questions de novo.

  2. United States v. Donnie Lamont Blount Gaylin Terod Johnson
    98 F.3d 1489 Fifth CircuitOctober 22, 1996

    Ornelas v. United States, 517 U.S. 690 , ----, 116 S.Ct. 1657, 1663 , 134 L.Ed.2d 911 (1996).

  3. United States v. Joe Castillo
    804 F.3d 361 Fifth CircuitSeptember 11, 2015

    See Ornelas v. United States, 517 U.S. 690, 699 , 116 S.Ct. 1657 , 134 L.Ed.2d 911 (1996). The evidence is viewed in the light most favorable to the prevailing party in the district court — in this case, the Government. See United States v.

  4. United States v. Robert Dale Nichols
    142 F.3d 857 Fifth CircuitJuly 6, 1998

    Ornelas v. United States, 517 U.S. 690, 698-99 , 116 S.Ct. 1657, 1663 , 134 L.Ed.2d 911 (1996); Inocencio, 40 F.3d at 721 . In this context, the Fifth Circuit reviews findings of fact for clear error.

  5. United States v. Tuggle
    284 F. App'x 218 Fifth CircuitJuly 14, 2008 Unpublished

    at 430 (citing Ornelas v. United States, 517 U.S. 690, 699 , 116 S.Ct. 1657 , 134 L.Ed.2d 911 (1996)); see also United States v. Holloway, 962 F.2d 451, 459 (5th Cir.1992).

  6. United States v. Eleuterio Lopez-Moreno, Also Known as Eleuterio Lopez
    420 F.3d 420 Fifth CircuitAugust 8, 2005

    Ornelas v. United States, 517 U.S. 690, 699 , 116 S.Ct. 1657 , 134 L.Ed.2d 911 (1996). However, in carrying out this de novo review, we must "give due weight to inferences drawn from those facts by resident judges and local law enforcement officers."

  7. United States v. Tompkins
    130 F.3d 117 Fifth CircuitDecember 1, 1997

    Ornelas v. United States, - U.S. -, 116 S.Ct. 1657 , 134 L.Ed.2d 911 (1996). See infra note 5 and accompanying text. 2 . United States v. Jenkins, 46 F.3d 447, 451 (5th Cir.1995) (citing United States v.

  8. United States v. Saucedo-Munoz
    307 F.3d 344 Fifth CircuitSeptember 23, 2002

    Ornelas v. United States, 517 U.S. 690, 696 , 116 S.Ct. 1657 , 134 L.Ed.2d 911 (1996).

  9. United States v. Pompa
    434 F.3d 800 Fifth CircuitDecember 30, 2005

    Ornelas v. United States, 517 U.S. 690, 696 , 116 S.Ct. 1657 , 134 L.Ed.2d 911 (1996).

  10. United States v. Alvarez
    40 F.4th 339 Fifth CircuitJuly 13, 2022

    See, e.g., Ornelas v. United States, 517 U.S. 690, 699 , 116 S.

  11. United States v. Jeffrey Freeman
    914 F.3d 337 Fifth CircuitJanuary 25, 2019

    " *342 Ornelas v. United States, 517 U.S. 690 , 699, 116 S.Ct. 1657 , 134 L.Ed.2d 911 (1996). "The district court's ruling should be upheld if there is any reasonable view of the evidence to support it." United States v.

  12. United States v. Swan
    259 F. App'x 656 Fifth CircuitDecember 17, 2007 Unpublished

    Ornelas v. United States, 517 U.S. 690, 699 , 116 S.Ct. 1657 , 134 L.Ed.2d 911 (1996). 8 . United States v. Lopez-Moreno, 420 F.3d 420, 429-30 (5th Cir.2005) (quoting Payne v.

  13. United States v. Baudelio Sanchez-Mendoza
    434 F. App'x 319 Fifth CircuitJuly 5, 2011 Unpublished

    Ornelas v. United States, 517 U.S. 690, 699 , 116 S.Ct. 1657 , 134 L.Ed.2d 911 (1996); e.g., United States v. Santiago, 410 F.3d 193, 197 (5th Cir. 2005).

  14. United States v. Brigham
    382 F.3d 500 Fifth CircuitAugust 19, 2004

    Gonzalez, 328 F.3d 755, 758 (5th Cir.2003) (citing Ornelas v. United States, 517 U.S. 690, 699 , 116 S.Ct. 1657, 1663 , 134 L.Ed.2d 911 (1996) (other citations omitted)). The evidence is considered in the light most favorable to the prevailing party. Id.

  15. United States v. Brigham
    382 F.3d 500 Fifth CircuitAugust 18, 2003

    Gonzalez, 328 F.3d 755, 758 (5th Cir.2003) (citing Ornelas v. United States, 517 U.S. 690, 699 , 116 S.Ct. 1657, 1663 , 134 L.Ed.2d 911 (1996) (other citations omitted)). The evidence is considered in the light most favorable to the prevailing party. Id.

  16. United States v. Blount
    123 F.3d 831 Fifth CircuitOctober 24, 1996

    Ornelas v. United States, ___ U.S. ___, 116 S. Ct. 1657, 1663 (1996).

  17. Casanova v. City of Brookshire
    119 F. Supp. 2d 639 S.D. TexasSeptember 7, 2000

    See Ornelas v. United States, 517 U.S. 690, 696-97 , 116 S.Ct. 1657, 1661-62 , 134 L.Ed.2d 911 (1996); United States v. Maslanka, 501 F.2d 208, 212 (5th Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 912 , 95 S.Ct. 1567 , 43 L.Ed.2d 777 (1975).

  18. Tamez v. City of San Marcos
    118 F.3d 1085 Fifth CircuitAugust 25, 1997

    Ornelas v. United States, 517 U.S. 690 , ----, 116 S.Ct. 1657, 1661-62 , 134 L.Ed.2d 911 (1996) (the existence of reasonable suspicion or probable cause are mixed questions of law and fact); United States v.

  19. United States v. Jackson
    390 F.3d 393 Fifth CircuitNovember 9, 2004

    Orozco, 191 F.3d 578, 581 (5th Cir.1999) (citing Ornelas v. United States, 517 U.S. 690, 699 , 116 S.Ct. 1657 , 134 L.Ed.2d 911 (1996)).

  20. United States v. Milton Henry
    853 F.3d 754 Fifth CircuitApril 10, 2017

    Lopez-Moreno, 420 F.3d 420, 430 (5th Cir. 2005) (quoting Ornelas v. United States, 517 U.S. 690, 699 , 116 S.Ct. 1657 , 134 L.Ed.2d 911 (1996)). 3 . Id. (citing United States v. Valadez, 267 F.3d 395, 397 (5th Cir. 2001)). 4 .

  21. United States v. Armando Miranda
    393 F. App'x 243 Fifth CircuitSeptember 1, 2010 Unpublished

    Ornelas v. United States, 517 U.S. 690, 699 , 116 S.Ct. 1657 , 134 L.Ed.2d 911 (1996).

  22. United States v. Martin
    679 F. Supp. 2d 723 W.D. LouisianaJanuary 15, 2010

    (citing Ornelas v. United States, 517 U.S. 690, 696 , 116 S.Ct. 1657 , 134 L.Ed.2d 911 (1996)).

  23. United States v. Santellana
    920 F. Supp. 2d 712 W.D. LouisianaJanuary 30, 2013

    (citing Ornelas v. United States, 517 U.S. 690, 696 , 116 S.Ct. 1657 , 134 L.Ed.2d 911 (1996)).

  24. United States v. Pack
    612 F.3d 341 Fifth CircuitJuly 15, 2010

    Ornelas v. United States, 517 U.S. 690 , 116 S.Ct. 1657, 1663 , 134 L.Ed.2d 911 (1996). “This court may affirm the district court's ruling on a motion to suppress based on any rational supported by the record.” United States v.

  25. United States v. Michael O'keefe, Sr. Eric Schmidt John O'Brien Gary Bennett Paul Schmitz
    128 F.3d 885 Fifth CircuitNovember 11, 1997

    Ornelas v. United States, — U.S. -,-, 116 S.Ct. 1657, 1662 , 134 L.Ed.2d 911 (1996).

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list