TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Citing references

Opinions citing Ornelas v. United States, 517 U.S. 690 (1996)

6,075 citing cases · 26 match your filters

Negative treatment
Depth Newest Oldest Most cited
Majority opinions only
1 2–3 4–9 10+ times cited
  1. State v. Chitty
    559 N.W.2d 511 Nebraska Court of AppealsFebruary 4, 1997

    See Ornelas v. United States, 517 U.S. 690 , 116 S. Ct. 1657 , 134 L.

  2. State v. Sievers - supplemental opinion
    301 Neb. 806, 920 N.W.2d 443 Nebraska Supreme CourtDecember 7, 2018

    Ornelas v. United States , 517 U.S. 690 , 695, 116 S.Ct. 1657 , 134 L.Ed.2d 911 (1996) (quoting Illinois v. Gates , 462 U.S. 213 , 103 S.Ct. 2317 , 76 L.Ed.2d 527 (1983) ).

  3. State v. Eberly
    716 N.W.2d 671 Nebraska Supreme CourtJune 30, 2006

    CONCLUSION When applying the two-stage standard described in Ornelas v. United States, 517 U.S. 690 , 116 S. Ct. 1657 , 134 L. Ed. 2d 911 (1996), we conclude that the trial court properly admitted the disputed evidence.

  4. State v. McCurry
    561 N.W.2d 244 Nebraska Court of AppealsMarch 4, 1997

    Relying on Ornelas v. United States, 517 U.S. 690 , 116 S. Ct. 1657 , 134 L. Ed. 2d 911 (1996), the Nebraska Supreme Court recently decided State v. Konfrst, 251 Neb. 214, 222-23 , 556 N.W.2d 250, 258 (1996), which states: In light of the U.S.

  5. State v. Konfrst
    556 N.W.2d 250 Nebraska Supreme CourtDecember 6, 1996

    Supreme Court’s decision in Ornelas v. U.S.,_U.S._, 116 S. Ct. 1657 , 134 L.

  6. State v. Craven
    571 N.W.2d 612 Nebraska Supreme CourtDecember 19, 1997

    Ornelas v. United States, 517 U.S. 690 , 116 S. Ct. 1657 , 134 L. Ed. 2d 911 (1996).

  7. State v. Chitty
    571 N.W.2d 794 Nebraska Supreme CourtJanuary 16, 1998

    U.S., 517 U.S. 690 , 116 S.Ct. 1657 , 134 L.Ed.2d 911 (1996), which states that determinations of reasonable suspicion for investigative stops and probable cause to perform warrantless searches should be reviewed de novo by appellate courts.

  8. State v. Valdez
    562 N.W.2d 64 Nebraska Court of AppealsMarch 4, 1997

    Ornelas v.

  9. State v. Brooks
    560 N.W.2d 180 Nebraska Court of AppealsFebruary 18, 1997

    See Ornelas v.

  10. State v. GORUP
    782 N.W.2d 16 Nebraska Supreme CourtMay 14, 2010

    [53] See Ornelas v. United States, 517 U.S. 690 , 116 S.Ct. 1657 , 134 L.Ed.2d 911 (1996). [54] See id. [55] Chimel v. California, 395 U.S. 752 , 89 S.Ct. 2034 , 23 L.Ed.2d 685 (1969). [56] See Vale v.

  11. State v. Burdette
    611 N.W.2d 615 Nebraska Supreme CourtJune 9, 2000

    The foregoing standards of review were derived from Ornelas v. United States, 517 U.S. 690 , 116 S. Ct. 1657 , 134 L. Ed. 2d 911 (1996), and first applied by the Nebraska Supreme Court in Konfrst , which was a Fourth Amendment case.

  12. State v. Sheets
    618 N.W.2d 117 Nebraska Supreme CourtSeptember 15, 2000

    Lilly, 527 U.S. at 136 , 119 S.Ct. 1887 , quoting Ornelas v. United States, 517 U.S. 690 , 116 S.Ct. 1657 , 134 L.Ed.2d 911 (1996). The presence or absence of historical facts are reviewed for clear error. Id.

  13. State v. Pittman
    556 N.W.2d 276 Nebraska Court of AppealsNovember 19, 1996

    Supreme Court stated in Ornelas v. United States, 517 U.S. 690, 699 , 116 S. Ct. 1657 , 134 L. Ed. 2d 911 (1996), that as a general matter determinations of reasonable suspicion and probable cause should be reviewed de novo on appeal.

  14. State v. Fernando-Granados
    682 N.W.2d 266 Nebraska Supreme CourtJuly 2, 2004

    Burdette, 259 Neb. 679 , 611 N.W.2d 615 (2000), that appellate review of this Fifth Amendment issue should be governed by the two-stage standard set forth in Ornelas v. United States, 517 U.S. 690 , 116 S. Ct. 1657 , 134 L.

  15. State v. Bakewell
    730 N.W.2d 335 Nebraska Supreme CourtApril 13, 2007

    Stat. § 24-1106 (3) (Reissue 1995). 3 See Ornelas v. United States, 517 U.S. 690 , 116 S. Ct. 1657 , 134 L. Ed. 2d 911 (1996). 4 Cf., U.S. v. Ball, 90 F.3d 260 (8th Cir. 1996); State v.

  16. State v. Nissen
    560 N.W.2d 157 Nebraska Supreme CourtMarch 14, 1997

    Ornelas v. United States, 517 U.S. 690 , 116 S. Ct. 1657 , 134 L. Ed. 2d 911 (1996); Konfrst, supra.

  17. State v. Kelley
    658 N.W.2d 279 Nebraska Supreme CourtMarch 21, 2003

    See, Ornelas v. United States, 517 U.S. 690 , 116 S. Ct. 1657 , 134 L. Ed. 2d 911 (1996); State v. Keup, ante p. 96, 655 N.W.2d 25 (2003); State v. McCleery, 251 Neb. 940 , 560 N.W.2d 789 (1997).

  18. State v. Ray
    609 N.W.2d 390 Nebraska Court of AppealsApril 18, 2000

    Accord Ornelas v. United States, 517 U.S. 690 , 116 S. Ct. 1657 , 134 L. Ed. 2d 911 (1996).

  19. State v. Manning
    638 N.W.2d 231 Nebraska Supreme CourtJanuary 25, 2002

    See, Ornelas v. United States, 517 U.S. 690 , 116 S. Ct. 1657 , 134 L. Ed. 2d 911 (1996); State v. Konfrst, 251 Neb. 214 , 556 N.W.2d 250 (1996).

  20. State v. Runge
    601 N.W.2d 554 Nebraska Court of AppealsOctober 5, 1999

    *725 See Ornelas v. United States, 517 U.S. 690 , 116 S. Ct. 1657 , 134 L. Ed. 2d 911 (1996).

  21. State v. Craven
    560 N.W.2d 512 Nebraska Court of AppealsMarch 18, 1997

    See, also, Ornelas v. United States, 517 U.S. 690 , 116 S. Ct. 1657 , 134 L. Ed. 2d 911 (1996). V.ANALYSIS This appears to be a case of first impression in Nebraska.

  22. State v. Koncaba
    674 N.W.2d 485 Nebraska Court of AppealsFebruary 10, 2004

    See, also, Ornelas v. United States, 517 U.S. 690 , 116 S. Ct. 1657 , 134 L. Ed. 2d 911 (1996); State v. Keup, 265 Neb. 96 , 655 N.W.2d 25 (2003); State v. McCleery, 251 Neb. 940 , 560 N.W.2d 789 (1997).

  23. State v. Griess
    651 N.W.2d 859 Nebraska Court of AppealsSeptember 17, 2002

    See, Ornelas v. United States, 517 U.S. 690 , 116 S. Ct. 1657 , 134 L. Ed. 2d 911 (1996); State v. Manning, supra; State v. Konfrst, 251 Neb. 214 , 556 N.W.2d 250 (1996).

  24. State v. Felder
    Nebraska Court of AppealsJuly 15, 2014 Unpublished

    Gorup, 279 Neb. at 864 , 782 N.W.2d at 34 , quoting Ornelas v. United States, 517 U.S. 690 , 116 S. Ct. 1657 , 134 L. Ed. 2d 911 (1996). The trial court’s determination on this is due no deference from an appellate court. State v.

  25. State v. McCleery
    560 N.W.2d 789 Nebraska Supreme CourtMarch 7, 1997

    Supreme Court’s decision in Ornelas v. U.S., _U.S. _, 116 S. Ct. 1657 , 134 L.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list