TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Citing references

Opinions citing Whitlock v. State, 185 S.E.2d 90 (Ga. Ct. App. 1971)

31 citing cases

Negative treatment
Depth Newest Oldest Most cited
Majority opinions only
1 2–3 4–9 10+ times cited
  1. Whitlock v. State
    198 S.E.2d 865 Supreme Court of GeorgiaJune 21, 1973

    State, 124 Ga. App. 599 (1971) ( 185 SE2d 90 ).

  2. Green v. State
    194 S.E.2d 678 Court of Appeals of GeorgiaDecember 5, 1972

    S. 57, 58 (44 SC 445, *715 68 LE 898); Whitlock v. State, 124 Ga. App. 599, 602 ( 185 SE2d 90 ); Trujillo v. United States, 294 F2d 583 (10th Cir., 1961); United States v. Von Roeder, 435 F2d 1004 (1) (10th Cir., 1971); Molina v.

  3. Wells v. Commonwealth
    371 S.E.2d 19 Court of Appeals of VirginiaJuly 5, 1988

    Hampton, 198 Colo. 566 , 603 P.2d 135 (1979) (no standing to object to search after fleeing scene and abandoning vehicle); Whitlock v. State, 124 Ga. App. 599 , 185 S.E.2d 90 (1971); Hunt v.

  4. Underhill v. State
    198 S.E.2d 703 Court of Appeals of GeorgiaApril 13, 1973

    App. 664 ( 194 SE2d 680 ); Whitlock v. State, 124 Ga. App. 599 ( 185 SE2d 90 ); Williams v. State, 125 Ga. App. 170 (1) ( 186 SE2d 756 ). The same circumstances obtain here.

  5. Quick v. State
    228 S.E.2d 592 Court of Appeals of GeorgiaJuly 15, 1976

    The defendant in a criminal case cannot compel the discovery and inspection of evidence in the possession of the state. Whitlock v. State, 124 Ga. App. 599 ( 185 SE2d 90 ). However, Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.

  6. Jefferson v. State
    220 S.E.2d 71 Court of Appeals of GeorgiaOctober 7, 1975

    Whitlock v. State, 124 Ga. App. 599, 602 ( 185 SE2d 90 ). 2. Appellant urges that the permission to search was illegally obtained, and all items seized thereunder were the result of an illegal search and seizure.

  7. State v. Childs
    519 P.2d 854 Arizona Supreme CourtMarch 8, 1974

    Edwards (5th Cir., 1971), 441 F.2d 749 , and Whitlock v. State, 124 Ga. App. 599 , 185 S.E.2d 90 (1971), that the appellee’s right to Fourth Amendment protection came to an end when he abandoned his vehicle and fled on foot.

  8. Mobley v. State
    202 S.E.2d 465 Court of Appeals of GeorgiaOctober 25, 1973

    Headnote 2 of Whitlock v. State, 124 Ga. App. 599 ( 185 SE2d 90 ) succinctly states, "There is no statute or rule of practice allowing a defendant in a criminal case pretrial discovery and inspection of evidence in possession of the State.”

  9. Preyer v. State
    369 So. 2d 901 Court of Criminal Appeals of AlabamaApril 17, 1979

    Whitlock v. State, 124 Ga.App. 599 , 185 S.E.2d 90 . The search of a vehicle was held valid where a rape and kidnap suspect was arrested some ninety yards from a vehicle which police knew had been used to kidnap the victim. Moore v.

  10. Rautenstrauch v. State
    199 S.E.2d 613 Court of Appeals of GeorgiaJune 15, 1973

    State, 226 Ga. 46 (1) ( 172 SE2d 395 ); Whitlock v. State, 124 Ga. App. 599 (2) ( 185 SE2d 90 ). The trial court properly denied the defendants’ motion for discovery. 2. The defendants filed general demurrers to the indictment on several grounds.

  11. Gondor v. State
    200 S.E.2d 477 Court of Appeals of GeorgiaSeptember 17, 1973

    App. 57 ( 179 SE2d 286 ); Whitlock v. State, 124 Ga. App. 599, 602 (3c) ( 185 SE2d 90 ); Miller v. State, 127 Ga. App. 248 ( 192 SE2d 915 ); Satterfield v. State, 127 Ga. App. 528 (4) ( 194 SE2d 295 ).

  12. Cooper v. State
    330 S.E.2d 402 Court of Appeals of GeorgiaApril 2, 1985

    Whitlock v. State, 124 Ga. App. 599, 602 ( 185 SE2d 90 ) (1971); Jefferson v. State, 136 Ga. App. 63 ( 220 SE2d 71 ) (1975). The trial court therefore correctly denied the motion to suppress. 2.

  13. Duncan v. State
    366 A.2d 1058 Court of Special Appeals of MarylandDecember 28, 1976

    ‘By this voluntary election, he lost his constitutional protection against the search and seizure of his car/ ” See also Whitlock v. State, 124 Ga. App. 599 , 185 S.E.2d 90 (1971), and State v. Achter, 512 S.W.2d 894 (Mo. App. 1974).

  14. Johnson v. State
    700 S.E.2d 612 Court of Appeals of GeorgiaAugust 19, 2010

    App. 509, 510 (1) ( 493 SE2d 193 ) (1997). 19 Whitlock v. State, 124 Ga. App. 599, 602 (3) (b) ( 185 SE2d 90 ) (1971), rev’d in part on other grounds, 230 Ga. 700 ( 198 SE2d 865 ) (1973). 20 Powell v. State, 270 Ga.

  15. Reed v. State
    190 S.E.2d 587 Court of Appeals of GeorgiaMay 17, 1972

    Whitlock v. State, 124 Ga. App. 599, 602 ( 185 SE2d 90 ), citing Carroll v. United States, 267 U. S. 132 (45 SC 280, 69 LE 543, 39 ALR 790 ). 3. Code Ann. § 27-313 (a) (2) (Ga.

  16. Joan Wilkerson, Next of Kin and of the Estate of Harrell Wilkerson Jr. v. Augusta Hospital D/B/A as Trinity Hospital
    Court of Appeals of GeorgiaOctober 6, 2015

    .”); Whitlock v. State, 124 Ga. App. 599, 601 (1) ( 185 SE2d 90 ) (1971) (“A nunc pro tunc entry of a certificate for immediate review cannot revive a right of appeal which has expired.”).

  17. Tina Key v. Melissa Renee
    Court of Appeals of GeorgiaJanuary 8, 2019

    .”); see also Whitlock v. State, 124 Ga.

  18. Eric J. Riviere v. State
    Court of Appeals of GeorgiaFebruary 11, 2019

    Whitlock v. State, 124 Ga. App. 599, 601 (1) ( 185 SE2d 90 ) (1971).

  19. William Scott Fusci v. State
    Court of Appeals of GeorgiaMarch 26, 2019

    App. 214, 214 ( 230 SE2d 503 ) (1976) (an untimely application for immediate review cannot be revived by amendment); Whitlock v. State, 124 Ga.

  20. James B. Hill v. City of Roswell
    Court of Appeals of GeorgiaApril 11, 2019

    See, e. g., Whitlock v. State, 124 Ga. App. 599, 599 (1) ( 185 SE2d 90 ) (1971) (a certificate of immediate review issued nunc pro tunc is of no effect). Accordingly, we lack jurisdiction over this application, which is hereby DISMISSED.

  21. Samuel Prior v. State
    Court of Appeals of GeorgiaAugust 26, 2019

    See Whitlock v. State, 124 Ga.

  22. Kenneth Harold Jackson v. State
    Court of Appeals of GeorgiaFebruary 6, 2020

    .”); see also Whitlock v. State, 124 Ga.

  23. Joseph Albert Parker v. State
    Court of Appeals of GeorgiaMarch 13, 2020

    .”); see also Whitlock v. State, 124 Ga.

  24. State v. Elsey
    588 P.2d 844 Court of Appeals of ArizonaSeptember 19, 1978

    Edwards, 441 F.2d 749 (5th Cir. 1971); Whitlock v. State, 124 Ga.App. 599 , 185 S.E.2d 90 (1971). Finally, appellants claim there was insufficient evidence to convict them of conspiracy. We do not agree.

  25. Elite Rad Radiology Services, Inc v. Isaac Oppong
    Court of Appeals of GeorgiaOctober 11, 2024

    cannot be revived by amendment); Whitlock v. State, 124 Ga.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list