TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Citing references

Opinions citing Radowick v. State, 244 S.E.2d 346 (Ga. Ct. App. 1978)

81 citing cases

  1. Jackson v. State
    382 S.E.2d 177 Court of Appeals of GeorgiaMay 4, 1989

    In Radowick v. State, 145 Ga. App. 231 ( 244 SE2d 346 ) (1978), this court found that “where detention exceeded 40 minutes, it tortures the English language to say it was a ‘brief’ stop or ‘momentary detention.’ ” Id. at 238-239 (3).

  2. State v. Smith
    296 S.E.2d 141 Court of Appeals of GeorgiaOctober 13, 1982

    Radowick v. State, 145 Ga. App. 231, 233 ( 244 SE2d 346 ) (1978). At the time Agent Markonni initially accosted Smith, no record evidence suggests, nor does the state assert, the existence of probable cause to seize Smith or his effects.

  3. Jones v. State
    267 S.E.2d 323 Court of Appeals of GeorgiaMarch 18, 1980

    The trial court found that the detention of appellant was legal, being based on articulable facts and founded suspicion that appellant possessed contraband, and we agree ( Radowick v. State, 145 Ga. App. 231, 236 ( 244 SE2d 346 )).

  4. State v. Key
    296 S.E.2d 60 Court of Appeals of GeorgiaOctober 25, 1982

    App. 142 (2) ( 296 SE2d 141 ) (decided October 13, 1982); Radowick v. State, 145 Ga. App. 231 ( 244 SE2d 346 ). See Terry v. Ohio, 392 U. S. 1 (88 SC 1868, 20 LE2d 889).

  5. Pupo v. State
    371 S.E.2d 219 Court of Appeals of GeorgiaJune 22, 1988

    The appellants contend that the trooper’s conduct in obtaining Pupo’s consent must be considered coercive pursuant to this court’s decision in Radowick v. State, 145 Ga. App. 231 ( 244 SE2d 346 ) (1978). We disagree.

  6. Schmidt v. State
    372 S.E.2d 440 Court of Appeals of GeorgiaJuly 7, 1988

    As in Radowick v. State, 145 Ga. App. 231 , supra, the detention of defendant constituted an arrest. To say that the detention of defendant was a justifiable Terry stop stretches the imagination.

  7. 359 S.E.2d 752 Court of Appeals of GeorgiaJuly 14, 1987

    This court in Radowick v. State, 145 Ga. App. 231 ( 244 SE2d 346 ), followed the holding of United States v. Brignoni-Ponce, 422 U.

  8. Lane v. State
    545 S.E.2d 665 Court of Appeals of GeorgiaFebruary 19, 2001

    Lane cites Radowick v. State, 145 Ga. App. 231 ( 244 SE2d 346 ) (1978), in support of his contention that the 20-min-ute detention exceeded a brief stop.

  9. State v. Golden
    318 S.E.2d 693 Court of Appeals of GeorgiaMay 1, 1984

    S. 143, 146 (92 SC 1921, 32 LE2d 612) (1972); Radowick v. State, 145 Ga. App. 231, 233 ( 244 SE2d 346 ) (1978).

  10. Bowers v. State
    258 S.E.2d 623 Court of Appeals of GeorgiaJune 28, 1979

    Radowick v. State, 145 Ga. App. 231, 237 ( 244 SE2d 346 ) (1978). As in Radowick , the detention here overreached its purpose and thus became an illegal arrest.

  11. Biggers v. State
    290 S.E.2d 159 Court of Appeals of GeorgiaApril 7, 1982

    [Cit.] ” Radowick v. State, 145 Ga. App. 231, 233 ( 244 SE2d 346 ).

  12. Riviera v. State
    380 S.E.2d 353 Court of Appeals of GeorgiaMarch 17, 1989

    Relying upon Radowick v. State, 145 Ga. App. 231 ( 244 SE2d 346 ), defendant also argues that the consent to search the van was obtained by coercion because he was detained “an inordinate period of time.” Id. at 242 . We disagree.

  13. 431 S.E.2d 715 Court of Appeals of GeorgiaMay 24, 1993

    Radowick v. State, 145 Ga. App. 231, 237 (3) ( 244 SE2d 346 ) (1978); see also Bowers v. State, 151 Ga. App. 46 ( 258 SE2d 623 ) (1979), aff’d 245 Ga. 367 ( 265 SE2d 57 ) (1980).

  14. Ates v. State
    270 S.E.2d 455 Court of Appeals of GeorgiaJune 12, 1980

    In Radowick v. State, *98 145 Ga.

  15. 302 S.E.2d 591 Court of Appeals of GeorgiaFebruary 25, 1983

    Radowick v. State, 145 Ga. App. 231, 233 ( 244 SE2d 346 ) (1978).

  16. 420 S.E.2d 67 Court of Appeals of GeorgiaJune 10, 1992

    State, 145 Ga.

  17. Hudgins v. State
    374 S.E.2d 566 Court of Appeals of GeorgiaOctober 14, 1988

    Radowick v. State, 145 Ga. App. 231 (1) ( 244 SE2d 346 ). Such suspicion must be reasonable and articulable. Id. However, a police officer, as well as all citizens, have the liberty to question other persons. United States v. Mendenhall, 446 U.

  18. 281 S.E.2d 341 Court of Appeals of GeorgiaMay 20, 1981

    Radowick v. State, 145 Ga. App. 231 (1) ( 244 SE2d 346 ).

  19. Howell v. State
    287 S.E.2d 294 Court of Appeals of GeorgiaNovember 4, 1981

    See Radowick v. State, 145 Ga. App. 231 (1) ( 244 SE2d 346 ). The only issue is whether the officer had a “reasonable apprehension” that Howell was armed or dangerous so as to justify his detention and the “Terry-type” search. Radowick, supra, p. 237 .

  20. 312 S.E.2d 40 Supreme Court of GeorgiaDecember 5, 1983

    See Radowick v. State, 145 Ga. App. 231, 237 ( 244 SE2d 346 ) (1978). Detention beyond that authorized by Terry is an arrest, and, to be constitutional, such an arrest must be supported by probable cause. United States v. Berry, 670 F2d 583 (5th Cir. 1982).

  21. Morgan v. State
    394 S.E.2d 639 Court of Appeals of GeorgiaMay 25, 1990

    State, 259 Ga. 227, 228 ( 378 SE2d 853 ); DiSanti v. State, supra; Radowick v. State, 145 Ga. App. 231, 238 ( 244 SE2d 346 ). Detention beyond that authorized by a Terry stop is an arrest and no formal procedures are required. Williams v.

  22. 454 U.S. 924 Supreme CourtOctober 13, 1981

    Kea , 61 Haw. 566 , 606 P.2d 1329 (1980); Radowick v. State , 145 Ga.App. 231 , 244 S.E.2d 346 (1978); Henighan v. United States , 433 A.2d 1059 (D.C.App.1981); State v. Webb , 398 So.2d 820 (Fla.1981); State v. Hasenbank , 425 A.2d 1330 (Me.1981); Mann v.

  23. State v. Sieler
    621 P.2d 1272 Washington Supreme CourtDecember 31, 1980

    See Radowick v. State, 145 Ga. App. 231 , 244 S.E.2d 346 (1978); State v. Hobson, 95 Idaho 920 , 523 P.2d 523 (1974); State v. Barton, 92 N.M. 118 , 584 P.2d 165 (1978). But see United States v. McLeroy, 584 F.2d 746 (5th Cir.1978) (Wisdom, J.)

  24. 457 A.2d 877 Superior Court of PennsylvaniaFebruary 4, 1983

    Barton, 92 N.M. 118 , 584 P.2d 165 (1978); Radowick v. State, 145 Ga.App. 231 , 244 S.E.2d 346 (1978); State v. Hobson, 95 Idaho 920 , 523 P.2d 523 (1974); People v. Taggart, 20 N.Y.2d 335 , 283 N.Y.S.2d 1 , 229 N.E.2d 581 (1967). See also: Commonwealth v.

  25. State v. Gibbons
    547 S.E.2d 679 Court of Appeals of GeorgiaMarch 30, 2001

    [24] Radowick v. State, 145 Ga.App. 231, 237 , 244 S.E.2d 346 (1978). [25] See United States v. Sharpe, 470 U.S. 675, 685-686 , 105 S.Ct. 1568 , 84 L.Ed.2d 605 (1985) ("the purpose underlying a Terry stop [is] investigating possible criminal activity.").

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list