TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Citing references

Opinions citing State v. Swift, 207 S.E.2d 459 (Ga. 1974)

78 citing cases

  1. Capote v. State
    908 S.E.2d 540 Supreme Court of GeorgiaOctober 31, 2024

    State v. Swift, 232 Ga. 535, 536 ( 207 SE2d 459 ) (1974). Second, the trial court’s decision with regard to questions of fact and credibility must be accepted unless clearly erroneous. Woodruff v.

  2. Brimer v. State
    411 S.E.2d 128 Court of Appeals of GeorgiaOctober 3, 1991

    See State v. Swift, supra at 536. Judgment affirmed. Pope and Cooper, JJ., concur.

  3. 497 S.E.2d 367 Supreme Court of GeorgiaMarch 16, 1998

    State v. Swift, 232 Ga. 535 (1), 207 S.E.2d 459 (1974).

  4. Allen v. State
    232 S.E.2d 250 Court of Appeals of GeorgiaNovember 30, 1976

    State v. Swift, 232 Ga. 535 ( 207 SE2d 459 ) (1974). Code Ann. § 92A-9906 makes it a criminal offense for a driver to refuse to exhibit his license to a police officer upon request.

  5. Jones v. State
    245 S.E.2d 449 Court of Appeals of GeorgiaMay 3, 1978

    State v. Swift, 232 Ga. 535 ( 207 SE2d 459 ) (1974), and its "any evidence rule," are not applicable in this case; instead, the proper standard for review is the "clearly erroneous" test.

  6. Tate v. State
    440 S.E.2d 646 Supreme Court of GeorgiaFebruary 28, 1994

    State v. Swift, 232 Ga. 535, 536 ( 207 SE2d 459 ) (1974). Second, the trial court's decision with regard to questions of fact and credibility must be accepted unless clearly erroneous. Woodruff v. State, 233 Ga. 840, 844 ( 213 SE2d 689 ) (1975).

  7. Lowe v. State
    446 S.E.2d 532 Court of Appeals of GeorgiaJuly 20, 1994

    State v. Swift, 232 Ga. 535, 536 ( 207 SE2d 459 ) (1974). “Second, the trial court’s decision with regard to questions of fact and credibility must be accepted unless clearly erroneous. Woodruff v. State, 233 Ga. 840, 844 ( 213 SE2d 689 ) (1975).

  8. 215 S.E.2d 479 Court of Appeals of GeorgiaApril 7, 1975

    App. 57 (2) ( 179 SE2d 286 ); *638 State v. Swift, 232 Ga. 535 (1) ( 207 SE2d 459 ). Submitted January 14, 1975 Decided April 7, 1975 Rehearing denied April 28, 1975 Smith & Harrington, Will Ed Smith, for appellant. Albert D.

  9. Little v. State
    479 A.2d 903 Court of Appeals of MarylandAugust 21, 1984

    Supp. 876 (D.N.M. 1983) (same); State v. Swift, 232 Ga. 535 , 207 S.E.2d 459 (1974) (sustaining validity of license and registration checkpoint set up outside a rock music concert); State v. Roberson, 165 Ga.

  10. Shy v. State
    218 S.E.2d 599 Supreme Court of GeorgiaSeptember 2, 1975

    See also, State v. Swift, 232 Ga. 535 ( 207 SE2d 459 ) (1974). In Brisbane , a limited investigative inquiry was found to be justified.

  11. State v. Golden
    318 S.E.2d 693 Court of Appeals of GeorgiaMay 1, 1984

    See State v. Swift, 232 Ga. 535 (1) ( 207 SE2d 459 ) (1974); State v. Roberson, 165 Ga. App. 727 (1) ( 302 SE2d 591 ) (1983).

  12. 211 S.E.2d 294 Supreme Court of GeorgiaDecember 3, 1974

    State v. Swift, 232 Ga. 535 ( 207 SE2d 459 ) (1974). Code Ann. § 92A-9906 makes it a criminal offense for a driver to refuse to exhibit his license to a police officer upon request.

  13. Mims v. State
    410 S.E.2d 824 Court of Appeals of GeorgiaSeptember 23, 1991

    State v. Swift, 232 Ga. 535, 536 ( 207 SE2d 459 ). Applying this standard of review, the evidence shows that this was a valid roadblock and not a pretext for stopping Mims’ vehicle.

  14. Orkin v. State
    223 S.E.2d 61 Supreme Court of GeorgiaJanuary 27, 1976

    State v. Swift, 232 Ga. 535 (1) ( 207 SE2d 459 ) (1974); Wilson v. Hopper, 234 Ga. 859, 863 ( 218 SE2d 573 ) (1975).

  15. Sewell v. State
    233 S.E.2d 187 Supreme Court of GeorgiaFebruary 23, 1977

    The seizure here comes within the plain view doctrine as held in State v. Swift, 232 Ga. 535 (2) ( 207 SE2d 459 ) (1974), quoting from Brisendine v. State, 130 Ga. App. 249 (1) ( 203 SE2d 308 ) (1973).

  16. Megar v. State
    241 S.E.2d 447 Court of Appeals of GeorgiaJanuary 4, 1978

    App. 713, 714 ( 231 SE2d 384 ); State v. Swift, 232 Ga. 535, 536 (1) ( 207 SE2d 459 ). The evidence satisfied this standard, and the foregoing enumerations of error are therefore without merit. 2.

  17. Pupo v. State
    371 S.E.2d 219 Court of Appeals of GeorgiaJune 22, 1988

    See generally State v. Swift, 232 Ga. 535, 536 ( 207 SE2d 459 ) (1974). 2. The appellants contend that, even assuming that the initial detention of the vehicle was valid, the trooper was without probable cause to conduct a search. We agree.

  18. Cains v. State
    555 So. 2d 290 Court of Criminal Appeals of AlabamaSeptember 29, 1989

    Swift , 232 Ga. 535 , 207 S.E.2d 459 (1974) (license and registration roadblock at the entrance to a rock festival), we do not believe that this roadblock was characterized by such abuse or was established as a pretext or subterfuge.

  19. Shirley v. State
    304 S.E.2d 468 Court of Appeals of GeorgiaApril 18, 1983

    State v. Swift, 232 Ga. 535, 536 (1) ( 207 SE2d 459 ) (1974). In the instant case two police officers testified that Shirley consented to a search of the car he was driving; Shirley denied giving such consent.

  20. Ward v. State
    387 S.E.2d 150 Court of Appeals of GeorgiaSeptember 28, 1989

    State v. Swift, 232 Ga. 535, 536 ( 207 SE2d 459 ) (1974).

  21. Evans v. State
    586 S.E.2d 400 Court of Appeals of GeorgiaAugust 12, 2003

    State v. Swift, 232 Ga. 535, 536 (1) ( 207 SE2d 459 ) (1974). 2 (Citation and footnote omitted.) State v. Wilson, 257 Ga. App. 120 ( 570 SE2d 409 ) (2002). 3 (Citation omitted.) Parker v. State, 233 Ga.

  22. Birge v. State
    239 S.E.2d 395 Court of Appeals of GeorgiaOctober 7, 1977

    State v. Swift, 232 Ga. 535, 536 ( 207 SE2d 459 ) (1974); Smith v. Hornbuckle, 140 Ga. App. 871 ( 232 SE2d 149 ) (1977). (c) Appellant contends that the description of the place and persons to be searched is ambiguous and overbroad.

  23. 572 S.E.2d 76 Court of Appeals of GeorgiaOctober 4, 2002

    State v. Swift, 232 Ga. 535, 536 ( 207 SE2d 459 ) (1974). Second, the trial court’s decision with regard to “questions of fact and credibility . . . must be accepted unless clearly erroneous.” Woodruff v.

  24. 273 S.E.2d 881 Court of Appeals of GeorgiaOctober 1, 1980

    State v. Swift, 232 Ga. 535, 536 (1) ( 207 SE2d 459 ) (1974); Williams v. State, 148 Ga. App. 55 (2) ( 250 SE2d 848 ) (1978).

  25. State v. Brown
    366 S.E.2d 816 Court of Appeals of GeorgiaMarch 2, 1988

    State v. Swift, 232 Ga. 535, 536 ( 207 SE2d 459 ) (1974). "Credibility of witnesses, resolution of any conflict or inconsistency, and weight to be accorded testimony [are] solely the province of the judge on a motion to suppress." Rogers v. State, 155 Ga.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list