Citing references
Opinions citing Gilreath v. State, 279 S.E.2d 650 (Ga. 1981)
135 citing cases
-
523 S.E.2d 619 Court of Appeals of GeorgiaOctober 18, 1999
The State relies solely on the Supreme Court of Georgia’s decision in Gilreath v. State, 247 Ga. 814 ( 279 SE2d 650 ) (1981), to support its contention that this police entry was lawful. But Gilreath is *393 inapposite here.
-
284 S.E.2d 422 Supreme Court of GeorgiaNovember 24, 1981
State, 247 Ga. 219 ( 275 SE2d 29 ) (1981); Gilreath v. State, 247 Ga. 814 ( 279 SE2d 650 ) (1981).
-
340 S.E.2d 891 Supreme Court of GeorgiaMarch 18, 1986
Gilreath v. State, 247 Ga. 814 (15) ( 279 SE2d 650 ) (1981). Nor can the trial court mention this subject to the jury. Tucker v. State, 244 Ga. 721 (11) ( 261 SE2d 635 ) (1979). Consequently, we find no error. 37.
-
303 S.E.2d 266 Supreme Court of GeorgiaMay 24, 1983
State, supra at 875, 876; Gilreath v. State, 247 Ga. 814 (15) ( 279 SE2d 650 ) (1981); Thomas v. State, 240 Ga. 393 (7) ( 242 SE2d 1 ) (1977); Prevatte v. State, 233 Ga. 929 (6) ( 214 SE2d 365 ) (1975).
-
298 S.E.2d 10 Supreme Court of GeorgiaNovember 10, 1982
Gilreath v. State, 247 Ga. 814, 834 ( 279 SE2d 650 ) (1981); Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.
-
300 S.E.2d 301 Supreme Court of GeorgiaFebruary 16, 1983
Compare Gilreath v. State, 247 Ga. 814 (19) ( 279 SE2d 650 ) (1981).
-
519 S.E.2d 907 Supreme Court of GeorgiaSeptember 13, 1999
State, 269 Ga. 797, 807 (6), 505 S.E.2d 731 (1998); Gilreath v. State, 247 Ga. 814, 824 (3), 279 S.E.2d 650 (1981); Wilson v. State, 212 Ga. 73, 74 , 90 S.E.2d 557 (1955); Goodroe v. State, 224 Ga.App. 378, 380 (1), 480 S.E.2d 378 (1997).
-
387 S.E.2d 606 Court of Appeals of GeorgiaOctober 27, 1989
Gilreath v. State, 247 Ga. 814 , supra. See also Gravely v. State, 181 Ga. App. 400 ( 352 SE2d 589 ). It follows that the trial court erred in sustaining defendant’s motion to suppress evidence. Judgment reversed. Carley, C.
-
480 S.E.2d 378 Court of Appeals of GeorgiaJanuary 28, 1997
Gilreath v. State, 247 Ga. 814, 824 ( 279 SE2d 650 ) (1981); Wilson, supra; see Bowden v. State, 202 Ga. App. 802, 803 ( 415 SE2d 527 ) (1992).
-
469 S.E.2d 796 Court of Appeals of GeorgiaMarch 8, 1996
The State’s reliance on Gilreath v. State, 247 Ga. 814 (1) ( 279 SE2d 650 ) (1981) is misplaced, as that case involved officers responding to a request to locate a missing person last seen at the house in question.
-
341 S.E.2d 280 Court of Appeals of GeorgiaFebruary 10, 1986
Accord Gilreath v. State, 247 Ga. 814, 824 , supra. Accordingly, since no harm was shown to have resulted to the defendant as a result of his absence during the colloquy, this enumeration of error is without merit. 2.
-
315 S.E.2d 893 Supreme Court of GeorgiaMay 22, 1984
In Gilreath v. State, 247 Ga. 814 (1) ( 279 SE2d 650 ) (1981), this court upheld the constitutionality of a warrantless search following the entry into a house in search of the victim, and resulting in the seizure of objects in plain view.
-
555 S.E.2d 879 Court of Appeals of GeorgiaOctober 31, 2001
Gilreath v. State, 247 Ga. 814, 835 (15) ( 279 SE2d 650 ) (1981); Hernandez v. State, 244 Ga. App. 874, 876 (1) (a) ( 537 SE2d 149 ) (2000). See Gilreath, supra; Hernandez, supra; Moore v. State, 242 Ga. App. 249, 251-252 (1) (b) ( 529 SE2d 381 ) (2000).
-
463 U.S. 992 Supreme CourtJuly 6, 1983
S. 935 (1972); Gilreath v. State, 247 Ga. 814 , 279 S. E. 2d 650 (1981), cert. denied, 456 U. S. 984 (1982); People v. Szabo, 94 Ill. 2d 327 , 447 N. E. 2d 193 (1983); Farmer v. Commonwealth, 450 S. W. 2d 494 (Ky. 1970); State v.
-
691 P.2d 929 Washington Supreme CourtDecember 28, 1984
Sheppard, 331 A.2d 142 (Del. 1974); Gilreath v. State, 247 Ga. 814 , 279 S.E.2d 650 (1981); Brewer v. State, 275 Ind. 338 , 417 N.E.2d 889 (1981); State v. Myles, 389 So.2d 12 (La. 1979); Tichnell v. State, 287 Md. 695 , 415 A.2d 830 (1980); State v.
-
312 S.E.2d 40 Supreme Court of GeorgiaDecember 5, 1983
First, although the accused has the right to be present at all stages of his or her trial, Gilreath v. State, 247 Ga. 814, 824 (3) ( 279 SE2d 650 ) (1981), cert. denied 456 U. S. 984 (102 SC 2258, 72 LE2d 862); Wilson v.
-
646 A.2d 1318 Supreme Court of ConnecticutJuly 26, 1994
See, e.g., Gilreath v. State, 247 Ga. 814 , 279 S.E.2d 650 (1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 984 , 102 S. Ct. 2258 , 72 L. Ed. 2d 862 (1982); State v. Ramseur, 106 N.J. 123 , 524 A.2d 188 (1987); Commonwealth v.
-
680 A.2d 147 Supreme Court of ConnecticutJuly 30, 1996
“See, e.g., Gilreath v. State, 247 Ga. 814 , 279 S.E.2d 650 (1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 984 , 102 S. Ct. 2258 , 72 L. Ed. 2d 862 (1982); State v. Ramseur, 106 N.J. 123 , 524 A.2d 188 (1987); Commonwealth v.
-
301 S.E.2d 234 Supreme Court of GeorgiaMarch 16, 1983
Gilreath v. State, 247 Ga. 814 (15) ( 279 SE2d 650 ) (1981).
-
319 S.E.2d 420 Supreme Court of GeorgiaJuly 2, 1984
Gilreath v. State, 247 Ga. 814 (15) ( 279 SE2d 650 ) (1981). It does not, however, require that we reverse a death penalty simply because some portion of the closing argument might have been subject to some objection never made. See Mincey v.
-
456 U.S. 984 Supreme CourtMay 17, 1982
Reported below: No. 81-5379, 399 So. 2d 964 ; No. 81-5562, 247 Ga. 814 , 279 S. E. 2d 650 ; No. 81-5784, 403 So. 2d 418 ; No. 81-5848, 277 S. C. 53, 283 S.
-
697 F.2d 955 Eleventh CircuitMay 3, 1983
State, 248 Ga. 558 , 284 S.E.2d 390, 396 (1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1038 , 102 S.Ct. 1741 , 72 L.Ed.2d 155 (1982); Gilreath v. State, 247 Ga. 814 , 279 S.E.2d 650, 670 (1981).
-
323 S.E.2d 801 Supreme Court of GeorgiaNovember 27, 1984
Horton v. State, supra; Gilreath v. State, 247 Ga. 814 (5) ( 279 SE2d 650 ) (1981); see Ross v. State, 238 Ga. 445 ( 233 SE2d 381 ) (1977). Enumeration 21 therefore is without merit. 3.
-
40 P.3d 139 Supreme Court of KansasDecember 28, 2001
Florida, 358 So.2d 826, 828-29 (Fla.), cert. denied 439 U.S. 959 (1978); Gilreath v. Georgia, 247 Ga. 814, 840 , 279 S.E.2d 650 (1981), cert. denied 456 U.S. 984 (1982); Lowery v.
-
350 S.E.2d 446 Supreme Court of GeorgiaDecember 2, 1986
State, supra, 253 Ga. at 348-49; Gilreath v. State, 247 Ga. 814 (15) ( 279 SE2d 650 ) (1981). The court views the prosecutor’s argument with disfavor, but we hold that it does not sink to the level of reversible error.