Citing references
Opinions citing Caffo v. State, 279 S.E.2d 678 (Ga. 1981)
78 citing cases
-
596 S.E.2d 822 Court of Appeals of North CarolinaMay 4, 2004
Caffo v. State, 247 Ga. 751 (2)(b), 279 S.E.2d 678 (1981). In addition, the magistrate was entitled to rely on the officer's knowledge of appellant's past criminal conduct. Id. at 755 , 279 S.E.2d 678 .
-
362 S.E.2d 342 Supreme Court of GeorgiaNovember 19, 1987
State, supra, 256 Ga. at 235-236; Caffo v. State, 247 Ga. 751, 757 (3) ( 279 SE2d 678 ) (1981).
-
398 S.E.2d 702 Court of Appeals of GeorgiaSeptember 4, 1990
Caffo v. State, 247 Ga. 751 (2) (b) ( 279 SE2d 678 ) (1981). In addition, the magistrate was entitled to rely on the officer’s knowledge of appellant’s past criminal conduct. Id. at 755 .
-
679 S.E.2d 831 Court of Appeals of GeorgiaJune 10, 2009
Caffo v. State, 247 Ga. 751, 754-755 (2) (b) ( 279 SE2d 678 ) (1981). The same is also true of DFACS personnel. Smith, supra, 274 Ga. App. at 108-109 (1).
-
729 S.E.2d 437 Court of Appeals of GeorgiaJune 15, 2012
See also Caffo v. State, 247 Ga. 751, 755 (2) (c) ( 279 SE2d 678 ) (1981) (suspect’s past criminal conduct can be used to support probable cause to issue a search warrant).
-
492 S.E.2d 185 Supreme Court of GeorgiaOctober 6, 1997
Arline, supra at 844 (2); Caffo v. State, 247 Ga. 751, 757 (3) ( 279 SE2d 678 ) (1981). Gilliam also urges that his statement was inadmissible because he was not advised of his Miranda rights until after he confessed.
-
514 S.E.2d 1 Supreme Court of GeorgiaMarch 1, 1999
State, 247 Ga. 751, 756-757 (3) ( 279 SE2d 678 ) (1981) (telling a suspect he would “feel better” if he confessed is not a “hope of benefit” under OCGA § 24-3-50).
-
525 S.E.2d 339 Supreme Court of GeorgiaNovember 1, 1999
State, 264 Ga. 843 (2), 452 S.E.2d 115 (1995); Caffo v. State, 247 Ga. 751 , 279 S.E.2d 678 (1981). We find no error in the trial court's ruling as to the absence of an inducement by a hope of benefit.
-
9 S.W.3d 3 Missouri Court of AppealsDecember 21, 1999
Morrill, 205 Conn. 560 , 534 A.2d 1165, 1170 (1987); Caffo v. State, 247 Ga. 751 , 279 S.E.2d 678, 681 (1981); State v. Alger, 100 Idaho 675 , 603 P.2d 1009, 1013 (1979). Dudley, 819 S.W.2d at 54-55 .
-
347 S.E.2d 553 Supreme Court of GeorgiaSeptember 3, 1986
Caffo v. State, 247 Ga. 751 ( 279 SE2d 678 ) (1981). In Caffo v.
-
485 S.E.2d 492 Supreme Court of GeorgiaJune 9, 1997
Caffo v. State, 247 Ga. 751, 757 ( 279 SE2d 678 ) (1981). The *110 State bears the burden of demonstrating the voluntariness of a confession by a preponderance of the evidence. Bright v. State, 265 Ga. 265, 280 (5) (b) ( 455 SE2d 37 ) (1995).
-
443 S.E.2d 616 Supreme Court of GeorgiaMay 31, 1994
State, 247 Ga. 751, 757 ( 279 SE2d 678 ) (1981); OCGA § 24-3-50, was not a threat, and was not otherwise reasonably likely to induce a fear of injury if Gober invoked his right to counsel, see § 24-3-50.
-
543 S.E.2d 725 Supreme Court of GeorgiaMarch 2, 2001
State; 252 Ga. 168, 176 (6) ( 313 SE2d 73 ) (1984); Caffo v. State, 247 Ga. 751, 755 (3) ( 279 SE2d 678 ) (1981); Tyler v. State, 247 Ga. 119, 121 (2) ( 274 SE2d 549 ) (1981); Fowler v. State, 246 Ga. 256, 258 (4) ( 271 SE2d 168 ) (1980).
-
371 S.E.2d 869 Court of Appeals of GeorgiaJune 23, 1988
Caffo v. State, 247 Ga. 751, 757 ( 279 SE2d 678 ) (1981). See also Cooper v. State, 256 Ga. 234 (2) ( 347 SE2d 553 ) (1986). Appellant was not told that telling the truth would help him in court. See Askea v. State, 153 Ga.
-
660 S.E.2d 521 Supreme Court of GeorgiaApril 14, 2008
State, 256 Ga. 234 (2) ( 347 SE2d 553 ) (1986) (officer’s stated desire to help suspect is not a hope of benefit); Caffo v. State, 247 Ga. 751 (3) ( 279 SE2d 678 ) (1981) (admonition to tell the truth is not a hope of benefit); Richardson v.
-
388 S.E.2d 893 Court of Appeals of GeorgiaNovember 27, 1989
Caffo v. State, 247 Ga. 751 , *681 755 (2) (c) ( 279 SE2d 678 ). Decided November 27, 1989. Murray M. Silver, for appellant. William G. Hamrick, Jr., District Attorney, Monique F. Kirby, *682 Assistant District Attorney, for appellee.
-
616 S.E.2d 868 Court of Appeals of GeorgiaJune 29, 2005
Caffo v. State, 247 Ga. 751, 754-755 (2) (b) ( 279 SE2d 678 ) (1981). See also Crews v. State, 269 Ga.
-
452 S.E.2d 115 Supreme Court of GeorgiaJanuary 23, 1995
Caffo v. State, 247 Ga. 751 ( 279 SE2d 678 ) (1981). The admission of appellant’s statement was not error. Decided January 23, 1995. L. Elizabeth Lane, for appellant. Charles H. Weston, District Attorney, Thomas J.
-
671 S.E.2d 507 Court of Appeals of GeorgiaNovember 26, 2008
Caffo v. State, 247 Ga. 751, 757 (3) ( 279 SE2d 678 ) (1981); Burton v. State, 212 Ga. App. 100, 102 (2) ( 441 SE2d 470 ) (1994). Consequently, being released is not a hope *244 of benefit that would implicate this code section.
-
819 S.W.2d 51 Missouri Court of AppealsOctober 21, 1991
Morrill, 205 Conn. 560 , 534 A.2d 1165, 1170 (1987); Caffo v. State, 247 Ga. 751 , 279 S.E.2d 678, 681 (1981); State v. *55 Alger, 100 Idaho 675 , 603 P.2d 1009, 1013 (1979).
-
293 S.E.2d 496 Court of Appeals of GeorgiaJuly 9, 1982
State, 246 Ga. 648 ( 272 SE2d 348 ); Caffo v. State, 247 Ga. 751, 754 ( 279 SE2d 678 ). These enumerations are not meritorious. 2. Code Ann. § 70-301 (Ga.
-
317 S.E.2d 253 Court of Appeals of GeorgiaMarch 14, 1984
State, 247 Ga. 119, 122 ( 274 SE2d 549 ) (1981); Caffo v. State, 247 Ga. 751, 757 ( 279 SE2d 678 ) (1981); Stephens v. State, 164 Ga. App. 398 (3) ( 297 SE2d 90 ) (1982).
-
383 S.E.2d 378 Court of Appeals of GeorgiaJune 20, 1989
(See Caffo v. State, 247 Ga. 751, 755 ( 279 SE2d 678 ) (1981); Shrader v. State 159 Ga. App. 522, 523, 524 ( 284 SE2d 37 ) (1981)). What facts led to the conclusory fact that Adams was a drug dealer? Under Illinois v. Gates, 462 U.
-
582 S.E.2d 237 Court of Appeals of GeorgiaMay 16, 2003
App. at 293 (7). 10 See Caffo v. State, 247 Ga. 751, 755 (2) (c) ( 279 SE2d 678 ) (1981) (a magistrate may consider a police officer’s knowledge of a suspect’s reputation when deciding whether to issue a search warrant). 11 See, e.g., Fiallo v.
-
447 S.E.2d 68 Court of Appeals of GeorgiaJune 24, 1994 Dissent
See generally Caffo v. State, 247 Ga. 751 (2) (c) ( 279 SE2d 678 ) (1981). These facts plus the detailed description of the residence and subsequent corroboration were sufficient to support the affidavit. See generally Futch v. State, 178 Ga.