Citing references
Opinions citing Pearson v. Callahan, 555 U.S. 223 (2009)
13,482 citing cases
-
911 F.3d 674 Fourth CircuitDecember 19, 2018
Pearson v. Callahan , 555 U.S. 223 , 236, 129 S.Ct. 808 , 172 L.Ed.2d 565 (2009).
-
979 F. Supp. 2d 901 N.D. IowaOctober 25, 2013
Callahan, 555 U.S. 223, 231 , 129 S.Ct. 808 , 172 L.Ed.2d 565 (2009) (quoting Harlow v. Fitzgerald, 457 U.S. 800, 818 , 102 S.Ct. 2727 , 73 L.Ed.2d 396 (1982)); see Burton v. St.
-
888 F. Supp. 2d 1176 D. New MexicoAugust 22, 2012
Pearson v. Callahan, [ 555 U.S. 223 ] 129 S.Ct. 808, 815 [ 172 L.Ed.2d 565 ] (2009)(quoting Hunter v. Bryant, 502 U.S. 224, 227 [ 112 S.Ct. 534 , 116 L.Ed.2d 589 ] (1991)).
-
956 N.E.2d 379 Illinois Supreme CourtAugust 4, 2011
Callahan, 555 U.S. 223 , 129 S.Ct. 808 , 172 L.Ed.2d 565 (2009).
-
Ninth CircuitMay 18, 2021
Katz, 533 U.S. 194 , 201 (2001), overruled in part on other grounds by Pearson v. Callahan, 555 U.S. 223, 236 (2009)).
-
W.D. MichiganDecember 10, 2019
Pearson v. Callahan, 555 U.S. 223, 231-33 (2009); Bishop v. Hackel, 636 F.3d 757, 765 (6th Cir. 2011). The court may exercise its sound discretion in deciding which of the two prongs of the qualified immunity analysis should be addressed first.
-
148 F. Supp. 3d 1232 D. New MexicoDecember 7, 2015
Pearson v. Callahan, 555 U.S. 223, 232 , 129 S.Ct. 808 , 172 L.Ed.2d 565 (2009)(quoting Hunter v.
-
108 F. Supp. 3d 963 D. New MexicoMay 15, 2015
Mitchell, 720 F.2d 162, 172 (D.C.Cir.l983))(internal quotation marks excluded)(citing Pearson v. Callahan, 555 U.S. 223, 236 , 129 S.Ct. 808 , 172 L.Ed.2d 565 (2009)).
-
376 P.3d 33 Idaho Supreme CourtMarch 23, 2016
Pearson v. Callahan, 555 U.S. 223, 241 , 129 S.Ct. 808, 821 , 172 L.Ed.2d 565, 579 (2009). Therefore, we will address the second prong.
-
179 F. Supp. 3d 1006 D. New MexicoJanuary 20, 2016
(citing Pearson v. Callahan, 555 U.S. 223 , 129 S.Ct. 808 , 172 L.Ed.2d 565 (2009) and Robbins v. Oklahoma, 519 F.3d 1242 (10th Cir.2008)); and (ii) where the facts establishing the affirmative defense are apparent on the face of the complaint, see Miller v.
-
351 P.3d 1171 Idaho Supreme CourtMay 21, 2015
Pearson v. Callahan, 555 U.S. 223, 241 , 129 S.Ct. 808, 820-21 , 172 L.Ed.2d 565, 579 (2009). Therefore, we will address the second prong.
-
927 F.3d 575 First CircuitJune 19, 2019
See Pearson v. Callahan , 555 U.S. 223 , 236, 129 S.Ct. 808 , 172 L.Ed.2d 565 (2009).
-
267 P.3d 1022 Court of Appeals of WashingtonDecember 19, 2011
Callahan, 555 U.S. 223, 236-37 , 129 S.Ct. 808 , 172 L.Ed.2d 565 (2009)).
-
275 F. Supp. 3d 1240 D. KansasAugust 4, 2017
Pearson v. Callahan, 555 U.S. 223, 231, 129 S.Ct. 808 , 172 L.Ed.2d 565 (2009) (quoting Harlow v. Fitzgerald, 457 U.S. 800, 818 , 102 S.Ct. 2727 , 73 L.Ed.2d 396 (1982)).
-
563 U.S. 692 Supreme CourtMay 26, 2011
Id., at 242 , 129 S. Ct. 808 , 172 L. Ed. 2d 565 .
-
599 F.3d 129 Second CircuitMarch 16, 2010
Pearson v. Callahan, ___ U.S. ___, 129 S.Ct. 808, 815-16 , 172 L.Ed.2d 565 (2009). [2] To be clearly established, "[t]he contours of the right must be sufficiently clear that a reasonable official would understand that what he is doing violates that right."
-
181 Cal. App. 4th 856 California Court of AppealJanuary 29, 2010
(25) Most significantly, the propriety of resolving the qualified immunity issue at the pleading stage was recently made clear in Pearson v.
-
96 A.3d 221 Court of Appeals of MarylandJuly 22, 2014
See, e.g., Pearson v. Callahan, 555 U.S. 223, 227 , 129 S.Ct. 808, 813 , 172 L.Ed.2d 565, 570 (2009). 33 . Although Pierson v.
-
36 F. Supp. 3d 1067 D. New MexicoJuly 31, 2014
Katz, 533 U.S. 194 , 205, 121 S.Ct. 2151 , 150 L.Ed.2d 272 (2001), receded from by Pearson v. Callahan, 555 U.S. 223 , 129 S.Ct. 808 , 172 L.Ed.2d 565 (2009).
-
249 F. Supp. 3d 963 N.D. IowaApril 17, 2017
Callahan, 555 U.S. 223, 231 , 129 S.Ct. 808 , 172 L.Ed.2d 565 (2009) (quoting Harlow v. Fitzgerald, 457 U.S. 800, 818 , 102 S.Ct. 2727 , 73 L.Ed.2d 396 (1982)); see Burton v. St.
-
987 F. Supp. 2d 1162 D. New MexicoNovember 30, 2013
Pearson v. Callahan, 555 U.S. 223, 232 , 129 S.Ct. 808 , 172 L.Ed.2d 565 (2009) (quoting Hunter v. Bryant, 502 U.S. 224, 227 , 112 S.Ct. 534 , 116 L.Ed.2d 589 (1991) (per curiam)).
-
61 F. Supp. 3d 1085 D. New MexicoNovember 19, 2014
Pearson v. Callahan, 555 U.S. 223, 232 , 129 S.Ct. 808 , 172 L.Ed.2d 565 (2009) (quoting Hunter v. Bryant, 502 U.S. 224, 227 , 112 S.Ct. 534 , 116 L.Ed.2d 589 (1991) (per curiam)).
-
100 F. Supp. 3d 1192 D. New MexicoApril 11, 2015
(citing Pearson v. Callahan, 555 U.S. 223 , 129 S.Ct. 808 , 172 L.Ed.2d 565 (2009); Robbins v. Oklahoma, 519 F.3d 1242 (10th Cir.2008)); and (ii) where the facts establishing the affirmative defense are apparent on the face of the complaint, see Miller v.
-
3 F. Supp. 3d 936 D. New MexicoJanuary 31, 2014
Pearson v. Callahan, 555 U.S. 223, 232 , 129 S.Ct. 808 , 172 L.Ed.2d 565 (2009) (quoting Hunter v. Bryant, 502 U.S. 224, 227 , 112 S.Ct. 534 , 116 L.Ed.2d 589 (1991) (per curiam)).
-
214 F. Supp. 3d 1028 D. New MexicoSeptember 30, 2016
(citing Pearson v. Callahan, 555 U.S. 223 , 129 S.Ct. 808 , 172 L.Ed.2d 565 (2009)); Robbins v. Oklahoma, 519 F.3d 1242 .