TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Citing references

Opinions citing Pearson v. Callahan, 555 U.S. 223 (2009)

13,482 citing cases

  1. 911 F.3d 674 Fourth CircuitDecember 19, 2018

    Pearson v. Callahan , 555 U.S. 223 , 236, 129 S.Ct. 808 , 172 L.Ed.2d 565 (2009).

  2. 979 F. Supp. 2d 901 N.D. IowaOctober 25, 2013

    Callahan, 555 U.S. 223, 231 , 129 S.Ct. 808 , 172 L.Ed.2d 565 (2009) (quoting Harlow v. Fitzgerald, 457 U.S. 800, 818 , 102 S.Ct. 2727 , 73 L.Ed.2d 396 (1982)); see Burton v. St.

  3. 888 F. Supp. 2d 1176 D. New MexicoAugust 22, 2012

    Pearson v. Callahan, [ 555 U.S. 223 ] 129 S.Ct. 808, 815 [ 172 L.Ed.2d 565 ] (2009)(quoting Hunter v. Bryant, 502 U.S. 224, 227 [ 112 S.Ct. 534 , 116 L.Ed.2d 589 ] (1991)).

  4. People v. White
    956 N.E.2d 379 Illinois Supreme CourtAugust 4, 2011

    Callahan, 555 U.S. 223 , 129 S.Ct. 808 , 172 L.Ed.2d 565 (2009).

  5. Ninth CircuitMay 18, 2021

    Katz, 533 U.S. 194 , 201 (2001), overruled in part on other grounds by Pearson v. Callahan, 555 U.S. 223, 236 (2009)).

  6. W.D. MichiganDecember 10, 2019

    Pearson v. Callahan, 555 U.S. 223, 231-33 (2009); Bishop v. Hackel, 636 F.3d 757, 765 (6th Cir. 2011). The court may exercise its sound discretion in deciding which of the two prongs of the qualified immunity analysis should be addressed first.

  7. 148 F. Supp. 3d 1232 D. New MexicoDecember 7, 2015

    Pearson v. Callahan, 555 U.S. 223, 232 , 129 S.Ct. 808 , 172 L.Ed.2d 565 (2009)(quoting Hunter v.

  8. 108 F. Supp. 3d 963 D. New MexicoMay 15, 2015

    Mitchell, 720 F.2d 162, 172 (D.C.Cir.l983))(internal quotation marks excluded)(citing Pearson v. Callahan, 555 U.S. 223, 236 , 129 S.Ct. 808 , 172 L.Ed.2d 565 (2009)).

  9. 376 P.3d 33 Idaho Supreme CourtMarch 23, 2016

    Pearson v. Callahan, 555 U.S. 223, 241 , 129 S.Ct. 808, 821 , 172 L.Ed.2d 565, 579 (2009). Therefore, we will address the second prong.

  10. 179 F. Supp. 3d 1006 D. New MexicoJanuary 20, 2016

    (citing Pearson v. Callahan, 555 U.S. 223 , 129 S.Ct. 808 , 172 L.Ed.2d 565 (2009) and Robbins v. Oklahoma, 519 F.3d 1242 (10th Cir.2008)); and (ii) where the facts establishing the affirmative defense are apparent on the face of the complaint, see Miller v.

  11. 351 P.3d 1171 Idaho Supreme CourtMay 21, 2015

    Pearson v. Callahan, 555 U.S. 223, 241 , 129 S.Ct. 808, 820-21 , 172 L.Ed.2d 565, 579 (2009). Therefore, we will address the second prong.

  12. Eves v. LePage
    927 F.3d 575 First CircuitJune 19, 2019

    See Pearson v. Callahan , 555 U.S. 223 , 236, 129 S.Ct. 808 , 172 L.Ed.2d 565 (2009).

  13. 267 P.3d 1022 Court of Appeals of WashingtonDecember 19, 2011

    Callahan, 555 U.S. 223, 236-37 , 129 S.Ct. 808 , 172 L.Ed.2d 565 (2009)).

  14. 275 F. Supp. 3d 1240 D. KansasAugust 4, 2017

    Pearson v. Callahan, 555 U.S. 223, 231, 129 S.Ct. 808 , 172 L.Ed.2d 565 (2009) (quoting Harlow v. Fitzgerald, 457 U.S. 800, 818 , 102 S.Ct. 2727 , 73 L.Ed.2d 396 (1982)).

  15. 563 U.S. 692 Supreme CourtMay 26, 2011

    Id., at 242 , 129 S. Ct. 808 , 172 L. Ed. 2d 565 .

  16. 599 F.3d 129 Second CircuitMarch 16, 2010

    Pearson v. Callahan, ___ U.S. ___, 129 S.Ct. 808, 815-16 , 172 L.Ed.2d 565 (2009). [2] To be clearly established, "[t]he contours of the right must be sufficiently clear that a reasonable official would understand that what he is doing violates that right."

  17. 181 Cal. App. 4th 856 California Court of AppealJanuary 29, 2010

    (25) Most significantly, the propriety of resolving the qualified immunity issue at the pleading stage was recently made clear in Pearson v.

  18. 96 A.3d 221 Court of Appeals of MarylandJuly 22, 2014

    See, e.g., Pearson v. Callahan, 555 U.S. 223, 227 , 129 S.Ct. 808, 813 , 172 L.Ed.2d 565, 570 (2009). 33 . Although Pierson v.

  19. Reid v. Pautler
    36 F. Supp. 3d 1067 D. New MexicoJuly 31, 2014

    Katz, 533 U.S. 194 , 205, 121 S.Ct. 2151 , 150 L.Ed.2d 272 (2001), receded from by Pearson v. Callahan, 555 U.S. 223 , 129 S.Ct. 808 , 172 L.Ed.2d 565 (2009).

  20. 249 F. Supp. 3d 963 N.D. IowaApril 17, 2017

    Callahan, 555 U.S. 223, 231 , 129 S.Ct. 808 , 172 L.Ed.2d 565 (2009) (quoting Harlow v. Fitzgerald, 457 U.S. 800, 818 , 102 S.Ct. 2727 , 73 L.Ed.2d 396 (1982)); see Burton v. St.

  21. 987 F. Supp. 2d 1162 D. New MexicoNovember 30, 2013

    Pearson v. Callahan, 555 U.S. 223, 232 , 129 S.Ct. 808 , 172 L.Ed.2d 565 (2009) (quoting Hunter v. Bryant, 502 U.S. 224, 227 , 112 S.Ct. 534 , 116 L.Ed.2d 589 (1991) (per curiam)).

  22. 61 F. Supp. 3d 1085 D. New MexicoNovember 19, 2014

    Pearson v. Callahan, 555 U.S. 223, 232 , 129 S.Ct. 808 , 172 L.Ed.2d 565 (2009) (quoting Hunter v. Bryant, 502 U.S. 224, 227 , 112 S.Ct. 534 , 116 L.Ed.2d 589 (1991) (per curiam)).

  23. 100 F. Supp. 3d 1192 D. New MexicoApril 11, 2015

    (citing Pearson v. Callahan, 555 U.S. 223 , 129 S.Ct. 808 , 172 L.Ed.2d 565 (2009); Robbins v. Oklahoma, 519 F.3d 1242 (10th Cir.2008)); and (ii) where the facts establishing the affirmative defense are apparent on the face of the complaint, see Miller v.

  24. 3 F. Supp. 3d 936 D. New MexicoJanuary 31, 2014

    Pearson v. Callahan, 555 U.S. 223, 232 , 129 S.Ct. 808 , 172 L.Ed.2d 565 (2009) (quoting Hunter v. Bryant, 502 U.S. 224, 227 , 112 S.Ct. 534 , 116 L.Ed.2d 589 (1991) (per curiam)).

  25. 214 F. Supp. 3d 1028 D. New MexicoSeptember 30, 2016

    (citing Pearson v. Callahan, 555 U.S. 223 , 129 S.Ct. 808 , 172 L.Ed.2d 565 (2009)); Robbins v. Oklahoma, 519 F.3d 1242 .

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list