Citing references

Both parties rely on the supreme court’s opinion in Sorokolit v. Rhodes, 889 S.W.2d 239 (Tex. 1994).

Sorokolit v. Rhodes, 889 S.W.2d 239, 240 (Tex. 1994). “[T]he substance of the plaintiff’s pleadings determines whether a claim sounds in trespass to try title.” Brumley, 616 S.W.3d at 833.

.”); Sorokolit v. Rhodes, 889 S.W.2d 239 , 242–43 (Tex. 1998) (concluding that claimant could proceed with DTPA claim because claim was premised on physician’s express misrepresentations, not on alleged breach of medical standards).

Sorokolit v. Rhodes, 889 S.W.2d 239, 240 (Tex. 1994). “The trial court has broad discretion in granting special exceptions to order more definite pleadings as a particular case may require.” Perry, 285 S.W.3d at 142 .

See Sorokolit v. Rhodes, 889 S.W.2d 239, 241 (Tex. 1994) (emphasizing that a court may not enlarge Thus, but-for the fortuitous occurrence that A.V.’s conduct was caught on video, A.V.’s discipline was beyond the reach of the District.

Sorokolit v. Rhodes, 889 S.W.2d 239, 240 (Tex. 1994). A trial court’s ruling on special exceptions is reversed only if there has been an abuse of discretion. Connolly, 257 S.W.3d at 838 .

See Sorokolit v. Rhodes, 889 S.W.2d 239, 242 (Tex. 1994).

Campbell, 985 S.W.2d 38, 40 (Tex. 1998); and then citing Sorokolit v. Rhodes, 889 S.W.2d 239, 242 (Tex. 1994)). So, the Court looks to the substance of Shockwave’s sole cause of action.