TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Citing references

Opinions citing Klindtworth v. Burkett, 477 N.W.2d 176 (N.D. 1991)

11 citing cases

  1. 550 N.W.2d 394 North Dakota Supreme CourtMay 29, 1996

    Briggs, 475 U.S. 335, 340 , 106 S.Ct. 1092, 1095 , 89 L.Ed.2d 271 (1986); Klindtworth v. Burkett, 477 N.W.2d 176 , 180 n. 2 (N.D.1991).

  2. Tucker v. Resha
    610 So. 2d 460 District Court of Appeal of FloridaDecember 30, 1992

    See Klindtworth v. Burkett, 477 N.W.2d 176 (N.D. 1991); Pizzato's, Inc. v. City of Berwyn, 168 Ill. App.3d 796 , 119 Ill.Dec. 583 , 523 N.E.2d 51 (1988); Noyola v. Flores, 740 S.W.2d 493 (Tex. Ct. App. 1987).

  3. Tucker v. Resha
    648 So. 2d 1187 Supreme Court of FloridaNovember 10, 1994

    See, e.g., Klindtworth v. Burkett, 477 N.W.2d 176 (N.D. 1991). Still other states have granted relief through different vehicles. See, e.g., McLin v.

  4. 556 N.W.2d 721 Wisconsin Supreme CourtDecember 20, 1996

    Ct. 1959 (1995); Klindtworth v. Burkett, 477 N.W.2d 176 (N.D. 1991); Ohio Civil Serv. Employees Ass'n v. Moritz, 529 *231 N.E.2d 1290 (Ohio Ct. App. 1987); Walden v. City of Seattle, 892 P.2d 745 (Wash. Ct. App. 1995).

  5. 939 P.2d 1013 Montana Supreme CourtJune 24, 1997

    See, e.g., Klindtworth v.

  6. 512 N.W.2d 711 North Dakota Supreme CourtMarch 1, 1994

    E.g., Klindtworth v. Burkett, 477 N.W.2d 176 (N.D.1991). The second requirement is a Rule 54(b) certification by the trial court. Id.; N.D.R.Civ.P. Rule 54(b).

  7. 2003 ND 62, 659 N.W.2d 869 North Dakota Supreme CourtApril 15, 2003

    See, e.g., Klindtworth v. Burkett, 477 N.W.2d 176 , 178 n. 1 (N.D.1991). In Dimond v. State ex rel. State Bd. of Higher Educ., 1999 ND 228, ¶ 12 , 603 N.W.2d 66 , we explained: In Security Nat’l. Bank of Fargo v.

  8. 892 P.2d 745 Court of Appeals of WashingtonApril 3, 1995

    Burkett, 477 N.W.2d 176 (N.D. 1991). 10 RAP 2.3(b) provides for discretionary review only: "(1) If the superior court has committed an obvious error which would render further proceedings useless; or *790 "(2) If the superior court has committed probable

  9. 2015 ND 121, 863 N.W.2d 514 North Dakota Supreme CourtMay 27, 2015

    See, e.g., *521 Klindtworth v. Burkett, 477 N.W.2d 176, 183 (N.D.1991). But “[i]ssues of fact may become issues of law for the court if reasonable persons could reach only one conclusion from the facts.” Groleau v.

  10. 2003 ND 56 North Dakota Supreme CourtApril 15, 2003

    See, e.g. , Klindtworth v. Burkett , 477 N.W.2d 176 , 178 n.1 (N.D. 1991).  In Dimond v. State ex rel. State Bd. of Higher Educ. , 1999 ND 228, ¶ 12 , 603 N.W.2d 66 , we explained: In Security Nat’l. Bank of Fargo v.

  11. 2025 ND 92 North Dakota Supreme CourtMay 8, 2025

    Therefore, the order is not appealable under section 28-27-02, N.D.C.C.” 477 N.W.2d 176, 182 (N.D. 1991); see Pinks v.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list