TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Citing references

Opinions citing Underwriters at Lloyds v. City of Lauderdale Lakes, 382 So. 2d 702 (Fla. 1980)

47 citing cases

Negative treatment
Depth Newest Oldest Most cited
Majority opinions only
1 2–3 4–9 10+ times cited
  1. Holmes Regional Medical Center, Inc. v. Allstate Insurance Company
    225 So. 3d 780 Supreme Court of FloridaJuly 13, 2017

    Underwriters at Lloyds v. City of Lauderdale Lakes, 382 So. 2d 702, 704 (Fla. 1980).

  2. Holmes Regional Medical Center, Inc. v. Allstate Insurance Company – Corrected Opinion
    Supreme Court of FloridaSeptember 7, 2017

    Underwriters at Lloyds v. City of Lauderdale Lakes, 382 So. 2d 702, 704 (Fla. 1980).

  3. Allstate Insurance Co. v. Theodotou
    171 So. 3d 163 District Court of Appeal of FloridaJuly 24, 2015

    See Underwriters at Lloyds v. City of Lauderdale Lakes, 382 So.2d 702, 704 (Fla. 1980) (“The initial tortfeasor is subject to the total financial burden of the victim’s *166 injuries, including those directly attributable to a doctor’s malpractice.”).

  4. ASSOCIATION FOR RETARDED v. Fletcher
    741 So. 2d 520 District Court of Appeal of FloridaJune 18, 1999

    Underwriters at Lloyds v. City of Lauderdale Lakes, 382 So.2d 702, 704 (Fla.1980).

  5. Huet v. Mike Shad Ford, Inc.
    915 So. 2d 723 District Court of Appeal of FloridaDecember 2, 2005

    Underwriters at Lloyds v. City of Lauderdale Lakes, 382 So.2d 702 (Fla. 1980); Stuart v. Hertz Corp., 351 So.2d 703 (Fla.1977).

  6. Benchwarmers, Inc. v. Gorin
    689 So. 2d 1197 District Court of Appeal of FloridaMarch 12, 1997

    Following Underwriters at Lloyds v. City of Lauderdale Lakes, 382 So.2d 702, 704 (Fla.1980), Benchwarmers, as the initial tortfeasor, is subject to the total financial burden of Ruth Gorin's injuries, including those directly attributable to Dr.

  7. Caccavella v. Silverman
    814 So. 2d 1145 District Court of Appeal of FloridaApril 10, 2002

    See Underwriters at Lloyds v. City of Lauderdale Lakes, 382 So.2d 702, 704 (Fla. 1980).

  8. McCutcheon v. Hertz Corp.
    463 So. 2d 1226 District Court of Appeal of FloridaFebruary 13, 1985

    Additionally, after Hertz II, the Supreme Court considered the following question in Underwriters at Lloyds v. City of Lauderdale Lakes, 382 So.2d 702, 703 (Fla. 1980): DOES THE DECISION IN STUART V.

  9. Northern Utilities Division of K N Energy, Inc. v. Town of Evansville
    822 P.2d 829 Wyoming Supreme CourtDecember 10, 1991

    Settling initial tort-feasor rights against a successor tort-feasor where augmented injury existed was pursued in Underwriters at Lloyds v. City of Lauderdale Lakes, 382 So.2d 702 (Fla. 1980).

  10. Don Reid Ford, Inc. v. Feldman
    421 So. 2d 184 District Court of Appeal of FloridaOctober 6, 1982

    Appellant relies on Underwriters at Lloyds v.

  11. Villa Maria Nursing & Rehabilitation Center, Inc. v. South Broward Hospital District
    8 So. 3d 1167 District Court of Appeal of FloridaApril 8, 2009

    See Underwriters at Lloyds v. City of Lauderdale Lakes, 382 So.2d 702, 704 (Fla.1980); Huet v.

  12. University of Miami v. Francois
    76 So. 3d 360 District Court of Appeal of FloridaDecember 21, 2011

    City of Lauderdale Lakes, 382 So.2d 702 (Fla.1980).

  13. MUNSON & ASSOC. v. Doctors Mercy Hosp.
    458 So. 2d 789 District Court of Appeal of FloridaOctober 11, 1984

    Underwriters at Lloyds v. City of Lauderdale Lakes, 382 So.2d 702, 704 (Fla. 1980).

  14. Hertz Corp. v. Stuart
    422 So. 2d 38 District Court of Appeal of FloridaOctober 13, 1982

    In Underwriters at Lloyds v. City of Lauderdale Lakes, 382 So.2d 702 (Fla. 1980), the Supreme Court considered the following certified question from this Court: DOES THE DECISION IN STUART V.

  15. D'AMARIO v. Ford Motor Co.
    806 So. 2d 424 Supreme Court of FloridaNovember 21, 2001

    .; *436 see also Underwriters at Lloyds v. City of Lauderdale Lakes, 382 So.2d 702, 703 (Fla. 1980); Association for Retarded Citizens-Volusia, Inc. v. Fletcher, 741 So.2d 520, 524-25 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999); Dungan v.

  16. West American Ins. Co. v. Yellow Cab Co.
    495 So. 2d 204 District Court of Appeal of FloridaAugust 28, 1986

    See Underwriters at Lloyds v. City of Lauderdale, 382 So.2d 702 (Fla. 1980); Jones v. Williams Steel Industries, Inc., 460 So.2d 1004 (Fla. 5th DCA), rev. denied, 467 So.2d 1000 (Fla. 1984); Allstate Life Ins. Co. v. Weldon, 213 So.2d 15 (Fla. 3d DCA 1968).

  17. Kumar Corp. v. Nopal Lines, Ltd.
    462 So. 2d 1178 District Court of Appeal of FloridaJanuary 15, 1985

    Being legally obliged to pay Nava's loss, Kumar would thus be subrogated to Nava's claims against the appellees. [8] See Underwriters at Lloyds v. City of Lauderdale Lakes, 382 So.2d 702 (Fla. 1980); Trueman Fertilizer Co. v.

  18. Allstate Ins. Co. v. Metropolitan Dade County
    436 So. 2d 976 District Court of Appeal of FloridaAugust 2, 1983

    Underwriters at Lloyds v. City of Lauderdale Lakes, 382 So.2d 702 (Fla. 1980); American Home Assurance Co. v. City of Opa Locka, 368 So.2d 416 (Fla.3d DCA 1979), and cases cited therein.

  19. Kemper National P & C Companies v. Smith
    615 A.2d 372 Superior Court of PennsylvaniaOctober 20, 1992

    Curtin, 596 A.2d 530 (D.C.App.1991) (indemnity); Underwriters at Lloyds v. City of Lauderdale Lakes, 382 So.2d 702 (Fla.1980) (subrogation); Gertz v. Campbell, 55 Ill.2d 84 , 302 N.E.2d 40 (1973) (indemnity); Hunt v.

  20. Rucks v. Pushman
    541 So. 2d 673 District Court of Appeal of FloridaMarch 16, 1989

    NOTES [1] See Underwriters at Lloyds v. City of Lauderdale Lakes, 382 So.2d 702, 704 (Fla. 1980); J. Ray Arnold Lumber Corp. v. Richardson, 105 Fla. 204 , 141 So. 133, 135 (1932).

  21. New Milford Bd. of Educ. v. Juliano
    530 A.2d 43 New Jersey Superior Court App DivisionJuly 10, 1987

    Rptr. 490 (1964); Underwriters at Lloyds v. City of Lauderdale Lakes, 382 So. 2d 702 (Fla. 1980); Gertz v. Campbell, 55 Ill. 2d 84 , 302 N.E. 2d 40 (1973); Hunt v. Ernzen, 252 N.W. 2d 445 (Iowa 1977); Musco v.

  22. Gonzalez v. Leon
    511 So. 2d 606 District Court of Appeal of FloridaJune 16, 1987

    While the proffered instruction correctly states the law applicable to the theory of the plaintiff's case, see Underwriters at Lloyds v. City of Lauderdale Lakes, 382 So.2d 702 (Fla. 1980); Stuart v.

  23. Letzter v. Cephas
    792 So. 2d 481 District Court of Appeal of FloridaJanuary 24, 2001

    See Underwriters at Lloyds v. City of Lauderdale Lakes, 382 So.2d 702, 704 (Fla.1980). The foreseeability rule of Stuart v. Hertz has expressly been held to apply even when the initial tortfeasor is a physician as well. See Davidson v.

  24. National Railroad Passenger Corporation (Amtrak), Csx Transportation, Inc. -Counter- American Home Assurance Company, F.U.B.O. Stewart and Stevenson Services, Inc. v. Rountree Transport and Rigging, Inc. Kissimmee Utility Authority -Counter- -Counter- Woko Transportation, Black and Veatch -Counter- -Counter- Florida Municipal Power Agency -Counter- -Counter- General Electric Company, Inc., Consolidated Stewart and Stevenson Services, Inc. . American Home Assurance Company, F.U.B.O
    286 F.3d 1233 Third CircuitMarch 26, 2002

    R138-45. 13 AHA does not dispute that, as subrogee of S&S, it steps in the shoes of S&S, the subrogor See Underwriters at Lloyds v.

  25. LINCOLN NAT. HEALTH v. Mitsubishi
    666 So. 2d 159 District Court of Appeal of FloridaSeptember 22, 1995

    See generally Underwriters At Lloyds v. City of Lauderdale Lakes, 382 So.2d 702, 704 (Fla. 1980); Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. Campbell, 104 Fla. 274 , 139 So. 886 (Fla. 1932).

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list