TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Citing references

Opinions citing Lambert v. Riverboat Gaming Enforc. DIV., 706 So. 2d 172 (La. Ct. App. 1997)

33 citing cases

  1. 916 So. 2d 238 Louisiana Court of AppealJune 10, 2005

    Lambert v. Riverboat Gaming Enforcement Division, 96-1856, p. 4 (La.App. 1st Cir.12/29/97), 706 So.2d 172, 175 , writ denied, 98-0297 (La.3/20/98), 715 So.2d 1221 .

  2. Louisiana Court of AppealDecember 19, 2025

    I Cir. 8/ 6/ 25), 419 So. 3d 382 , 387 ( citing Lambert v. Riverboat Gaming Enforcement Div., 96- 1856 ( La. App. I Cir. 12/ 29/ 97), 706 So. 2d 172, 175 , writ denied, 98- 0297 ( La. 3/ 20/ 98), 715 So. 2d 1221 ).

  3. M.D. LouisianaMarch 30, 2026

    Jan. 17, 2020); Bouchereau, 2015 WL 5321285 , at *15 (quoting Lambert v. Riverboat Gaming Enf’t Div., 96-1856 (La. App. 1 Cir. 12/29/97), 706 So. 2d 172 , 177–78).

  4. 808 So. 2d 597 Louisiana Court of AppealMay 11, 2001

    Doe, 618 So.2d 848, 852-853 (La.1993); Lambert v. Riverboat Gaming Enforcement Div., 96-1856, pp. 8-9 *607 (La.App. 1st Cir.12/29/97), 706 So.2d 172, 177-178 , writ denied, 98-0297 (La.3/20/98), 715 So.2d 1221 .

  5. 148 So. 3d 964 Louisiana Court of AppealOctober 1, 2014

    Lambert v. Riverboat Gaming Enforcement Div., 96-1856, p. 5 (La.App. 1 Cir. 12/29/97), 706 So.2d 172, 175 .

  6. 823 So. 2d 351 Louisiana Court of AppealApril 11, 2002

    Lambert v. Riverboat Gaming Enforcement Division, 96-1856 (La. App. 1st Cir.12/29/97), 706 So.2d 172, 175 , writ denied, 98-0297 (La.3/20/98), 715 So.2d 1221 . The petition must set forth material facts upon which the cause of action is based.

  7. 978 So. 2d 1261 Louisiana Court of AppealMarch 26, 2008

    Lambert v. Riverboat Gaming Enforcement Division, 96-1856, p. 5 (La. App. 1 Cir. 12/29/97), 706 So.2d 172, 175-76 , writ denied, 98-0297 (La. 3/20/98), 715 So.2d 1221 , (citing Moresi v.

  8. 93 So. 3d 765 Louisiana Court of AppealJune 8, 2012

    Lambert v. Riverboat Gaming Enforcement Division, 96-1856, p. 4 (La.App.1 Cir. 12/29/97), 706 So.2d 172, 175 . We must therefore first examine La. Demo’s petition for nullity to determine whether the allegations are well-pleaded. La.

  9. Louisiana Court of AppealOctober 1, 2014

    Lambert v. Riverboat Gaming Enforcement Div., 96-1856, p. 5 (La.App. 1 Cir. 12/29/97), 706 So.2d 172, 175 .

  10. 985 So. 2d 171 Louisiana Court of AppealMarch 26, 2008

    Doe, 618 So.2d 848, 852-53 (La.1993); Lambert v. Riverboat Gaming Enforcement Div., 96-1856 (La.App. 1st Cir.12/29/97), 706 So.2d 172, 177-78 , writ denied, 98-0297 (La.3/20/98), 715 So.2d 1221 .

  11. 725 So. 2d 523 Louisiana Court of AppealDecember 10, 1998

    See Lambert v. Riverboat Gaming Enforcement Division, 96-1856, (La.App. 1 Cir. 12/29/97), 706 So.2d 172, 174 , writ denied, 98-0297 (La.3/20/98), 715 So.2d 1221 ; State, through the Louisiana Riverboat Gaming Commission v.

  12. 849 So. 2d 616 Louisiana Court of AppealMay 9, 2003

    Lambert v. Riverboat Gaming Enforcement Division, 96-1856, p. 4 (La.App. 1st Cir.12/29/97), 706 So.2d 172, 175 , writ denied, 98-0297 (La.3/20/98), 715 So.2d 1221 .

  13. 975 So. 2d 698 Louisiana Court of AppealJanuary 30, 2008

    Lambert v. Riverboat Gaming Enforcement Div., 96-1856 (La. App. 1 Cir. 12/29/97), 706 So.2d 172, 178 . Once a defendant establishes its conduct involves a matter of choice or discretion that is not the end of the inquiry.

  14. 108 So. 3d 1208 Louisiana Court of AppealJanuary 30, 2013

    Lambert v. Riverboat Gaming Enforcement Div., 96-1856 (La.App. 1 Cir. 12/29/97) , 706 So.2d 172, 178 . Once a defendant establishes its conduct involves a matter of choice or discretion that is not the end of the inquiry.

  15. 182 So. 3d 1009 Louisiana Court of AppealSeptember 23, 2015

    Lambert v. Riverboat Gaming Enforcement Div., 96-1856 (La.App. 1 Cir. 12/29/97) , 706 So.2d 172, 175 , writ denied, 98-0297 (La.3/20/98), 715 So.2d 1221 . Ciber was made a defendant in Cam-Soft’s first supplemental- petition.

  16. 835 So. 2d 576 Louisiana Court of AppealSeptember 27, 2002

    Lambert v. Riverboat Gaming Enforcement Division, 96-1856 (La.App. 1st Cir.12/29/97), 706 So.2d 172, 175 , writ denied, 98-0297 (La.3/20/98), 715 So.2d 1221 .

  17. 91 So. 3d 446 Louisiana Court of AppealMarch 27, 2012

    .; See also Lambert v. Riverboat Gaming Enforcement Div., 96-1856, p. 4 (La.App. 1 Cir. 12/29/97), 706 So.2d 172,175 . Louisiana Unfair Trade Practices Act The LUTPA, embodied in La.

  18. 69 So. 3d 475 Louisiana Court of AppealApril 26, 2011

    Lambert v. Riverboat Gaming Enforcement Div., 96-1856, p. 4 (La.App. 1 Cir.. 12/29/97), 706 So.2d 172,175 . IsTurning to the petition in this case, we conclude that the allegations sufficiently state a cause of action for breach of contract.

  19. 938 So. 2d 1047 Louisiana Court of AppealJune 21, 2006

    Lambert v. Riverboat Gaming Enforcement Division, 96-1856, p. 4 (La.App. 1 Cir. 12/29/97), 706 So.2d 172, 175 , writ denied, 98-0297 (La.3/20/98), 715 So.2d 1221 .

  20. Bilbe v. Foster
    176 So. 3d 542 Louisiana Court of AppealSeptember 9, 2015

    Lambert v. Riverboat Gaming Enforcement Division, 96-1856, p. 5 (La.App. 1 Cir. 12/29/97), 706 So.2d 172, 176 (citing Moresi v. State Through Department of Wildlife and Fisheries, 567 So.2d 1081, 1084 (La.1990)).

  21. 10 So. 3d 896 Louisiana Court of AppealJune 10, 2009

    Riverboat Gaming Enforcement Division, 96-1856, pp. 5-6 (La.App. 1 Cir. 12/29/97), 706 So.2d 172, 175-76 , writ denied, 98-297 (La. 3/20/98), 715 So.2d 1221 , saying: Title 42, § 1983 of the United States Code provides, in pertinent part, as follows: Every person

  22. Louisiana Court of AppealMay 18, 2022

    P. art. 891( A); Lambert v. Riverboat Gaming Enforcement Div., 96- 1856, p. 4 ( La.App. 1 Cir. 12/ 29/ 97), 706 So. 2d 172, 175 . The correctness of conclusions of law is not conceded for the purposes of a ruling on an exception of no cause of action.

  23. 255 So. 3d 627 Louisiana Court of AppealAugust 29, 2018

    See Lambert v. Riverboat Gaming Enforcement Division , 1998-1856, p. 6 (La. App. 1 Cir. 12/29/97), 706 So.2d 172 , 176. This assignment of error is unpersuasive. CONCLUSION The Exception was ripe for review when it was re-urged by the Board.

  24. Louisiana Court of AppealApril 20, 2023

    P. art. 891( A); Lambert v. Riverboat Gamin _ Enforcement Div., 1996- 1856 ( La. App. 1 St Cir. 12129197), 706 So. 2d 172, 175 , writ denied, 1998- 0297 ( La. 3120198), 715 So. 2d 1221 .

  25. E.D. LouisianaJanuary 30, 2020

    App. 1st Cir. 2005) (citing Lambert v. Riverboat Gaming Enf. Div., 706 So. 2d 172, 175 (La. App. 1st Cir. 1997); Kyle v. Civ. Serv. Comm'n, 588 So. 2d 1154, 1158-60 (La. App. 1st Cir. 1991); Corley v. Village of Florien, 889 So. 2d 364 (La.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list