TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Citing references

Opinions citing Ex Parte Cochran, 500 So. 2d 1179 (Ala. 1985)

157 citing cases

Negative treatment
Depth Newest Oldest Most cited
Majority opinions only
1 2–3 4–9 10+ times cited
  1. Lewis v. State
    24 So. 3d 480 Court of Criminal Appeals of AlabamaNovember 2, 2007

    State, 500 So.2d 1161, 1177 (Ala.Cr.App.1984), affirmed in pertinent part, reversed in part on other grounds, Ex parte Cochran, 500 So.2d 1179 (Ala.1985).

  2. Henderson v. State
    584 So. 2d 841 Court of Criminal Appeals of AlabamaAugust 3, 1990

    See Ex parte Cochran, 500 So.2d 1179 (Ala.1985). XII The appellant argues that the trial court erred in allowing the entire contents of the appellant's presentence investigative report into evidence.

  3. Cochran v. State
    500 So. 2d 1188 Court of Criminal Appeals of AlabamaMay 27, 1986

    On remand to the circuit court, the appellant argued that in Ex parte Cochran, 500 So.2d 1179 (Ala.1985), the Alabama Supreme Court ordered that an entirely new sentencing hearing be held.

  4. Anderson v. State
    542 So. 2d 292 Court of Criminal Appeals of AlabamaApril 14, 1987

    However, in Ex parte Cochran , 500 So.2d 1179 (Ala. 1985) an appellant claimed that the trial court committed error by failing to furnish him with transcripts of his first trial and other proceedings so that he could effectively cross-examine and impeach the State's

  5. Scott v. State
    163 So. 3d 389 Court of Criminal Appeals of AlabamaOctober 5, 2012

    Ex parte Cochran, 500 So.2d 1179, 1183 (Ala.1985). “ ‘[T]he mere fact that a prospective juror is personally acquainted with the victim [or his family] does not automatically disqualify a person from sitting on a criminal jury.’ ” Morrison v.

  6. State v. Moore
    969 So. 2d 169 Court of Criminal Appeals of AlabamaJuly 21, 2006

    Kennedy , a holding adopted by the Alabama Supreme Court in Ex parte Cochran, 500 So.2d 1179 (Ala.1985), the determination of whether a retrial is barred based on prosecutorial misconduct in a first trial comes down to one question — was the prosecutor's conduct

  7. Hooks v. State
    534 So. 2d 329 Court of Criminal Appeals of AlabamaJuly 28, 1987

    parte Cochran 500 So.2d 1179 (Ala.1985), aff'd, on return to remand, 500 So.2d 1188 (Ala.Crim.App.) aff'd, 500 So.2d 1064 (Ala. 1986).

  8. Knotts v. State
    686 So. 2d 431 Court of Criminal Appeals of AlabamaJune 16, 1995

    Ex parte Cochran, 500 So.2d 1179, 1183 (Ala.1985); Alabama Power Co. v. Henderson , 342 So.2d [323] at 327 [(Ala. 1976)].

  9. Fortenberry v. State
    545 So. 2d 129 Court of Criminal Appeals of AlabamaMarch 22, 1988

    State , 500 So.2d 1161 , 1177-78 (Ala.Cr.App. 1984), affirmed in part, reversed in part, Ex parte Cochran , 500 So.2d 1179 (Ala. 1985), cert. denied, Cochran v. Alabama , 481 U.S. 1033 , 107 S.Ct. 1965 , 95 L.Ed.2d 537 (1987).

  10. Ex Parte Ferguson
    814 So. 2d 970 Supreme Court of AlabamaJuly 6, 2001

    .)); and Ex parte Cochran, 500 So.2d 1179, 1186 (Ala.1985)("The language in Lockett and Eddings indicates that so long as the sentencer is not precluded from considering any mitigating factor, the requirements of the Constitution have been *977 satisfied.").

  11. Clark v. State
    896 So. 2d 584 Court of Criminal Appeals of AlabamaJune 27, 2003

    State, 585 So.2d 248, 248-49 (Ala.Crim.App.1991), aff'd, 628 So.2d 1004 (Ala.1993), cert. denied, 511 U.S. 1012 , 114 S.Ct. 1387 , 128 L.Ed.2d 61 (1994), quoting Ex parte Cochran, 500 So.2d 1179, 1187 (Ala.1985).

  12. Peraita v. State
    897 So. 2d 1161 Court of Criminal Appeals of AlabamaMay 30, 2003

    State, 500 So.2d 1161, 1177 (Ala.Cr.App.1984), affirmed in pertinent part, reversed in part on other grounds, Ex parte Cochran, 500 So.2d 1179 (Ala.1985)." White v. State, 546 So.2d 1014, 1017 (Ala.Crim.App.1989).

  13. Pierce v. State
    576 So. 2d 236 Court of Criminal Appeals of AlabamaAugust 3, 1990

    State, 500 So.2d 1161, 1177-78 (Ala.Cr.App.1984), affirmed in part, reversed on other grounds, 500 So.2d 1179 (Ala.1985).

  14. Morrison v. State
    601 So. 2d 165 Court of Criminal Appeals of AlabamaMarch 27, 1992

    Ex parte Cochran , 500 So.2d 1179 , 1183 (Ala. 1985); Alabama Power Co. v. Henderson , 342 So.2d at 327 .

  15. Jones v. State
    946 So. 2d 903 Court of Criminal Appeals of AlabamaFebruary 3, 2006

    State , 500 So.2d 1161 , 1177 (Ala.Cr.App. 1984), affirmed in pertinent part, reversed in part on other grounds, Ex parte Cochran , 500 So.2d 1179 (Ala. 1985)." White v. State , 546 So.2d 1014 , 1017 (Ala.Crim.App. 1989).

  16. Murry v. State
    562 So. 2d 1348 Court of Criminal Appeals of AlabamaApril 20, 1990

    See Ex parte Cochran, 500 So.2d 1179, 1187 (Ala. 1985); Hooks v. State, 534 So.2d 329 (Ala. Cr.App.1987); Duren v. State, 507 So.2d 111, 120 (Ala.Cr.App.1986), aff'd, 507 So.2d 121 (Ala.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 905 , 108 S.Ct. 249 , 98 L.Ed.2d 206 (1987).

  17. Yancey v. State
    65 So. 3d 452 Court of Criminal Appeals of AlabamaOctober 9, 2009

    Ex parte Cochran, 500 So.2d 1179 (Ala.1985).’ ” Holliday v. State, 751 So.2d 533, 535 (Ala.Crim.App.1999). Also “ ‘[t]he trial judge is in the best position to hear a prospective juror and to observe his or her demeanor.’ ” McNair v.

  18. Killingsworth v. State
    82 So. 3d 716 Court of Criminal Appeals of AlabamaNovember 13, 2009

    State, 500 So.2d 1161, 1177 (Ala.Cr.App.1984), affirmed in pertinent part, reversed in part on other grounds, Ex parte Cochran, 500 So.2d 1179 (Ala.1985).” White v. State, 546 So.2d 1014, 1017 (Ala.Crim.App.1989).

  19. Eaton v. State
    759 So. 2d 562 Court of Criminal Appeals of AlabamaApril 30, 1999

    Ex parte Cochran, 500 So.2d 1179, 1183 (Ala.1985); Alabama Power Co. v. Henderson, 342 So.2d [323] at 327 [Ala. 1976].

  20. Marquise Deshawn Flynn v. State of Alabama. (Appeal from Montgomery Circuit Court: CC-18-1178).
    Court of Criminal Appeals of AlabamaFebruary 9, 2024

    App. 2018). 4One commentator has concluded that a majority of state courts "have adopted the Kennedy standard under their state constitutions" and, citing Ex parte Cochran, 500 So. 2d 1179 (Ala. 1985), contends that Alabama is among those states.

  21. Kuenzel v. State
    577 So. 2d 474 Court of Criminal Appeals of AlabamaJune 29, 1990

    State, 500 So.2d 1161, 1178 (Ala.Cr.App.1984), affirmed in part, reversed in part on other grounds, 500 So.2d 1179 (Ala.1985), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1033 , 107 S.Ct. 1965 , 95 L.Ed.2d 537 (1987).

  22. Bankhead v. State
    585 So. 2d 97 Court of Criminal Appeals of AlabamaFebruary 2, 1990

    State , 500 So.2d 1161 , 1176-77 (Ala.Cr.App. 1984), aff'd in part, remanded on other grounds , 500 So.2d 1179 (Ala. 1985), aff'd on return to remand , 500 So.2d 1188 (Ala.Cr.App.), aff'd , 500 So.2d 1064 (Ala. 1986), cert. denied , 481 U.S. 1033 , 107 S.Ct. 1965

  23. Haney v. State
    603 So. 2d 368 Court of Criminal Appeals of AlabamaJune 28, 1991

    State, 500 So.2d 1161 (Ala.Cr.App.1984), aff'd in pertinent part, remanded on other part, 500 So.2d 1179 (Ala. 1985), aff'd on return to remand, 500 So.2d 1188 (Ala.Cr.App.), aff'd, 500 So.2d 1064 (Ala. 1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1033 , 107 S.Ct. 1965 , 95 L.Ed

  24. State v. Hutchison
    898 S.W.2d 161 Tennessee Supreme CourtJune 6, 1994

    State, 500 So.2d 1179, 1186 (Ala. 1985), on remand on other grounds, 500 So.2d 1188 (1986), aff'd 500 So.2d 1064 , cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1033 , 107 S.Ct. 1965 , 95 L.Ed.2d 537 (1986). [13] Bowers v.

  25. White v. State
    546 So. 2d 1014 Court of Criminal Appeals of AlabamaMarch 31, 1989

    State , 500 So.2d 1161 , 1177 (Ala.Cr.App. 1984), affirmed in pertinent part, reversed in part on other grounds, Ex parte Cochran , 500 So.2d 1179 (Ala. 1985).

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list