TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Citing references

Opinions citing State v. Johnson, 665 So. 2d 1237 (La. Ct. App. 1995)

34 citing cases

Negative treatment
Depth Newest Oldest Most cited
Majority opinions only
1 2–3 4–9 10+ times cited
  1. State v. Williamson
    671 So. 2d 1208 Louisiana Court of AppealApril 3, 1996

    Maxie, supra ; State v. Johnson, 27,522 (La.App. 2d Cir. 12/6/95) 665 So.2d 1237 ; State v. Owens, supra .

  2. State v. Shumaker
    945 So. 2d 277 Louisiana Court of AppealDecember 13, 2006

    State v. Johnson, 27,522 (La.App.2d Cir.12/06/95), 665 So.2d 1237, 1246 , citing State v. Rodrigue, 437 So.2d 830 (La.1983). Further, the affidavit need not eliminate all possible innocent explanations of the described behavior. State v.

  3. State v. Fuller
    759 So. 2d 104 Louisiana Court of AppealDecember 17, 1999

    Sylvester, 343 So.2d 1020 (La.1977); State v. Johnson, 27,522 (La.App. 2d Cir. 12/06/95), 665 So.2d 1237 .

  4. State v. Henderson
    684 So. 2d 1054 Louisiana Court of AppealDecember 11, 1996

    Maxie, 93-2158 (La.4/10/95), 653 So.2d 526 ; State v. Johnson, 27,522 (La.App.2d Cir. 12/6/95) 665 So.2d 1237 ; State v. Owens, 606 So.2d 876 (La.App. 2d Cir.1992).

  5. State v. Murray
    827 So. 2d 488 Louisiana Court of AppealAugust 29, 2002

    State v. Johnson, 27,522 (La.App.2d Cir.12/06/95), 665 So.2d 1237 ; State v. Wallace, 612 So.2d 183 (La.App. 1st Cir.1992), writ denied, 614 So.2d 1253 (La.1993). This court in State v.

  6. State v. Brown
    750 So. 2d 262 Louisiana Court of AppealDecember 15, 1999

    State v. Johnson , 27,522 (La.App. 2nd Cir. 12/6/95), 665 So.2d 1237, 1249 ; Nicholas, 652 So.2d at 668 . See also State v. Boudreaux, 304 So.2d 343, 346, n. 5 (La.1974).

  7. State v. Nelson
    817 So. 2d 158 Louisiana Court of AppealMarch 28, 2002

    See State v. Johnson, 27,522 (La.App. 2 Cir. 12/6/95) 665 So.2d 1237 where just a delay in executing a "noknock" entry resulted in the death of one police officer and the injury of another.

  8. State of Louisiana v. Roosevelt Randolph
    Louisiana Court of AppealNovember 20, 2023

    (citing State v. Johnson, 27,522, p. 16 (La. App. 2nd Cir.12/6/95), 665 So.2d 1237, 1248 ). The Fifth Circuit concluded that the affidavit provided probable cause under the totality of the circumstances for the issuance of the search warrant. Id.

  9. State v. Mitchell
    889 So. 2d 1257 Louisiana Court of AppealDecember 15, 2004

    Murray, supra ; State v. Johnson, 27,522 (La.App.2d Cir.12/06/95), 665 So.2d 1237 . The determination of whether the requisite intent is present is a question for the trier of fact. State v. Huizar, 414 So.2d 741 (La.1982).

  10. State v. Kuta
    686 N.W.2d 374 Nebraska Court of AppealsSeptember 14, 2004

    Similarly, in State v. Johnson, 665 So. 2d 1237 (La.

  11. State v. Gay
    697 So. 2d 642 Louisiana Court of AppealJune 18, 1997

    State v. Johnson, 27,522 (La.App.2d Cir. 12/6/95), 665 So.2d 1237 . This court's authority to review questions of fact in a criminal case is limited to the sufficiency-of-the-evidence evaluation under Jackson v.

  12. State v. Lloyd
    161 So. 3d 879 Louisiana Court of AppealJanuary 14, 2015

    State v. Johnson,. 27,522 (La.App.2d Cir.12/6/95), 665 So.2d 1237 ; State v. Brooks, 49,024 (La.App.2d Cir.5/14/14), 139 So.3d 1072 . The determination of whether the requisite intent is present is a question for the trier of fact. State v.

  13. State v. Trotter
    852 So. 2d 1247 Louisiana Court of AppealAugust 22, 2003

    In State v.

  14. State v. Rhodes
    688 So. 2d 628 Louisiana Court of AppealJanuary 22, 1997

    Mosby, 595 So.2d 1135 (La.1992); State v. Johnson, 27,522 (La.App.2d Cir. 12/6/95), 665 So.2d 1237 . Deputy Sullivant's testimony regarding the mood of the crowd had a rational connection to facts at issue in the case.

  15. State v. Cheatham
    877 So. 2d 164 Louisiana Court of AppealJune 23, 2004

    Murray, 36,137 (La.App.2d Cir.8/29/02), 827 So.2d 488 , writ denied, 02-2634 (La.9/5/03), 852 So.2d 1020 ; State v. Johnson, 27,522 (La.App.2d Cir.12/6/95), 665 So.2d 1237 . The jury could have easily inferred that Defendant, in shooting Mr.

  16. Barrett v. TL James & Co.
    671 So. 2d 1186 Louisiana Court of AppealApril 3, 1996

    State v. Johnson, 27,522 (La.App. 2d Cir. 12/6/95), 665 So.2d 1237 ; Briscoe v. Briscoe, 25,955 (La.App. 2d Cir. 8/17/94), 641 So.2d 999 ; Laing v.

  17. State v. Thompson
    894 So. 2d 1268 Louisiana Court of AppealMarch 2, 2005

    Murray, 36,137 (La.App.2d Cir.8/29/02), 827 So.2d 488 , writ denied, 02-2634 (La.9/5/03), 852 So.2d 1020 ; State v. Johnson, 27,522 (La.App.2d Cir.12/6/95), 665 So.2d 1237 .

  18. State v. Lensey
    182 So. 3d 1059 Louisiana Court of AppealNovember 18, 2015

    State v. Johnson, 27,-522 (La.App.2d Cir.12/6/95), 665 So.2d 1237 ; State v. Lloyd, supra. The determination of whether the requisite intent is present is a question for the trier of fact. State v. Huizar, 414 So.2d 741 (La.1982); State v. Lloyd, supra.

  19. State v. Turner
    859 So. 2d 911 Louisiana Court of AppealOctober 29, 2003

    Murray, 36,137 (La.App.2d Cir.8/29/02), 827 So.2d 488 ; State v. Johnson, 27,522 (La.App.2d Cir.12/06/95), 665 So.2d 1237 .

  20. State v. Brown
    966 So. 2d 1138 Louisiana Court of AppealOctober 3, 2007

    Maxie, 93-2158 (La.4/10/95), 653 So.2d 526 ; State v. Johnson, 27,522 (La. App. 2d Cir.12/6/95), 665 So.2d 1237 .

  21. State v. Robinson
    63 So. 3d 1113 Louisiana Court of AppealApril 20, 2011

    See also State v. Johnson, 27,522 (La.App.2d Cir.12/6/95), 665 So.2d 1237 . In Richards v.

  22. State v. Smith
    740 So. 2d 675 Louisiana Court of AppealMay 5, 1999

    Maxie, 93-2158 (La.4/10/95), 653 So.2d 526 ; State v. Johnson, 27,522 (La.App.2d Cir.12/6/95), 665 So.2d 1237 .

  23. State v. Davis
    914 So. 2d 1129 Louisiana Court of AppealOctober 26, 2005

    Murray, supra ; State v. Johnson, 27,522 (La.App. 2d Cir.12/06/95), 665 So.2d 1237 . The determination of whether the requisite intent is present is a question for the trier of fact. State v. Huizar, 414 So.2d 741 (La.1982).

  24. State v. Taylor
    968 So. 2d 1135 Louisiana Court of AppealOctober 24, 2007

    Murray, supra ; State v. Johnson, 27,522 (La.App. 2d Cir.12/06/95), 665 So.2d 1237 . The determination of whether the requisite intent is present is a question for the trier of fact. State v. Huizar, 414 So.2d 741 (La.1982).

  25. State v. Brooks
    139 So. 3d 1072 Louisiana Court of AppealMay 14, 2014

    Murray, supra; State v. Johnson, 27,522 (La.App.2d Cir.12/6/95), 665 So.2d 1237 . The determination of whether the requisite intent is present is a question for the trier of fact. State v. Huizar, 414 So.2d 741 (La.1982); State v. Davis, supra.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list