TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Citing references

Opinions citing State v. Williams, 735 So. 2d 62 (La. Ct. App. 1999)

89 citing cases

Negative treatment
Depth Newest Oldest Most cited
Majority opinions only
1 2–3 4–9 10+ times cited
  1. State v. Collins
    30 So. 3d 72 Louisiana Court of AppealDecember 8, 2009

    Sandifer, 95-2226, p. 10 (La.9/5/96), 679 So.2d 1324, 1331 ; State v. Williams, 98-1006, p. 6 (La.App. 5 Cir. 3/30/99), 735 So.2d 62, 69 , writ denied, 99-1077 (La.9/24/99), 747 So.2d 1118 .

  2. State v. Blanchard
    776 So. 2d 1165 Supreme Court of LouisianaJanuary 18, 2001

    Hamlin, 497 So.2d 1369 (La.1986); State v. Williams, 98-1006 (La.App. 5 Cir. 3/30/99) , 735 So.2d 62 .

  3. State v. Hines
    829 So. 2d 530 Louisiana Court of AppealSeptember 30, 2002

    Sandifer, 95-2226 (La.9/5/96), 679 So.2d 1324, 1331 ; State v. Williams, 98-1006 (La.App. 5 Cir. 3/30/99) , 735 So.2d 62, 69 , writ denied, 99-1077 (La.9/24/99), 747 So.2d 1118 .

  4. State v. Manson
    791 So. 2d 749 Louisiana Court of AppealJune 27, 2001

    Belton, 441 So.2d 1195 (La.1983), cert. denied, 466 U.S. 953 , 104 S.Ct. 2158 , 80 L.Ed.2d 543 (1984); State v. Williams, 98-1006 (La.App. 5 Cir. 3/30/99) , 735 So.2d 62 , writ denied, 99-1077 (La.9/24/99), 747 So.2d 1118 .

  5. State v. Villarreal
    759 So. 2d 126 Louisiana Court of AppealFebruary 16, 2000

    State v. Williams, 98-1006, p. 6 (La.App. 5th Cir. 3/30/99), 735 So.2d 62, 69 . According to the testimony presented by the state, defendant did not have the weapon in question on his person at the time of arrest.

  6. State v. Cowart
    815 So. 2d 275 Louisiana Court of AppealMarch 26, 2002

    C.E. art. 802; State v. Williams, 98-1006 (La. App. 5 Cir.3/30/99), 735 So.2d 62, 75 . A witness is generally competent to testify that a statement was made to him so long as no attempt is made to vouch for the credibility of its contents. State v.

  7. State v. Dyer
    794 So. 2d 1 Louisiana Court of AppealApril 24, 2001

    C.E. art. 802; State v. Williams, 98-1006 (La.App. 5 Cir.3/30/99), 735 So.2d 62, 75 . A witness is generally competent to testify that a statement was made to him so long as no attempt is made to vouch for the credibility of its contents. State v.

  8. State v. Segura
    829 So. 2d 587 Louisiana Court of AppealSeptember 30, 2002

    State v. Williams, 98-1006 (La.App. 5 Cir. 3/30/99) , 735 So.2d 62, 69 , writ denied, 99-1077 (La.9/24/99), 747 So.2d 1118 .

  9. State v. Cooley
    857 So. 2d 1209 Louisiana Court of AppealSeptember 30, 2003

    [14] State v. Williams, 98-1006 (La.App. 5 Cir. 3/30/99) , 735 So.2d 62, 72 , writ denied, 99-1077 (La.9/24/99), 747 So.2d 1118 (citations omitted).

  10. State v. Blanchard
    749 So. 2d 19 Louisiana Court of AppealNovember 10, 1999

    Hamlin, 497 So.2d 1369 (La.1986); State v. Williams, 98-1006 (La. App. 5 Cir. 3/30/99), 735 So.2d 62 .

  11. State v. Richardson
    142 So. 3d 314 Louisiana Court of AppealMay 28, 2014

    Sandifer, 95-2226 (La.9/5/96), 679 So.2d 1324, 1331 ; State v. Williams, 98-1006, (La.App. 5 Cir. 3/30/99), 735 So.2d 62, 69 , writ denied, 99-1077 (La.9/24/99), 747 So.2d 1118 .

  12. State v. Broussard
    769 So. 2d 1257 Louisiana Court of AppealOctober 4, 2000 Dissent

    In State v.

  13. State v. Quest
    772 So. 2d 772 Louisiana Court of AppealOctober 18, 2000

    Sandifer, 95-2226 (La.9/5/96), 679 So.2d 1324, 1331 ; State v. Williams, 98-1006 (La.App. 5th Cir. 3/30/99), 735 So.2d 62, 69 , writ denied, 99-1077 (La.9/24/99), 747 So.2d 1118 .

  14. State v. Nelson
    822 So. 2d 796 Louisiana Court of AppealJune 26, 2002

    State v. Williams, 98-1006 (La. App. 5 Cir. 3/30/99), 735 So.2d 62, 73 , writ denied, 99-1077 (La.9/24/99), 747 So.2d 1118 .

  15. State v. Flagg
    760 So. 2d 522 Louisiana Court of AppealApril 25, 2000

    Belton, supra ; State v. Williams, 98-1006 (La.App. 5 Cir. 3/30/99) , 735 So.2d 62, 70 , writ denied, 99-1077 (La.9/24/99), 747 So.2d 1118 .

  16. State v. Flagg
    792 So. 2d 133 Louisiana Court of AppealJuly 30, 2001

    State v. Williams, 98-1006 (La.App. 5 Cir. 3/30/99) , 735 So.2d 62 , writ denied, 99-1077 (La.9/24/99), 747 So.2d 1118 .

  17. State v. Enclade
    858 So. 2d 8 Louisiana Court of AppealSeptember 16, 2003

    State v. Williams, 98-1006, p. 19 (La.App. 5 Cir. 3/30/99), 735 So.2d 62, 72 , writ denied, 99-1077 (La.9/24/99) 747 So.2d 1118 . Voluntariness of consent is a question of fact which the trial judge is to determine based on the totality of the circumstances.

  18. State v. Lefeure
    778 So. 2d 744 Louisiana Court of AppealJanuary 30, 2001

    State v. Williams, 735 So.2d 62 at 72 .

  19. State v. Williams
    802 So. 2d 909 Louisiana Court of AppealNovember 27, 2001

    State v. Williams, 98-1006 (La.App. 5th Cir.3/30/99), 735 So.2d 62, 69 , writ denied, 99-1077 (La.9/24/99), 747 So.2d 1118 , citing State v. Appacrombie, 616 So.2d 285, 288 (La.App. 2nd Cir.1993), writ denied, 623 So.2d 1302 (La.1993).

  20. State v. Schieffler
    812 So. 2d 7 Louisiana Court of AppealFebruary 13, 2001

    State v. Williams, 98-1006 (La.App. 5 Cir. 3/30/99) , 735 So.2d 62, 69 , writ denied, 99-1077 (La.9/24/99), 747 So.2d 1118 , citing State v. Appacrombie, 616 So.2d 285, 288 (La.App. 2 Cir. 1993), writ denied, 623 So.2d 1302 (La. 1993).

  21. State v. Jackson
    820 So. 2d 1147 Louisiana Court of AppealMay 29, 2002

    State v. Williams, 98-1006 (La.App. 5 Cir. 3/30/99) , 735 So.2d 62, 74 , writ denied, 99-1077 (La.9/24/99), 747 So.2d 1118 .

  22. State v. Murray
    827 So. 2d 488 Louisiana Court of AppealAugust 29, 2002

    Normandin, 32,927 (La.App.2d Cir.12/22/99), 750 So.2d 321, 324 , writ denied, XXXX-XXXX (La.9/29/00), 769 So.2d 550 ; State v. Williams, 98-1006 (La.App. 5th *501 Cir.3/30/99), 735 So.2d 62, 73 , writ denied, 99-1077 (La.9/24/99), 747 So.2d 1118 .

  23. State v. Esteen
    821 So. 2d 60 Louisiana Court of AppealMay 15, 2002

    State v. Williams, 98-1006 (La.App. 5th Cir.3/30/99), 735 So.2d 62, 73 , writ denied, 99-1077 (La.9/24/99), 747 So.2d 1118 . In this case, the trial judge found that the alternative methods were not practical and unlikely to succeed.

  24. State v. Burns
    877 So. 2d 1073 Louisiana Court of AppealJune 29, 2004

    [8] State v. Williams, 98-1006 (La.App. 5 Cir. 3/30/99) , 735 So.2d 62, 74 , writ denied, 99-1077 (La.9/24/99), 747 So.2d 1118 . [9] LSA-C.Cr.P. art. 215.1; Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 , 88 S.Ct. 1868 , 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968); State v.

  25. State v. Lathers
    868 So. 2d 881 Louisiana Court of AppealFebruary 23, 2004

    State v. Williams, 98-1006 (La.App. 5 Cir. 3/30/99) , 735 So.2d 62, 69 , writ denied, 99-1077 (La.9/24/99), 747 So.2d 1118 , citing State v. Appacrombie, 616 So.2d 285, 288 (La.App. 2 Cir. 1993), writ denied, 623 So.2d 1302 (La. 1993).

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list