TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Citing references

Opinions citing Letzter v. Cephas, 792 So. 2d 481 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

11 citing cases

  1. 103 So. 3d 871 District Court of Appeal of FloridaSeptember 27, 2012

    Letzter v. Cephas, 792 So.2d 481, 485 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001).

  2. 814 So. 2d 1145 District Court of Appeal of FloridaApril 10, 2002

    Letzter v. Cephas, 792 So.2d 481, 485 (Fla. 4th DCA)(citing Davidson v. Gaillard, 584 So.2d 71, 73-74 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991), disapproved on other grounds by Barth v. Khubani, 748 So.2d 260 (Fla.1999)), review granted, 796 So.2d 535 (Fla.2001).

  3. Grobman v. Posey
    863 So. 2d 1230 District Court of Appeal of FloridaDecember 31, 2003

    Letzter v. Cephas, 792 So.2d 481, 487 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001). Joint tortfeasors are "`[t]hose who act together in committing wrong, or whose acts if independent of each other, unite in causing a single injury.'"

  4. 33 So. 3d 117 District Court of Appeal of FloridaApril 28, 2010

    As we explained in Letzter v. Cephas, 792 So.2d 481, 485 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001): Under traditional negligence principles, a tortfeasor is responsible for all reasonably foreseeable consequences of his or her actions. See, e.g., Stark v.

  5. 225 So. 3d 780 Supreme Court of FloridaJuly 13, 2017

    Silverman, 814 So. 2d 1145, 1149 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002), review dismissed, 860 So. 2d 976 (2003); Letzter v. Cephas, 792 So. 2d 481, 488 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001). 7.

  6. Supreme Court of FloridaSeptember 7, 2017

    Silverman, 814 So. 2d 1145, 1149 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002), review dismissed, 860 So. 2d 976 (2003); Letzter v. Cephas, 792 So. 2d 481, 488 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001). 7.

  7. District Court of Appeal of FloridaJuly 15, 2019

    Letzter v. Cephas, 792 So. 2d 481, 485 (Fla. 4th DCA)(citing Davidson v. Gaillard, 584 So. 2d 71 , 73–74 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991), disapproved on other grounds by Barth v.

  8. 149 So. 3d 39 District Court of Appeal of FloridaJuly 2, 2014

    Silverman, 814 So. 2d 1145 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002); Letzter v. Cephas, 792 So. 2d 481 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001). The Florida Supreme Court has declined to answer the certified questions in both cases.” Nason, 33 So. 3d at 121 n.1. -8- 19.

  9. 876 So. 2d 8 District Court of Appeal of FloridaMay 7, 2004

    Silverman, 814 So.2d 1145, 1148 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002), review denied, 860 So.2d 976 (Fla.2003); Letzter v. Cephas, 792 So.2d 481, 486 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001). In the instant case, as we have noted, there is only one injury, that being the death of Ms.

  10. 843 So. 2d 871 Supreme Court of FloridaMarch 27, 2003

    We originally accepted jurisdiction to review Letzter v. Cephas, 792 So.2d 481 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001), pursuant to article V, section 3(b)(4), of the Florida Constitution.

  11. 805 So. 2d 106 District Court of Appeal of FloridaJanuary 23, 2002

    Letzter v. Cephas, 792 So.2d 481, 486 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001) (citing Sands v. Wilson, 140 Fla. 18 , 191 So. 21, 23 (1939)). In this case, the jury was not instructed that an issue for its determination was whether any of the defendants were joint tort-feasors.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list