TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Citing references

Opinions citing Leo v. Trevino, 285 S.W.3d 470 (Tex. App.—Edinburg-Corpus Christi 2006)

19 citing cases

  1. 491 S.W.3d 877 Court of Appeals of TexasApril 12, 2016

    Trevino, 285 S.W.3d 470, 480 (Tex.App.Corpus Christi 2006, no pet.), In Leo , the Corpus Christi Court of Appeals held that as a result of the shifting burdens of proof found in federal cases addressing qualified immunity, a state actor could use a no-evidence

  2. Tex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.June 9, 2016

    Leo v. Trevino, 285 S.W.3d 470, 478 (Tex. App—Corpus Christi 2006, no pet.). 12 879 S.W.2d 10, 25 (Tex. 1994).

  3. Fischer v. State
    237 S.W.3d 897 Tex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)October 24, 2007

    State, 285 S.W.3d 470 (Tex.App.-San Antonio 2007).

  4. Tex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.July 21, 2016

    City of Abilene, 814 F.3d 721, 728 (5th Cir. 2016); Leo v. Trevino, 285 S.W.3d 470, 480 (Tex. App—Corpus Christi 2006, no pet.).

  5. 354 S.W.3d 691 Tennessee Supreme CourtNovember 18, 2011

    Mitchell, 297 F.3d 497, 505 (6th Cir. 2002); Leo v. Trevino, 285 S.W.3d 470, 480 (Tex. Ct. App. 2006). An important component of that right is that the burden is always on the plaintiff “to demonstrate the inapplicability of the defense.” McClendon v.

  6. York v. State
    298 S.W.3d 735 Court of Appeals of TexasSeptember 24, 2009

    . § 1983 (West 2004); Leo v. Trevino, 285 S.W.3d 470, 479 (Tex. App.-Corpus Christi 2006, no pet.); see Leachman v. Dretke, 261 S.W.3d 297, 312 (Tex.App.-Fort Worth 2008, no pet.).

  7. Tex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)October 8, 2009

    . @   Leo v. Trevino , 285 S.W.3d 470, 479 (Tex. App. C Corpus Christi 2006, no pet.) (citing Doe v. Taylor Indep. Sch. Dist. , 15 F.3d 443, 450 (5th Cir.), cert. denied , 513 U.S. 815 (1994)); see also Albright v. Oliver , 510 U.S. 266, 271 , 114 S.

  8. Tex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)September 24, 2009

    '  1983 (West 2004); Leo v. Trevino , 285 S.W.3d 470, 479 (Tex. App . C Corpus Christi 2006, no pet.); see Leachman v. Dretke , 261 S.W.3d 297, 312 (Tex. App. C Fort Worth 2008, no pet.).  

  9. Tex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)August 7, 2008

    See Leo v. Trevino , No. 13-05-00516-CV, 2006 Tex. App. LEXIS 4918, *7, 10 (Tex. App.--Corpus Christi June 8, 2006, no pet.).

  10. Tex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)August 7, 2008

    See Leo v. Trevino, No. 13-05-00516-CV, 2006 Tex. App. LEXIS 4918, *7, 10 (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi June 8, 2006, no pet.).

  11. Tex. App. Ct., 9th Dist. (Beaumont)July 31, 2015

    Trevino, 285 S.W.3d 470, 478 (Tex. App.— Corpus Christi 2006, no pet.) (federal substantive law applied when the state court 24 reviews a claim brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 ).

  12. Tex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.January 25, 2018

    Leo v. Trevino, 285 S.W.3d 470, 479 (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi 2006, no pet.). Qualified immunity is an affirmative defense available to government officials sued in their individual capacities under section 1983. Bexar Cty. v.

  13. Tex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)April 11, 2019

    .”); Leo v. Trevino, 285 S.W.3d 470, 480 (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi 2006, no pet.)

  14. Tex. App. Ct., 9th Dist. (Beaumont)March 26, 2020

    Leo v. Trevino, 285 S.W.3d 470, 479 (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi 2006, no pet.) (citing Doe v. Taylor Indep. Sch. Dist., 15 F.3d 443, 450 (5th Cir. 1994)); see also Albright v.

  15. W.D. TexasAugust 7, 2024

    See Leo v. Trevino, 285 S.W.3d 470, 484 (Tx. App. 2006). Because the TDCJ’s inmate policy requires defendants’ obedience their actions were ministerial.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list