Citing references

Barrett v. Miller, 599 So.2d 559, 567 (Miss. 1992)(quoting McFadden v. State, 542 So.2d 871, 877 (Miss. 1989)). ¶ 32. In the second suit, Mosby sued the officers in their individual capacities.

[5] Barrett v. Miller, 599 So.2d 559 (Miss. 1992) (arising out of actions by law enforcement officers in the course of searching a home); Starnes v.

State, 666 So.2d 754, 757 (Miss.1995) ( citing Barrett v. Miller, 599 So.2d 559, 566 (Miss.1992)).

Barrett v. Miller, 599 So.2d 559, 566 (Miss.1992).

The complaint asserts that jurisdiction is based on Barrett v. Miller, 599 So.2d 559 (Miss. 1992) and Article 3, Section 24 of the Mississippi Constitution.

State, 666 So. 2d 754, 757 (Miss. 1995) (quoting Barrett v. Miller, 599 So. 2d 559, 566 (Miss. 1992)).

In Barrett v. Miller, 599 So.2d 559 , (Miss. 1992), we stated: A search warrant may only be issued when the police have demonstrated probable cause by introducing evidence of underlying facts and circumstances before the magistrate granting the warrant.

See also Barrett v. Miller, 599 So.2d 559, 567 (Miss.1992). The classic definition is found in Poyner v.

Barrett v. Miller, 599 So.2d 559, 564 (Miss.1992). This authority is present even though the statute is not specifically cited by name in the complaint. Hood v. Miss. Dep't of Wildlife Conservation, 571 So.2d 263, 267 (Miss.1990).

Barrett v. Miller, 599 So.2d 559, 566 (Miss. 1992), quoting Smith v. State, 504 So.2d 1194, 1196 (Miss. 1987). This Court has also authorized giving supplemental oral testimony to the magistrate.

See also Barrett v. Miller, 599 So.2d 559, 567 (Miss.1992). The classic definition is found in Poyner v.

Miller, 599 So.2d 559, 567 (Miss.1992) (stating that sheriff deputies were not exercising discretionary authority in searching a home where the deputies were acting under a search warrant which gave them the authority to search and set forth parameters in which

[9] Barrett v. Miller, 599 So.2d 559, 567 (Miss. 1992). [10] Shaw, 45 So.3d at 659 . [11] City of Jackson v. Powell, 917 So.2d 59, 73 (Miss.2005) (quoting Bridges v. Pearl River Valley Water Supply Dist., 793 So.2d 584, 588 (Miss.2001)).

Barrett v. Miller, 599 So. 2d 559, 567 (Miss.1992).

Barrett v. Miller, 599 So. 2d 559, 567 (Miss. 1992)(quoting McFadden v. State, 542 So. 2d 871, 877 (Miss. 1989)). ¶32. In the second suit, Mosby sued the officers in their individual capacities.

See also Barrett v. Miller, 599 So. 2d 559, 567 (Miss. 1992). The classic definition is found in Poyner v.

See also Barrett v. Miller, 599 So.2d 559, 567 (Miss.1992). The classic definition 18 is found in Poyner v.

Barrett v. Miller, 599 So.2d 559, 564 (Miss. 1992). This authority is present even though the statute is not specifically cited by name in the complaint. Hood v. Miss. Dep’t of Wildlife Conservation, 571 So.2d 263, 267 (Miss. 1990).

Barrett v. Miller, 599 So. 2d 559, 566 (Miss. 1992).

See Barrett v. Miller, 599 So.2d 559, 564 (Miss.1992). It is well established that Mississippi courts share concurrent subject matter jurisdiction with federal courts in the enforcement of federally created rights. Burrell v.

Id. at 557-558 ( quoting Barrett v. Miller, 599 So.2d 559, 567 (Miss.1992)).

Barrett v. Miller, 599 So.2d 559, 567 (Miss. 1992). In two recent cases, Lang v. Bay St. Louis/Waveland Sch. Dist., No. 97-CA-01612-SCT, 1999 WL 250977 , ___ So.2d ___ (Miss. April 29, 1999) and L.W. v. McComb Separate Mun. Sch.

Miller, 599 So.2d 559, 567 (Miss.1992)), the Court described the discretionary and ministerial distinction as follows: While there is no flexible rule to distinguish whether an act is ministerial or discretionary, the most important criteria is if the duty is

See Barrett v. Miller, 599 So.2d 559, 568 (Miss.1992) (the good faith execution of a search warrant is a ministerial act, and not entitled to the discretionary exception).

See also Barrett v. Miller, 599 So.2d 559, 567 (Miss. 1992); McFadden v. State, 542 So.2d 871, 877 (Miss. 1989); Region VII, Mental Health v. Isaac, 523 So.2d 1013, 1017 (Miss. 1988).