Citing references

Likewise, in Branch v. McGeeney, 123 Md.App. at 353 , 718 A.2d 631 , this Court said that “[t]he only police actions that violate substantive due process are those which ‘shock the conscience’ of the court.”

See Branch v. McGeeney , 123 Md. App. 330 , 348-49 , 718 A.2d 631 (1998) (arrest of minor); Williams v. Prince George's County , 112 Md. App. 526 , 547 , 685 A.2d 884 (1996) (warrantless arrest); Wilson v. State , 87 Md.

In this regard, we rely on the recent case of Branch v. McGeeney, 123 Md.App. 330 , 718 A.2d 631 (1998).

s arrest occurred in Maryland, and Maryland law governs her state-law claims, Branch v. McGeeney , 123 Md.App. 330 , 718 A.2d 631 (1998), is instructive.

Petetit, 113 Md.App. 401, 422-23 , 688 A.2d 54, 65 , cert. denied, 346 Md. 27 , 694 A.2d 950 (1997); Branch v. McGeeney, 123 Md.App. 330 , 718 A.2d 631 (1998).

Branch v. McGeeney, 123 Md.App. 330, 348 , 718 A.2d 631 (1998) (quoting Graham v. Connor, 490 U.S. 386, 397 , 109 S.Ct. 1865 , 104 L.Ed.2d 443 (1989)).

Petetit, 113 Md.App. 401, 422-23 , 688 A.2d 54, 65 , cert. denied, 346 Md. 27 , 694 A.2d 950 (1996 [1997]); Branch v. McGeeney, 123 Md.App. 330 , 718 A.2d 631 (1998).

McGeeney, 123 Md.App. 330 , 718 A.2d 631, 639 (1998), and the district court so charged the jury.

McGeeney, 123 Md.App. 330, 356 , 718 A.2d 631 (1998); Witt v. Ristaino, 118 Md.App. 155, 172 , 701 A.2d 1227 (1997). We conclude that the Board’s reliance on A.A.C.C. § 5-210(b) was misplaced.

McGeeney, 123 Md.App. 330 , 718 A.2d 631 (Md.Ct.Spec.App.1998) (no IIED where police officers forced nine-year-old child to her knees and cuffed her); Continental Cas. Co. v. Mirabile, 52 Md. App. 387 , 449 A.2d 1176 (Md.Ct.

Anderson, 126 Md.App. 667 , 730 A.2d 774, 788 (1999); Branch v. McGeeney, 123 Md.App. 330, 349 , 718 A.2d 631 (1998); Thomas v. Annapolis, 113 Md.App. 440, 454-57 , 688 A.2d 448 (1997); Williams v.

State, 358 Md. 278, 284 , 747 A.2d 1209 (2000); see In Re Anthony R., 362 Md. 51, 60 , 763 A.2d 136 (2000); see Branch v. McGeeney, 123 Md.App. 330, 356 , 718 A.2d 631 (1998); Witt v. Ristaino, 118 Md.App. 155, 172 , 701 A.2d 1227 (1997).

Branch v. McGeeney , 123 Md. App. 330 , 348, 718 A.2d 631 (1998). "The 'reasonableness' of a particular use of force must be judged from the perspective of a reasonable officer on the scene, rather than with the 20/20 vision of hindsight."

McGeeney, 123 Md.App. 330 , 718 A.2d 631, 640-41 (1998) (excessive force claims are treated similarly under both the federal Fourth Amendment and Articles 24 and 26 of the Maryland Declaration of Rights).

In Branch v.

Branch v. McGeeney, 718 A.2d 631, 642 (Md. Ct. Spec. App. 1998); see also Robles v. Prince George’s Cty., 302 F.3d 262 , 272 (4th Cir. 2002).

Branch v. McGeeney, 718 A.2d 631, 642 (Md. App. 1998) (citing Oursler v. Tawes, 13 A.2d 763, 768 (Md. 1940)); see also Sesay v. Woolsey, No. 8:18-cv-01924-PWG, 2019 WL 859782 , at *8 (D. Md. Feb. 21, 2019).

Branch v. McGeeney, 123 Md.App. 330, 348 (1998)(internal quotation marks omitted) (quoting Graham v. Connor, 490 U.S. 386, 397 (1989)).

See Branch v. McGeeney, 123 Md. App. 330, 351-52 (1998). Second, and more significantly, Bradley pleads no specific allegations regarding his emotional distress.