Citing references
Opinions citing Alexander v. Berman, 560 N.E.2d 1295 (Mass. App. Ct. 1990)
13 citing cases
-
D. MassachusettsNovember 10, 2020
Ct. 2002); see Alexander v. Berman, 560 N.E.2d 1295, 1298 (Mass. App.
-
672 N.E.2d 987 Massachusetts Appeals CourtNovember 19, 1996
Ct. 277, 281-282 (1994), or for the purchase and sale of a business, see Alexander v. Berman, 29 Mass. App. Ct. 458, 458-459, 461-462 (1990), and thus that the statute did not apply to the oral brokerage contract at issue.
-
8 Mass. L. Rptr. 715 Massachusetts Superior CourtAugust 4, 1998
Alexander v. Berman, 29 Mass.App.Ct. 458, 462 (1990).
-
21 Mass. L. Rptr. 488 Massachusetts Superior CourtSeptember 5, 2006
Alexander v. Berman, 29 Mass.App.Ct. 458, 462 (1990).
-
901 F. Supp. 404 D. MassachusettsAugust 15, 1995
Berman, 29 Mass.App.Ct. 458, 460-61 , 560 N.E.2d 1295 (1990) (imposing a reasonable time in a nonexclusive brokerage agreement to sell a business held proper). Plymouth Port, Inc. v.
-
36 F.4th 1 First CircuitMay 27, 2022
Alexander v. Berman, 560 N.E.2d 1295, 1298 (Mass. App. Ct. 1990).
-
8 Mass. L. Rptr. 699 Massachusetts Superior CourtAugust 11, 1998
See also Alexander v. Berman, 29 Mass.App.Ct. 458, 461 (1990). Here, the necessity for the loan to close as soon as possible so that CPI would not be forced into bankruptcy was made known to Rezendes when he was retained.
-
772 N.E.2d 1078 Massachusetts Appeals CourtAugust 2, 2002
Alexander v. Berman, 29 Mass. App. Ct. 458, 462 (1990).
-
912 N.E.2d 18 Massachusetts Appeals CourtAugust 26, 2009
See, e.g., Alexander v. Berman, 29 Mass. App. Ct. 458, 461 (1990).
-
1992 Mass. App. Div. 234 Mass. Dist. Ct., App. Div.December 7, 1992
Baker Yacht Basin, Inc., 223 Mass. 500 (1916); Alexander v. Berman, 29 Mass. App. Ct. 458, 461 (1990).
-
12 Mass. L. Rptr. 724 Massachusetts Superior CourtDecember 18, 2000
Alexander v. Berman, 29 Mass.App.Ct. 458, 462 (1990). For purposes of the Statute, “[a] finder has been defined as one who ‘merely indentify[ies] a business opportunity’ for another.” State Tax Auditing & Research, Inc. v.
-
13 Mass. L. Rptr. 264 Massachusetts Superior CourtMay 21, 2001
See, e.g., Alexander v. Berman, 29 Mass.App.Ct. 458, 461 (1990). In this case, the sellers, by the inclusion of Section 4 in Amendment No. 3, clearly were intent upon having Concentra’s payment as “required pursuant to Section 1.”
-
2002 Mass. App. Div. 225 Mass. Dist. Ct., App. Div.December 30, 2002
Alexander v. Berman, 29 Mass. App. Ct. 458 (1990); Plymouth Port, Inc. v. Smith, 26 Mass App. Ct. 572 (1988), further appellate review denied, Plymouth Port, Inc. v. Smith, 403 Mass. 1106 (1988).