Citing references
Opinions citing Row v. Holt, 834 N.E.2d 1074 (Ind. Ct. App. 2005)
6 citing cases
-
864 N.E.2d 1011 Indiana Supreme CourtApril 24, 2007
Row v. Holt, 834 N.E.2d 1074, 1089 (Ind.Ct.App.2005). We granted transfer. Row v. Holt, 2006 Ind. LEXIS 565 (Ind. June 28, 2006). I.
-
N.D. IndianaAugust 23, 2023
City of Kendallville, 577 F.3d 776, 780 (7th Cir. 2009) (quoting Row v. Holt, 834 N.E.2d 1074 , 1088–89 (Ind. Ct. App. 2005)).
-
577 F.3d 776 Seventh CircuitAugust 14, 2009
Bentz relies in part on Row v. Holt, 834 N.E.2d 1074 (Ind.Ct.App.2005), vacated, 864 N.E.2d 1011 (Ind.2007), for her argument that false arrest and false imprisonment are distinct torts under Indiana law.
-
442 F. Supp. 2d 587 N.D. IndianaJuly 5, 2006
Row v. Holt, 834 N.E.2d 1074, 1088-89 (Ind.Ct.App.2005) (citing Dietz v. Finlay Fine Jewelry Corp., 754 N.E.2d 958, 967-68 (Ind.Ct.App.2001)).
-
858 N.E.2d 103 Indiana Supreme CourtDecember 13, 2006
[3] Of course, law enforcement has certain responsibilities once such information is received, the scope of which this Court is now considering in Row v. Holt, 834 N.E.2d 1074 (Ind. Ct.App.2005), transfer granted, No. 1501-0606-CV-239, 2006 Ind.
-
904 F. Supp. 2d 914 N.D. IndianaOctober 23, 2012
See Row v. Holt, 834 N.E.2d 1074, 1088-89 (Ind.Ct.App.2005), vacated, 864 N.E.2d 1011 (Ind.2007) (citing Dietz v. Finlay Fine Jewelry Corp., 754 N.E.2d 958, 967-68 (Ind.Ct.App.2001)).