Citing references
Opinions citing Jimenez v. Cnty. of Los Angeles, 29 Cal. Rptr. 3d 553 (2005)
60 citing cases
-
242 Cal. Rptr. 3d 314 California Court of Appeals, 5th DistrictJanuary 10, 2019
County of Los Angeles (2005) 130 Cal.App.4th 133 , 142, 29 Cal.Rptr.3d 553 ( Jimenez ).)
-
55 Cal. Rptr. 3d 1 California Court of AppealFebruary 20, 2007
(Jimenez v. County of Los Angeles, supra, 130 Cal.App.4th at p. 142 .)
-
California Court of AppealJuly 16, 2013 Unpublished
(Jimenez v. County of Los Angeles (2005) 130 Cal.App.4th 133, 140 .) 5. I. DUTY “It is now well established that California law requires landowners to maintain land in their possession and control in a reasonably safe condition.
-
171 Cal. App. 4th 564 California Court of AppealFebruary 25, 2009
(See, e.g., Jimenez v. County of Los Angeles (2005) 130 Cal.App.4th 133, 140 [ 29 Cal.Rptr.3d 553 ].)
-
139 Cal. App. 4th 1271 California Court of AppealMay 26, 2006
Glucksberg (1997) 521 U.S. 702, 720 , 117 S.Ct. 2258 , 138 L.Ed.2d 772 ; see also Jimenez v. County of Los Angeles (2005) 130 Cal.App.4th 133, 141 , 29 Cal. Rptr.3d 553 .)
-
231 Cal. App. 4th 1005 California Court of AppealNovember 24, 2014
(Jimenez v. County of Los Angeles (2005) 130 Cal.App.4th 133, 140 [ 29 Cal.Rptr.3d 553 ]; Florio v. Lau (1998) 68 Cal.App.4th 637, 653 [ 80 Cal.Rptr.2d 409 ].)
-
243 Cal. App. 4th 427 California Court of AppealDecember 28, 2015
(Jimenez v. County of Los Angeles (2005) 130 Cal.App.4th 133, 140 [ 29 Cal.Rptr.3d 553 ]; Gafcon, Inc. v. Ponsor & Associates (2002) 98 Cal.App.4th 1388, 1426 [ 120 Cal.Rptr.2d 392 ].)
-
187 Cal. App. 4th 1063 California Court of AppealAugust 24, 2010
Glucksberg (1997) 521 U.S. 702, 720 [ 138 L.Ed.2d 772 , 117 S.Ct. 2258 ]; see also Jimenez v. County of Los Angeles (2005) 130 Cal.App.4th 133, 141 [ 29 Cal.Rptr.3d 553 ].)” (People v. Travis, supra, 139 Cal.App.4th 1271, 1293 .)
-
44 Cal. Rptr. 3d 116 California Court of AppealMay 26, 2006
(Jimenez v. County of Los Angeles (2005) 130 Cal.App.4th 133, 140 [ 29 Cal.Rptr.3d 553 ].)
-
49 Cal. Rptr. 3d 675 California Court of AppealOctober 5, 2006
Glucksberg, supra, 521 U.S. at p. 720 , 117 S.Ct. 2258 ; Jimenez v. County of Los Angeles (2005) 130 Cal.App.4th 133, 141 , 29 Cal.Rptr.3d 553 .
-
California Court of AppealApril 25, 2016 Unpublished
County of Los Angeles, supra, 130 Cal.App.4th at p. 143 [“right to a speedy confirmation of the officers’ probable cause determination by use of laboratory testing” was not a fundamental liberty interest].)7 2.
-
California Court of AppealJanuary 10, 2019
County of Los Angeles (2005) 130 Cal.App.4th 133, 142 (Jimenez).)
-
California Court of AppealJuly 17, 2019
(Jimenez v. County of Los Angeles, supra, 130 Cal.App.4th at p. 140 .)
-
California Court of AppealJuly 17, 2019
(Jimenez v. County of Los Angeles (2005) 130 Cal.App.4th 133, 140 .) “We exercise our independent judgment as to the legal effect of the undisputed facts [citation] and must affirm on any ground supported by the record.” (Ibid.)
-
California Court of AppealDecember 4, 2020 Unpublished
(Jimenez v. County of Los Angeles, supra, 130 Cal.App.4th at p. 140 .)
-
California Court of AppealAugust 7, 2023 Unpublished
(Jimenez v. County of Los Angeles (2005) 130 Cal.App.4th 133, 140 .)
-
California Court of AppealJanuary 5, 2024 Unpublished
(Jimenez v. County of Los Angeles (2005) 130 Cal.App.4th 133, 140 (Jimenez).)
-
California Court of AppealSeptember 30, 2024
(Jimenez v. County of Los Angeles (2005) 130 Cal.App.4th 133, 140 .) A.
-
California Court of AppealOctober 23, 2024
(Jimenez v. County of Los Angeles (2005) 130 Cal.App.4th 133, 140 .) A.
-
California Court of AppealSeptember 22, 2014 Unpublished
(See Jimenez v. County of Los Angeles (2005) 130 Cal.App.4th 133, 144 [“qualified immunity applies only to individuals . . . and not to municipalities”].) D.
-
California Court of AppealMarch 26, 2015 Unpublished
Hopkins Real Estate Group (2011) 193 Cal.App.4th 849, 861 ; Jimenez v. County of Los Angeles (2005) 130 Cal.App.4th 133, 140 .) 6 A claim as presented is a claim that fails to comply substantially with sections 910 and 910.2.
-
California Court of AppealAugust 26, 2015 Unpublished
(Jimenez v. County of Los Angeles (2005) 130 Cal.App.4th 133, 140 .) 2. Officer Pope did not owe appellants a duty of care.
-
California Court of AppealJanuary 28, 2016 Unpublished
(Jimenez v. County of Los Angeles (2005) 130 Cal.App.4th 133, 140 ; Reyes v. Kosha (1998) 65 Cal.App.4th 451, 457-458 .)
-
California Court of AppealMay 16, 2016 Unpublished
(Jimenez v. County of Los Angeles (2005) 130 Cal.App.4th 133, 140 .) We view the evidence in the light most favorable to the nonmoving, losing party. (Fazio, at pp. 1057–1508.)
-
California Court of AppealJune 16, 2016 Unpublished
(Jimenez v. County of Los Angeles (2005) 130 Cal.App.4th 133, 140 .) We view the evidence in the light most favorable to the nonmoving, losing party. (Fazio, at pp. 1057–1508.)