TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Citing references

Opinions citing Lord v. Murphy, 561 A.2d 1013 (Me. 1989)

13 citing cases

  1. Polley v. Atwell
    581 A.2d 410 Supreme Judicial Court of MaineOctober 17, 1990

    Murphy, 561 A.2d 1013, 1015 (Me.1989) (quoting Mitchell v.

  2. 80 F. Supp. 2d 491 E.D. PennsylvaniaJanuary 21, 2000

    In Lord v. Murphy, 561 A.2d 1013 (Me.1989), a father in Kentucky brought a Section 1983 claim against social workers in Maine who failed to give him notice of his children’s placement in foster care after their removal from their mother’s home.

  3. Maine SuperiorAugust 17, 2010 Unpublished

    Lord v. Murphy, 561 A.2d 1013, 1017 (Me. 1989). The Law Court has held that if a prior legal ruling in a case is erroneous it may be an abuse of discretion to invoke the law of the case doctrine as a reason for not revisiting it. Id.

  4. 845 P.2d 130 New Mexico Supreme CourtAugust 28, 1992

    Roper, 302 Ark. 125 , 788 S.W.2d 470 (1990); Lord v. Murphy, 561 A.2d 1013 (Me. 1989); Breault v. Chairman of Bd. of Fire Comm'rs, 401 Mass. 26 , 513 N.E.2d 1277 (1987), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 906 , 108 S.Ct. 1078 , 99 L.Ed.2d 237 (1988); Anderson v.

  5. Gray v. State
    624 A.2d 479 Supreme Judicial Court of MaineMay 11, 1993

    Scherer, 468 U.S. 183 , 193-94 & nn. 11 & 12, 104 S.Ct. 3012 , 3018-19 & nn. 11 & 12, 82 L.Ed.2d 139 (1984); Myers, 810 F.2d at 1469 ; Lord v. Murphy, 561 A.2d 1013, 1017 (Me.1989).

  6. 622 A.2d 74 Supreme Judicial Court of MaineMarch 1, 1993

    Forsyth, 472 U.S. 511, 524-26 , 105 S.Ct. 2806, 2184-85 , 86 L.Ed.2d 411 (1985); Lord v. Murphy, 561 A.2d 1013, 1015 (Me.1989).

  7. Webb v. Haas
    665 A.2d 1005 Supreme Judicial Court of MaineOctober 10, 1995

    Murphy, 561 A.2d 1013, 1015 (Me.1989). 3 . 14 M.R.S.A. § 859 (Supp.1994) provides that [i]f a person, liable to any action mentioned, fraudulently conceals the cause thereof from the person entitled thereto, or if a fraud is committed which entitles any

  8. 576 A.2d 196 Supreme Judicial Court of MaineJune 8, 1990

    An interlocutory decision is ap-pealable under the collateral order exception: *200 Lord v. Murphy, 561 A.2d 1013, 1015 (Me.1989).

  9. 669 A.2d 159 Supreme Judicial Court of MaineDecember 26, 1995

    Murphy, 561 A.2d 1013, 1015 (Me.1989) (defendant DHS social workers claimed immunity provided by the Maine Tort Claims Act). In the instant case, the City moved to dismiss the Owners’ claim prior to the summary judgment stage.

  10. 625 A.2d 904 Supreme Judicial Court of MaineMay 28, 1993

    Murphy, 561 A.2d 1013, 1015 (Me.1989) (quoting Mitchell v. Forsyth, 472 U.S. 511, 526 , 105 S.Ct. 2806, 2815 , 86 L.Ed.2d 411 (1985)).

  11. 2022 ME 39, 277 A.3d 369 Supreme Judicial Court of MaineJune 28, 2022

    Lindell, 2008 ME 59, ¶ 8 , 942 A.2d 1226 ; Lord v. Murphy, 561 A.2d 1013, 1015-16 (Me. 1989).

  12. Perry v. Dean
    Maine SuperiorJune 5, 2017 Unpublished

    Lord v. Murphy, 561 A.2d 1013, 1017 (Me. 1989). "The Due Process Clause protects individuals against two types of government action. So called-substantive due process .. . and procedural due process." United States v.

  13. Clavet v. Dean
    Maine SuperiorJanuary 8, 2020 Unpublished

    See Lord v. Murphy, 561 A.2d 1013, 1016 (Me. 1989) (citing 18 C. Wright, A. Miller & E. Cooper, Federal Practice and Procedure § 4478, at 790 (1981)). Mr. Dean argues that regardless of the change in law, Mr.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list