TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Citing references

Opinions citing Simms v. Constantine, 688 A.2d 1 (Md. Ct. Spec. App. 1997)

18 citing cases

  1. State v. Rovin
    472 Md. 317 Court of Appeals of MarylandMay 26, 2021

    Reed, 500 U.S. 478, 495 (1991), and two subsequent opinions that cited Burns—Simms v. Constantine, 113 Md. App. 291, 306 , 688 A.2d 1, 8 (1997) and Van de Kamp v. Goldstein, 555 U.S. 335, 343 (2009).

  2. 712 A.2d 585 Court of Special Appeals of MarylandJuly 1, 1998

    Renewable Natural Resources Found., 114 Md.App. 224, 232 , 689 A.2d 662 (1997); Simms v. Constantine, 113 Md.App. 291, 294 , 688 A.2d 1 (1997).

  3. 909 A.2d 1101 Court of Special Appeals of MarylandOctober 27, 2006

    There has yet been no evidentiary hearing____” Simms v. Constantine, 113 Md.App. 291, 294 , 688 A.2d 1 (1997). We must presume all well pleaded facts in the complaint, and any inferences that can be drawn therefrom, to be true. Fioretti v.

  4. 751 A.2d 1 Court of Special Appeals of MarylandMay 2, 2000

    Id., 124 Md.App. 447 , 722 A.2d 441 (citing Simms, 113 Md.App. at 296 , 688 A.2d 1 ); see also Faya v. Almaraz, 329 Md. 435, 443 , 620 A.2d 327 (1993).

  5. Nelson v. Debbas
    862 A.2d 1083 Court of Special Appeals of MarylandDecember 8, 2004

    Simms, supra, 113 Md.App. at 296 , 688 A.2d 1 (alterations added) (quoting Faya v. Almaraz, 329 Md. 435, 443 , 620 A.2d 327 (1993)).

  6. 722 A.2d 441 Court of Special Appeals of MarylandJanuary 7, 1999

    Constantine, 113 Md.App. 291, 295 , 688 A.2d 1 (1997) (quoting Stone v. Chicago Title Ins. Co., 330 Md. 329, 333-34 , 624 A.2d 496 (1993)).

  7. Nero v. Mosby
    233 F. Supp. 3d 463 D. MarylandJanuary 27, 2017

    See Simms v.

  8. 890 F.3d 106 Fourth CircuitMay 7, 2018

    Simms v. Constantine , 113 Md.App. 291 , 688 A.2d 1 , 7 n.2 (1997) (quoting Eliason v. Funk , 233 Md. 351 , 196 A.2d 887 , 889-90 (1964) ).

  9. Lopata v. Miller
    712 A.2d 24 Court of Special Appeals of MarylandJune 24, 1998

    Simms v. *84 Constantine, 113 Md.App. 291, 296-97 , 688 A.2d 1 (1997) (quoting Faya v.

  10. Rauch v. McCall
    761 A.2d 76 Court of Special Appeals of MarylandSeptember 6, 2000

    Miller, 122 Md.App. 76, 83-84 , 712 A.2d 24 , cert. denied, 351 Md. 286 , 718 A.2d 234 (1998) (citing Simms v. Constantine, 113 Md.App. 291, 296-97 , 688 A.2d 1 (1997)) (internal citations omitted).

  11. Davis v. DiPino
    708 A.2d 357 Court of Special Appeals of MarylandApril 16, 1998

    City of Annapolis, 113 Md.App. 440 , 688 A.2d 448 (1997); Simms v. Constantine, 113 Md.App. 291 , 688 A.2d 1 (1997); Williams v. Prince George's County, 112 Md.App. 526 , 685 A.2d 884 (1996). Some immunities derive from common law and others are statutory.

  12. 719 A.2d 998 Court of Special Appeals of MarylandOctober 28, 1998

    Simms v. Constantine, 113 Md.App. 291, 294 , 688 A.2d 1 (1997)(quoting Bennett Heating & Air Conditioning, Inc. v.

  13. 119 A.3d 80 Court of Special Appeals of MarylandJuly 6, 2015

    Simms v. Constantine, 113 Md.App. 291, 318-319 , 688 A.2d 1 (1997). *5 DISCUSSION a. Is the State’s appeal proper?

  14. 211 A.3d 543 Court of Special Appeals of MarylandJune 26, 2019

    O'Hara , 320 Md. at 113 , 576 A.2d 766 ; accord Simms v. Constantine , 113 Md. App. 291 , 302-05, 688 A.2d 1 (1997). The Butz v.

  15. 767 A.2d 926 Court of Special Appeals of MarylandMarch 2, 2001

    Simms v. Constantine, 113 Md.App. 291, 295 , 688 A.2d 1 (1997). “We then decide whether the well-pleaded allegations of fact in the complaint reveal any set of facts that would entitle the plaintiff to relief.

  16. (2008)
    93 Op. Att'y Gen. 68 Maryland Attorney General ReportsMay 1, 2008

    Simms v. Constantine , 113 Md. App. 291 , 313 , 688 A.2d 1 (1997) (quoting Burns v. Reed , 500 U.S. 478 , 494-95 (1991)).

  17. State v. Preston
    700 A.2d 1190 Connecticut Appellate CourtSeptember 23, 1997
  18. (1998)
    83 Op. Att'y Gen. 84 Maryland Attorney General ReportsMay 5, 1998

    Flax, 340 Md. 690 , 688 A.2d 1 (1995). In this case, that purpose is the creation of competitive parity between State-chartered credit unions and their federally chartered counterparts.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list