TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Citing references

Opinions citing Holden v. State, 305 A.2d 320 (Del. 1973)

38 citing cases

Negative treatment
Depth Newest Oldest Most cited
Majority opinions only
1 2–3 4–9 10+ times cited
  1. White v. State
    906 A.2d 82 Supreme Court of DelawareSeptember 14, 2006

    [7] 305 A.2d 320 (Del.1973). [8] Id. at 321 . [9] Id. [10] Id. [11] Id. [12] Id. [13] Id. [14] Id. [15] Id. [16] Id at 321-22. [17] Id. at 322 .

  2. State v. Rivera
    Superior Court of DelawareAugust 16, 2016

    State, 906 A.2d 82, 86 (Del. 2006)). 12 Id. at 421-22 (abrogating Holden v. State, 305 A.2d 320 (Del. 1973)).

  3. Lecates v. State
    987 A.2d 413 Supreme Court of DelawareOctober 15, 2009

    White, 906 A.2d at 86 (citing Holden, 305 A.2d 320 ). 91 . White, 906 A.2d at 86 (citing Hoey v. State, 689 A.2d 1177, 1181 (Del.1997)).

  4. Lecates v. State
    975 A.2d 799 Supreme Court of DelawareJune 23, 2009

    White, 906 A.2d at 86 (citing Holden, 305 A.2d 320 ). 91 . White, 906 A.2d at 86 (citing Hoey v. State, 689 A.2d 1177, 1181 (Del.1997)).

  5. McNulty v. State
    655 A.2d 1214 Supreme Court of DelawareApril 5, 1995

    Holden v. State, Del.Supr., 305 A.2d 320, 322 (1973); Marvel v. State, Del.Supr., 290 A.2d 641, 644 (1972) (noting that presumption is rebuttable).

  6. Potts v. State
    458 A.2d 1165 Supreme Court of DelawareMarch 11, 1983

    Holden v. State, supra, at 322.

  7. Miller v. State
    310 A.2d 867 Supreme Court of DelawareSeptember 6, 1973

    Holden v. State, Del.Supr., 305 A.2d 320 at 322 (1973).

  8. State v. McNair
    Superior Court of DelawareAugust 7, 2020

    .); see also Holden v. State, 305 A.2d 320 (Del. 1973) (overturning defendant’s convictions because defendants were only passengers in the vehicle where contraband was found.); see also Crawley v.

  9. State v. McNair
    Superior Court of DelawareAugust 12, 2020

    .); see also Holden v. State, 305 A.2d 320 (Del. 1973) (overturning defendant’s convictions because defendants were only passengers in the vehicle where contraband was found.); see also Crawley v.

  10. Hughes v. State
    437 A.2d 559 Supreme Court of DelawareNovember 18, 1981

    Holden v. State, Del. Supr., 305 A.2d 320, 322 (1973). That test has been met in this case.

  11. Robertson v. State
    596 A.2d 1345 Supreme Court of DelawareJuly 31, 1991

    Holden v. State, Del.Supr., 305 A.2d 320, 321 (1973) (citations omitted). Therefore, we do not find the instruction to be inadequate.

  12. Riley v. State
    496 A.2d 997 Supreme Court of DelawareJuly 12, 1985

    Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 , 99 S.Ct. 2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979); Holden v. State, Del.Supr., 305 A.2d 320, 322 (1973). Defendant contends that the facts are insufficient to sustain a conviction of intentional murder.

  13. Jensen v. State
    482 A.2d 105 Supreme Court of DelawareSeptember 11, 1984

    Holden v. State, Del.Supr., 305 A.2d 320, 322 (1973). The record here amply supports the verdict entered against the defendant. Affirmed. 1 . 11 DelC. § 2307 provides in part: § 2307. Issuance of a search warrant; contents.

  14. Cook v. State
    374 A.2d 264 Supreme Court of DelawareApril 28, 1977

    g., Holden v. State, Del.Supr., 305 A.2d 320 (1973); Miller v. State, Del.Supr., 310 A.2d 867 (1973); it continues to be the controlling standard by which to evaluate circumstantial evidence. ****** Affirmed. 1 . 11 Del.C.

  15. Jackson v. State
    643 A.2d 1360 Supreme Court of DelawareJuly 15, 1994

    Jackson’s reliance on Holden v. State, Del.Supr., 305 A.2d 320 (1973) and Crawley v.

  16. Williams v. State
    539 A.2d 164 Supreme Court of DelawareMarch 10, 1988

    Holden v. State, Del.Supr., 305 A.2d 320, 322 (1973), *169 quoted in Potts v. State, Del.Supr., 458 A.2d 1165, 1167 (1983). See also Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. at 319 , 99 S.Ct. at 2789 ; Holland v.

  17. Hardin v. State
    844 A.2d 982 Supreme Court of DelawareMarch 11, 2004

    Holden v. State, 305 A.2d 320, 322 (Del.1973).

  18. MacK v. State
    312 A.2d 319 Supreme Court of DelawareSeptember 27, 1973

    State, Del.Supr., 254 A.2d 852 (1969); Holden v. State, Del.Supr., 305 A.2d 320 (1973). Inapplicable, too, is the general “dominion, control, and authority” definition used in the presumption arising from “possession” of recently stolen goods.

  19. Renzi v. State
    320 A.2d 711 Supreme Court of DelawareMay 1, 1974

    State, Del.Supr., 303 A.2d 658 (1973); Holden v. State, Del.Supr., 305 A.2d 320 (1973). We reach no other ground of appeal.

  20. Staples v. State
    1974 OK CR 208, 528 P.2d 1131 Court of Criminal Appeals of OklahomaNovember 20, 1974

    Olson, R.I., 319 A.2d 27 (1974); Holden v. State, Del.Supr., 305 A.2d 320 (1973); Corrao v. State, Ind.App., 290 N.E.2d 484 (1972). Holden v. State, supra, is particularly apposite here.

  21. Van Arsdall v. State
    486 A.2d 1 Supreme Court of DelawareNovember 19, 1984

    Holden v. State, Del.Supr., 305 A.2d 320, 322 (1973). Hence, the trial court was correct when it instructed the jury to disregard defense counsel’s erroneous statement.

  22. Ledda v. State
    564 A.2d 1125 Supreme Court of DelawareSeptember 11, 1989

    See, e.g., Holden v. State, Del.Supr., 305 A.2d 320, 322 (1973) (custodian of automobile has dominion and control of contraband found in vehicle).

  23. Hoey v. State
    689 A.2d 1177 Supreme Court of DelawareJanuary 16, 1997

    See Holden v.

  24. Lively v. State
    427 A.2d 882 Supreme Court of DelawareMarch 9, 1981

    See Holden v. State, Del.Supr., 305 A.2d 320 (1973). C.

  25. McCarthy v. State
    372 A.2d 180 Supreme Court of DelawareFebruary 9, 1977

    The test for sufficiency, as established in Holden v. State, Del.Supr., 305 A.2d 320 (1973) has been met. Affirmed. 1 . 11 Del.C.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list