Citing references
Opinions citing Campbell v. United States, 795 F. Supp. 1118 (N.D. Ga. 1990)
7 citing cases
-
514 F.3d 1194 Eleventh CircuitJanuary 28, 2008
See, e.g., Campbell v.
-
N.D. OhioDecember 22, 2019
Plaintiffs cite Campbell v. United States as support for their position that this was enough. 795 F. Supp. 1118 (N.D. Ga. 1990). In Campbell, box 2 of the SF-95 listed the “Name and Address of Claimant” as Patricia Campbell, with an asterisk.
-
D. South DakotaSeptember 14, 2026
(citing Campbell v. United States, 795 F. Supp. 1118, 1121 (N.D.
-
134 So. 3d 1084 District Court of Appeal of FloridaJanuary 8, 2014
Campbell v. United States, 795 F.Supp. 1118, 1124 (N.D.Ga.1990); accord Keel v. Banach, 624 So.2d 1022, 1027 (Ala.1993).
-
920 F. Supp. 788 W.D. MichiganFebruary 29, 1996
United States, 810 F.Supp. 256, 258 (D.Minn.1992); Campbell v. United States, 795 F.Supp. 1118, 1121-22 (N.D.Ga.1990); Locke v. United States, 351 F.Supp. 185 (D.Hawaii 1972)).
-
D. AlaskaFebruary 23, 2023
United States, 752 F.2d 1352, 1354 (9th Cir. 1985)). 45 Alford, 2006 WL 8455343 , at *3–4. 46 Turner, 514 F.3d at 1201 (citing Campbell v. United States, 795 F. Supp. 1118 , 1121– 22 (N.D.
-
D. South DakotaJanuary 17, 2025
See Campbell v. United States, 795 F. Supp. 1118, 1121 (N.D. Ga. 1990) (holding three individual plaintiffs met jurisdictional requirements despite submitting a single SF95 because all three plaintiffs were listed as claimants on the one form).