Citing references
Opinions citing Daly v. Aspen Ctr. for Women's Health, Inc., 134 P.3d 450 (Colo. Ct. App. 2005)
15 citing cases
-
183 P.3d 636 Colorado Court of AppealsNovember 29, 2007
Daly v. Aspen Ctr. for *641 Women's Health, Inc., 134 P.3d 450, 454 (Colo.App.2005).
-
140 P.3d 273 Colorado Court of AppealsMay 4, 2006
Russell, supra, 44 P.3d at 1067 ; Daly v. Aspen Ctr. for Women’s Health, Inc., 134 P.3d 450 , 2005 WL 2456875 (Colo.App. No. 04CA0904, Oct. 6, 2005).
-
2020 COA 145 Colorado Court of AppealsOctober 15, 2020
See Daly v. Aspen Ctr. for Women’s Health, Inc., 134 P.3d 450, 452 (Colo. App. 2005); see also § 12-36-117(1)(m), C.R.S. 2019; § 25-3-103.7, C.R.S. 2019; Hall v. Frankel, 190 P.3d 852, 861 (Colo. App. 2008).
-
D. ColoradoMay 8, 2023
Daly v. Aspen Ctr. for Women’s Health, Inc., 134 P.3d 450, 452 (Colo. App. 2005).
-
D.D.C.June 13, 2025
Daly v. Aspen Ctr. for Women’s Health, Inc., 134 P.3d 450, 454 (Colo. Ct. App. 2005). However, many courts use the terms interchangeably. See, e.g., id.
-
190 P.3d 852 Colorado Court of AppealsJune 26, 2008
Aspen Cir. for Women's Health, Inc., 134 P.3d 450, 452 (Colo.App.2005) (health center not liable because it cannot control physician's medical judgment); Freedman v. Kaiser Found.
-
141 A.3d 752 Supreme Court of ConnecticutJune 14, 2016
Aspen Center for Women's Health, Inc., 134 P.3d 450 , 454 (Colo.App.2005) (when plaintiff "seeks to establish vicarious liability for a physical tort, she is asserting apparent agency, not apparent authority").
-
411 P.3d 717 Colorado Court of AppealsFebruary 28, 2013
Montoya, 904 P.2d 468 , 472-73 (Colo.1995) ; Daly v. Aspen Ctr. for Women's Health, Inc., 134 P.3d 450 , 452 (Colo.App.2005). 2. Borrowed Servant ¶ 33 Another rationale for vicarious liability is the borrowed servant doctrine.
-
2020 COA 144, 490 P.3d 930 Colorado Court of AppealsOctober 8, 2020
Daly v. Aspen Ctr. for Women’s Health, Inc., 134 P.3d 450, 452 (Colo. 2005). ¶ 15 “The question of whether an employee [wa]s acting within the scope of the employment is a question of fact . . . .” Raleigh, 130 P.3d at 1019 .
-
Tenth CircuitJanuary 30, 2018 Unpublished
In Daly v. Aspen Center for Women’s Health, Inc., 134 P.3d 450 , 453–54 (Colo.
-
D. ColoradoOctober 19, 2020
Daly v. Aspen Center for Women’s Health, Inc., 134 P.3d 450, 452-53 (Colo. App. 2005). Here, the unrebutted evidence shows that CHP is a private medical services organization, not a medical provider.
-
D. ColoradoJune 22, 2021
ECF No. 62 at 11; see also Daly v. Aspen Ctr. For Women’s Health, Inc., 134 P.3d 450 , 452–53 (Colo. App. 2005).
-
D. ColoradoSeptember 18, 2025
Indeed, respondeat superior is best understood as a theory that imputes substantive liability of an employee to the employer, see Daly v. Aspen Ctr. for Women’s Health, Inc., 134 P.3d 450, 452 (Colo.
-
N.D. IllinoisSeptember 18, 2025
See, e.g., Daly v. Aspen Ctr. for Women’s Health, Inc., 134 P.3d 450, 452 (Colo. App. 2005) (“The doctrine of respondeat superior is based on the theory that the employee is the agent of the employer. . . .
-
Colorado Court of AppealsJune 18, 2026 Unpublished
See Daly v. Aspen Ctr. for Women’s Health, Inc., 134 P.3d 450, 452 (Colo. App. 2005).