TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Citing references

Opinions citing Walczyk v. Rio, 496 F.3d 139 (2d Cir. 2007)

414 citing cases

  1. 740 F.3d 817 Second CircuitJanuary 21, 2014

    Walczyk v. Rio, 496 F.3d 139, 161 (2d Cir.2007).

  2. 681 F.3d 122 Second CircuitMay 14, 2012

    Walczyk v. Rio, 496 F.3d 139, 158 (2d Cir.2007) (internal quotation mark omitted). Even if the supposed errors in Mr.

  3. D. ConnecticutJanuary 10, 2020

    Walczyk v. Rio, 496 F.3d 139, 157 (2d Cir. 2007) (citations omitted).

  4. 667 F. Supp. 2d 391 D. VermontSeptember 14, 2009

    Walczyk v. Rio, 496 F.3d 139, 154 (2d Cir.2007) (internal citations omitted). Assuming a constitutional violation, the next question is “whether the right was clearly established ... in light of the specific context of the case.” Id.

  5. 599 F.3d 129 Second CircuitMarch 16, 2010

    Walczyk v. Rio, 496 F.3d 139, 166-67 (2d Cir.2007) (Sotomayor, J., concurring).

  6. 723 F.3d 382 Second CircuitJuly 23, 2013

    See Walczyk v. Rio, 496 F.3d 139, 153 (2d Cir.2007).

  7. 29 F.4th 93 Second CircuitMarch 23, 2022

    Walczyk v. Rio, 496 F.3d 139, 156 (2d Cir. 2007) (citation omitted).

  8. 710 F. Supp. 2d 408 S.D. New YorkSeptember 13, 2010

    Bochicchio, 374 Fed.Appx. 114, 115-17 (2d Cir.2010); Taravella, 599 F.3d at 135 (Straub, J., dissenting); Walczyk v. Rio, 496 F.3d 139, 166-67 (2d Cir.2007) (Sotomayor, J., concurring). 136 .

  9. 46 Misc. 3d 435 New York Supreme CourtOctober 23, 2014

    v Rio, 496 F3d at 156 ).

  10. N.D. New YorkJune 16, 2026

    Walczyk v. Rio, 496 F.3d 139 , 155–56 (2d Cir. 2007) (citing Franks v. Delaware, 438 U.S. 154, 171 (1978)); see also Fabrikant v. French, 691 F.3d 193, 214 (2d Cir. 2012).

  11. 25 F. Supp. 3d 400 S.D. New YorkJuly 3, 2014

    Walczyk v. Rio, 496 F.3d 139, 154 (2d Cir.2007). 18 If, however, the answer to the first question is yes, the Court must decide whether “the right at issue was ‘clearly established’ at the time of defendant’s alleged misconduct.” Pearson v.

  12. 680 F.3d 127 Second CircuitMay 22, 2012

    Town of Wolcott, 599 F.3d 129, 134 (2d Cir.2010) (some internal quotation marks omitted); accord Walczyk v. Rio, 496 F.3d 139 , 154 n. 16 (2d Cir.2007).

  13. Garcia v. Does
    764 F.3d 170 Second CircuitAugust 21, 2014 Dissent

    Miller, 66 F.3d 416, 425 (2d Cir. 1995)) (emphasis added); accord Walczyk v. Rio, 496 F.3d 139, 163 (2d Cir.2007).

  14. 667 F.3d 87 Second CircuitJune 10, 2011

    Town of Wolcott, 599 F.3d 129, 134 (2d Cir.2010) (some internal quotation marks omitted); accord Walczyk v. Rio, 496 F.3d 139 , 154 n. 16 (2d Cir.2007).

  15. Second CircuitAugust 21, 2014

    Miller,  66 F.3d 416, 425  (2d Cir. 1995)) (emphasis added); accord Walczyk v. Rio,  496 F.3d 139, 163  (2d Cir. 2007).  

  16. 511 F.3d 239 Second CircuitDecember 21, 2007

    Walczyk v. Rio, 496 F.3d 139, 154 (2d Cir.2007).

  17. 638 F.3d 89 Second CircuitMarch 8, 2011

    Walczyk v. Rio, 496 F.3d 139, 157 (2d Cir.2007).

  18. Mara v. Rilling
    921 F.3d 48 Second CircuitApril 9, 2019

    See, e.g. , Walczyk v. Rio , 496 F.3d 139 , 153 (2d Cir. 2007).

  19. 834 F.3d 162 Second CircuitAugust 24, 2016

    . § 1291 ; Walczyk v. Rio, 496 F.3d 139, 153 (2d Cir. 2007).

  20. 871 F.3d 164 Second CircuitSeptember 11, 2017

    Walczyk v. Rio, 496 F.3d 139, 156 (2d Cir. 2007) (internal quotation marks omitted).

  21. 560 F. Supp. 2d 153 D. ConnecticutJune 18, 2008

    Walczyk v. Rio, 496 F.3d 139, 156 (2d Cir.2007) (internal quotation marks omitted). “[P]robable cause is a fluid concept ... not readily, or even usefully, reduced to a neat set of legal rules....

  22. 539 F. Supp. 2d 632 E.D. New YorkMarch 17, 2008

    See Walczyk v. Rio, 496 F.3d 139, 154 (2d Cir.2007); Connecticut v. Crotty, 346 F.3d 84 (2003). A. Violation of Constitutional Rights Proceeding to the first issue, whether Sgt. Goldberg violated Mr.

  23. 288 F. App'x 764 Second CircuitAugust 13, 2008

    Gates, 462 U.S. 213, 231 , 103 S.Ct. 2317 , 76 L.Ed.2d 527 (1983); accord Walczyk v. Rio, 496 F.3d 139, 156 (2d Cir.2007).

  24. 814 F. Supp. 2d 130 D. ConnecticutSeptember 2, 2011

    Rio, 496 F.3d 139, 156 (2d Cir.2007) (quoting Weyant v. Okst, 101 F.3d 845, 852 (2d Cir.1996)). The Second Circuit further explained that “probable cause is a fluid concept ... not readily, or even usefully, reduced to a neat set of legal rules ...

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list