Citing references

Owens, 767 F.3d at 403 (quoting Spell, 824 F.2d at 1387 ). In contrast, “[s]poradic or isolated” misconduct is not. Owens, 767 F.3d at 403 . Owens, 767 F.3d 379 , is illustrative.

Owens v. Balt. City State’s Att’ys Off., 767 F.3d 379, 402 (4th Cir. 2014) (emphasis in original).

City State’s Att’ys Off., 767 F.3d 379, 402 (4th Cir. 2014), which is an issue separate and apart from Plaintiff’s unsupported conclusion that Sheriff Lemons had an underlying duty to train his deputies and failed to provide them with any training.

Owens v. Balt. City State’s Attorneys Office, 767 F.3d 379, 402 (4th Cir. 2014) (cleaned up).

Delia, 566 U.S. 377 (2012); see also Owens v. Balt. City State’s Attorney’s Office, 767 F.3d 379 (4th Cir. 2014), cert. denied sub nom. Balt. City Police Dep’t v. Owens, 135 S. Ct. 1893 (2015).

See Owens v. Baltimore City State’s Attorneys Office, 767 F.3d 379 , 395 n.5 (4th Cir. 10 2014).

Delia, 566 U.S. 377 (2012); see also Owens v. Balt. City State’s Attorney’s Office, 767 F.3d 379 (4th Cir. 2014), cert. denied sub nom. Balt. City Police Dep’t v. Owens, 135 S. Ct. 1893 (2015).

Owens, 767 F.3d at 403 (quoting Spell, 824 F.2d at 1387 ). In contrast, “[s]poradic or isolated” misconduct is not. Owens, 767 F.3d at 403 . Owens, 767 F.3d 379 , is illustrative.

Owens, 767 F.3d at 403 (quoting Spell, 824 F.2d at 1387 ). In contrast, “[s]poradic or isolated” misconduct is not. Owens, 767 F.3d at 403 . Owens, 767 F.3d 379 , is illustrative.

Baltimore City State’s Attorneys Office, 767 F.3d 379 (4th Cir. 2014), the plaintiff alleged that the Baltimore City Police Department maintained “a custom, policy, or practice of condoning its officers’ conduct in knowingly, consciously, and repeatedly

Delia, 566 U.S. 377 (2012); see also Owens v. Balt. City State’s Attorney’s Office, 767 F.3d 379 (4th Cir. 2014), cert. denied sub nom. Balt. City Police Dep’t v. Owens, 135 S. Ct. 1893 (2015).

Owens, 767 F.3d 379 , is illustrative.

See Owens v. Baltimore City State's Att'ys Off., 767 F.3d 379, 403 (4th Cir. 2014) (quoting Spell v.

See Owens v. Baltimore City State’s Att’ys Off., 767 F.3d 379 , 388–89 (4th Cir. 2014). A § 1983 claim accrues when a plaintiff “know[s] that he has been hurt and [knows] who inflicted the injury.” Nasim v. Warden, Md.

A comparison with Owens v. Baltimore City State’s Attorney’s Office, 767 F.3d 379 (4th Cir. 2014) demonstrates why.

Delia, 566 U.S. 377 (2012); see also Owens v. Balt. City State’s Attorney’s Office, 767 F.3d 379 (4th Cir. 2014), cert. denied sub nom. Balt. City Police Dep’t v. Owens, 575 U.S. 983 (2015).

Owens v. Balt. City State’s Att’y Off., 767 F.3d 379, 402 (4th Cir. 2014); see Monell, 436 U.S. at 694 . In Counts 9 and 11, Jarrells alleges that the County violated his Fourth and Fourteenth Amendment rights. (Am. Compl. ¶¶ 138, 140, 164, 166).

Md. 2021); accord Owens v. Balt. City State’s Atty’s Off., 767 F.3d 379, 403 (4th Cir. 2014) (“Although prevailing on the merits of a Monell claim is difficult, simply alleging such a claim is, by definition, easier.

Owens v. Baltimore City State’s Att’ys Off., 767 F.3d 379, 402 (4th Cir. 2014). A plaintiff must allege “continued inaction in the face of documented widespread abuses,” Grayson v.

Owens v. Baltimore City State’s Attorneys Office, 767 F.3d 379, 402 (4th Cir. 2014) (quoting Spell v. McDaniel, 824 F.2d 1380 , 1386–91 (4th Cir. 1987)) (internal quotation marks omitted).

Delia, 566 U.S. 377, 383 (2012); Owens v. Balt. City State’s Atty’s Off., 767 F.3d 379, 402 (4th Cir. 2014).

City State’s Atty’s Off., 767 F.3d 379, 402 (4th Cir. 2014) (“Only if a municipality subscribes to a custom, policy, or practice can it be said to have committed an independent act, the sine qua non of Monell liability.”).

Owens v. Balt. City State’s Attorney’s Office, 767 F.3d 379 (4th Cir. 2014) (quoting 42 U.S.C. § 1983 ).

Owens v. Balt. City State’s Attorneys Office, 767 F.3d 379, 402 (4th Cir. 2014); see also Carter v.

Owens v. Baltimore City State’s Attorney’s Office, 767 F.3d 379, 396-97 (4th Cir. 2014). When, as alleged here, police officers fail to disclose exculpatory evidence, the court can infer bad faith. Johnson v. Balt. Police Dep’t., Civil No.