TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Citing references

Opinions citing Nall v. Ala. Utils. Co., 138 So. 411 (Ala. 1931)

12 citing cases

  1. 424 So. 2d 611 Supreme Court of AlabamaDecember 30, 1982

    Likewise, in Nall v. Alabama Utilities Co. , 224 Ala. 33 , 138 So. 411 (1931), O'Quinn was followed, and the original tortfeasor was held responsible for the injuries caused by the negligence of the physician treating the injury.

  2. 267 F.2d 135 Second CircuitMay 22, 1959

    * Nall v. Alabama Utilities Co., 1931, 224 Ala. 33 , 138 So. 411 ; Ash v. Mortensen, 1944, 24 Cal.2d 654 , 150 P.2d 876 ; Persten v. Chesney, Mo.App.1948, 212 S.W.2d 469 , 475; Santer v. New York Central & H. R. R. R., 1876, 66 N.Y. 50 ; Thompson v.

  3. 57 So. 2d 96 Supreme Court of AlabamaJanuary 3, 1952

    Co., 237 Ala. 366 , 186 So. 771 , and *99 cases cited; Nall v. Alabama Utilities Co., 224 Ala. 33 , 138 So. 411 ; Gentry v. Swann Chemical Co., 234 Ala. 313 , 174 So. 530 ; Smith v. Southern Ry. Co., 237 Ala. 372 , 187 So. 195 ; § 272, Title 26, Code 1940.

  4. 20 So. 2d 591 Supreme Court of AlabamaJanuary 18, 1945

    Nall v. Alabama Utilities Co., 224 Ala. 33 , 138 So. 411 ; O’Quinn v. Alston, 213 Ala. 346 , 104 So. 653 , 39 A.L.R. 1263 , Note. It results from the foregoing that the decree of the circuit court is affirmed. GARDNER, C. J., and FOSTER and.

  5. Hanson v. Norton
    103 S.W.2d 1 Supreme Court of MissouriMarch 17, 1937

    Co. et al., 89 Wn. 634 , 155 P. 153 ; Nall v. Utilities Co., 224 Ala. 33 , 138 So. 411 ; Markley v. White (Okla.), 32 P.2d 716 ; Hinkelman v. Steel Corp. et al. (W. Va.), 171 S.E. 538 . We do not deem it necessary to analyze these cases.

  6. 252 N.W. 864 South Dakota Supreme CourtFebruary 23, 1934

    *327 (2d) 269; Nall v. Ala Utilities Co., 224 Ala. 33 , 138 So. 411 ; and also see cases collected in note, 39 A. L. R. 1276. A leading case is Booth & Flinn v.

  7. 73 So. 2d 717 Supreme Court of AlabamaJune 24, 1954

    Nall v. Alabama Utilities Co., 224 Ala. 33 , 138 So. 411 ; O’Quinn v. Alston, 213 Ala. 346 , 104 So. 653 , 39 A.L.R. 1263 ; Atlantic Pacific Stages v. Yandle, 224 Ala. 481 , 140 So. 603 .

  8. Seitz v. Heep
    10 So. 2d 150 Supreme Court of AlabamaOctober 8, 1942

    Alston, 213 Ala. 346 , 104 So. 653 , 39 A.L.R. 1263 ; Nall v. Alabama Utilities Co., 224 Ala. 33 , 138 So. 411 ; Atlantic Pacific Stages, Inc., v. Yandle, 224 Ala. 481 , 140 So. 603 .

  9. 186 So. 179 Supreme Court of AlabamaJanuary 12, 1939

    Yolande Coal & Coke Co., 206 Ala. 642 , 91 So. 493 ; Nall v. Alabama Utilities Co., 224 Ala. 33 , 138 So. 411 ; Donald v. Swann, 24 Ala.App. 463 , 137 So. 178 . The several counts were not subject to the demurrers interposed.

  10. 374 So. 2d 355 Court of Civil Appeals of AlabamaAugust 29, 1979

    Nall v. Alabama Utilities Co., 224 Ala. 33 , 138 So. 411 (1931).

  11. 76 S.W.2d 1101 Missouri Court of AppealsNovember 13, 1934

    Sinclair, 86 Okla. 143 ; Nall v. Ala. Utilities Co. (Ala.), 138 So. 411 ; Tenn. Coal Co. v. Shelby (Ala.), 106 So. 499 ; Wingate v. Evans Model Laundry, 123 Neb. 844, 848 ; Nevell v. McCaughan, 162 Tenn. 532 ; Hennig v. Crested Butte Anthracite Min. Co.

  12. 140 So. 603 Supreme Court of AlabamaJanuary 21, 1932

    R. 1263; Nall v. Alabama Utilities Co., ante, p. 33, 138 So. 411 ; Armstrong, A'dm’x v. Montgomery Street Ry. Co., 123 Ala. 233 , 26 So. 349 .

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list