TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Citing references

Opinions citing Clay v. Doctor William R. Martin & the United States Surgeon Gen. & the United States, 509 F.2d 109 (2d Cir. 1975)

32 citing cases

  1. 600 F.3d 516 Fifth CircuitMarch 16, 2010

    Martin, 509 F.2d 109, 113 (2d Cir.1975) (“[T]he presence of ‘improper parties’ [is] an invalid basis for dismissal of [a] complaint. Misjoinder ... does not justify such an extreme sanction.”); Sabolsky v.

  2. 415 F. Supp. 421 S.D. New YorkMay 17, 1976

    Martin, 509 F.2d 109, 112 (2d Cir. 1975); Byram River v. Village of Port Chester, New York, 394 F.Supp. 618, 628-29 (S.D.N.Y.1975); Owens v. Housing Authority of City of Stamford, 394 F.Supp. 1267, 1270 (D.Conn.1975).

  3. 782 A.2d 807 Court of Appeals of MarylandAugust 16, 2001

    Martin, 509 F.2d 109 (1975); Bailey, Dingee, Neuser & Munney v. Lally, 481 F.Supp. 203 (1979); Valenti v.

  4. 21 B.R. 323 Bankr. S.D. New YorkJune 29, 1982

    Martin, 509 F.2d 109 (2d Cir. 1975); Glazer Steel Corp. v. Yawata Iron & Steel Co., Ltd., D.C., 56 F.R.D. 75 (S.D.N.Y.1972), 3 Moore’s Federal Practice, ¶ 15.08[4] (2d ed.).

  5. 526 F. App'x 94 Second CircuitMay 3, 2013 Unpublished

    Martin, 509 F.2d 109, 113 (2d Cir.1975), a party must show “good cause” to amend his or her complaint if the motion is filed after the deadline imposed by the district court in its scheduling order, Parker v.

  6. 108 F.R.D. 14 S.D. New YorkJuly 9, 1985
  7. 826 F.2d 507 Seventh CircuitJuly 22, 1987

    Winterhalder, 724 *509 F.2d 109 (10th Cir.1983).

  8. 739 F.3d 99 Second CircuitJanuary 7, 2014

    Martin, 509 F.2d 109, 113 (2d Cir.1975) (“[T]he presence of ‘improper parties’ [is] ... an invalid basis for dismissal of [a] complaint. Misjoinder ... does not justify such an extreme sanction.”); Sabolsky v.

  9. 152 F.R.D. 18 S.D. New YorkDecember 6, 1993

    Martin, 509 F.2d 109, 113 (2d Cir.1975); New York v. Cedar Park Concrete Corp., 741 F.Supp. 494, 496 (S.D.N.Y.1990).

  10. 500 F. Supp. 904 D. ConnecticutNovember 18, 1980

    Martin, 509 F.2d 109, 113 (2d Cir. 1975); Middle Atlantic Utilities Co. v. S. M. W. Development Corp., 392 F.2d 380, 384-86 (2d Cir. 1968); Holman v.

  11. 206 F.R.D. 11 D.D.C.January 10, 2002

    Martin, 509 F.2d 109, 113-114 (2d Cir.1975); Price v. Kelly, 847 F.Supp. 163 , 164 n. 1 (D.D.C.1994) (stating that the court would grant the plaintiff leave to allege additional facts).

  12. 655 F. Supp. 346 S.D. New YorkMarch 7, 1987
  13. Bertrand v. Sava
    535 F. Supp. 1020 S.D. New YorkApril 5, 1982

    Martin, 509 F.2d 109 (2d Cir. 1975); Wright & Miller, Federal Practice & Procedure: Civil §§ 1484, 1488 (1971). Such leave “shall be freely given when justice so requires.” Rule 15(a), F.R.Civ.P.

  14. 392 F. Supp. 1335 S.D. New YorkMarch 24, 1975

    Martin, 509 F.2d 109 (2 Cir. 1975) ; Patterson v. MacDougall, 506 F.2d 1, 2-3 (5 Cir. 1975). After reading Mr.

  15. 460 F. Supp. 1102 D. WyomingNovember 17, 1978

    Devitt, 509 F.2d 109 (8th Cir. 1975); Weiner v. Shearson, Hammill & Co., Inc., 521 F.2d 817 (9th Cir. 1975); Steele v. Bunten, unpublished 77-2033 (10th Cir. 1978).

  16. 2016 UT 32, 379 P.3d 1247 Utah Supreme CourtJuly 20, 2016

    Martin, 509 F.2d 109, 1183 (2d Cir.1975) (concluding that a complaint could not be dismissed based only on the presence of "improper parties"); Sa-boisky v.

  17. 621 F. Supp. 1170 S.D. New YorkNovember 19, 1985

    Martin, 509 F.2d 109, 112 (2d Cir.1975); Poloron Products, Inc. v. Lybrand Ross Bros. & Montgomery, 72 F.R.D. 556, 558 (S.D.N.Y.1976). 3 . Section 487 provides, in relevant part; An attorney or counselor who: 1.

  18. 534 F. Supp. 489 N.D. New YorkMarch 10, 1982

    Martin, 509 F.2d 109 (2d Cir. 1975). See also Wright & Miller, supra. The Court is required to accept the plaintiffs’ factual allegations as true. Scheuer v. Rhodes, supra, 416 U.S. at 236 , 94 S.Ct. at 1686 ; Conley v.

  19. 842 F. Supp. 528 N.D. GeorgiaDecember 14, 1993

    Martin, 509 F.2d 109, 113 (2d Cir.1975); 2A James Wm. Moore, Moore’s Federal Practice ¶ 8.08 (2d ed. 1993), and that venue in the Northern District of Georgia is proper pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1355 (a) and (b)(1)(A). Plaintiffs Response [35], p. 5.

  20. 753 F. Supp. 1169 S.D. New YorkDecember 18, 1990

    Martin, 509 F.2d 109 (2d Cir.1975). Consequently, the fact that plaintiff alleges in his civil rights claim that defendant’s actions were unlawful does not prevent him from alleging otherwise in his prima facie tort claim.

  21. 116 B.R. 721 Bankr. C.D. CaliforniaJuly 2, 1990

    Martin, 509 F.2d 109, 113 (2d Cir.1975). 11 .No interested party has made any claim that it would be unfairly hurt in any substantive way by allowing the petition to continue after the jurisdictional defect is cured by dropping Mov-ants.

  22. 670 F. Supp. 96 S.D. New YorkJuly 22, 1987

    Martin, 509 F.2d 109, 112 (2d Cir.1975); Bishop v. Stoneman, 508 F.2d 1224, 1225 (2d Cir.1974); Williams v. Vincent, 508 F.2d 541, 543 (2d Cir.1974).

  23. 728 F. Supp. 990 S.D. New YorkJanuary 4, 1990

    Martin, 509 F.2d 109 (2d Cir.1975). A complaint should not be dismissed for failure to state a claim unless it appears beyond a doubt that plaintiff can prove no set of facts in support of a claim that would entitle him to relief. See Dahlberg v.

  24. 198 F. Supp. 2d 587 S.D. New YorkApril 30, 2002

    Martin, 509 F.2d 109, 113 (2d Cir. 1975) (leave should be denied where it shall cause “undue delay or prejudice to the opposing party”); 11.

  25. Losey v. Roberts
    570 F. Supp. 1465 N.D. New YorkSeptember 23, 1983

    Martin, 509 F.2d 109 (2d Cir.1975). Accordingly, defendant’s motion pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) is denied. IT IS SO ORDERED. 1 .

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list