TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Citing references

Opinions citing Harvey v. Silber, 2 N.W.2d 483 (Mich. 1942)

37 citing cases

  1. 462 N.W.2d 44 Michigan Supreme CourtSeptember 26, 1990

    This Court again considered the problem of causation in a medical malpractice case in Harvey v Silber, 300 Mich 510 ; 2 NW2d 483 (1942).

  2. 854 F.2d 881 Sixth CircuitAugust 16, 1988

    Silber, 300 Mich. 510 , 2 N.W.2d 483 (1942), and Vitale v.

  3. 368 F.2d 626 Fourth CircuitOctober 27, 1966

    Harvey v. Silber, 300 Mich. 510 , 2 N.W.2d 483 (1942). 2 An apt analogy is found in a case which arose in this circuit. 3 In Gardner v.

  4. 443 N.W.2d 431 Michigan Court of AppealsJuly 5, 1989

    This, then, brings us to the case of Harvey v Silber, 300 Mich 510 ; 2 NW2d 483 (1942), wherein the patient died. In Harvey , the decedent suffered a gunshot wound.

  5. 664 P.2d 474 Washington Supreme CourtMay 26, 1983

    Harvey v. Silber, 300 Mich. 510 , 2 N.W.2d 483 (1942). 368 F.2d at 632 . The court in Hicks also drew an analogy to another federal case which imposed liability on a ship's master for failing to attempt to rescue a seaman who had fallen overboard.

  6. 967 F. Supp. 874 E.D. VirginiaJune 18, 1997

    Hicks, 368 F.2d at 632 (citing Harvey v. Silber, 300 Mich. 510 , 2 N.W.2d 483 (1942)). In the Fourth Circuit, Hicks has had an interesting and varying influence.

  7. 475 So. 2d 439 Mississippi Supreme CourtAugust 28, 1985

    Harvey v. Silber, 300 Mich. 510 , 2 N.W.2d 483 (1942). "Proximate cause here is implicit in the breach of duty. Indeed, the duty would be empty if it did not itself embrace the loss as a consequence of its breach." Gardner, supra, at page 287.

  8. 686 P.2d 149 Supreme Court of KansasJuly 13, 1984

    The following authorities appear to require the *1019 establishment of proximate cause by evidence of probability: Harvey v. Silber (1942), 300 Mich. 510 , 2 N.W.2d 483 ; Schuler v. Berger (1967), 275 F. Supp. 120 ; Walden v.

  9. 923 F.2d 1091 Fourth CircuitJanuary 23, 1991

    Harvey v. Silber, 300 Mich. 510 , 2 N.W.2d 483 (1942). 9 In order to address the confusion springing from this passage, we start by making three interpretive points. *1094 The first sentence premises the whole passage.

  10. 364 A.2d 1366 Superior Court of PennsylvaniaSeptember 27, 1976

    See also Harvey v. Silber, 300 Mich. 510 , 2 N.W.2d 483 (1942). In Rewis v. United States, 369 F.2d 595 (5th Cir. 1966) the court found the hospital liable for failing to diagnose aspirin poisoning resulting in an infant's death.

  11. 248 N.W.2d 171 Michigan Supreme CourtDecember 21, 1976

    Harvey v Silber, 300 Mich 510, 517 ; 2 NW2d 483 (1942). [9] We are referred to no cases which have changed this rule.

  12. 498 So. 2d 713 Supreme Court of LouisianaNovember 24, 1986

    Jones relied on Restatement (Second) of Torts, § 323 (1965). [19] In Harvey v. Silber, 300 Mich. 510 , 2 N.W.2d 483 (1942), the patient died of internal hemorrage following a bullet wound through the abdomen.

  13. 868 S.W.2d 594 Tennessee Supreme CourtDecember 22, 1993

    Harvey v. Silber, 300 Mich. 510 , 2 N.W.2d 483 (1942). 368 F.2d at 632 (emphasis added to "substantial possibility").

  14. 1987 OK 69, 741 P.2d 467 Supreme Court of OklahomaJuly 21, 1987

    Harvey v. Silber, 300 Mich. 510 , 2 N.W.2d 483 (1942).” 368 F.2d at 632 . (Emphasis added).

  15. 272 N.E.2d 97 Ohio Supreme CourtJuly 21, 1971

    The following authorities appear to require the establishment of proximate cause by evidence of probability: Harvey v. Silber (1942), 300 Mich. 510 , 2 N. W. 2d 483 ; Schuler v. Berger (1967), 275 F. Supp. 120 ; Walden v. Jones (Ky. 1969), 439 S.

  16. 305 S.E.2d 316 West Virginia Supreme CourtJuly 8, 1983

    Corso, 265 Md. 84 , 288 A.2d 379 (1972); Harvey v. Silber, 300 Mich. 510 , 2 N.W.2d 483 (1942); Kallenberg v. Beth Is *367 rael Hospital, 45 A.D.2d 177 , 357 N.Y.S.2d 508 (1974); Jones v.

  17. Blondel v. Hays
    403 S.E.2d 340 Supreme Court of VirginiaApril 19, 1991

    United States, 368 F.2d 626, 632 (1966); Harvey v. Silber, 300 Mich. 510 , 2 N.W.2d 483, 488 (1942). Accord, Gardner v.

  18. 169 S.E.2d 563 Supreme Court of VirginiaSeptember 5, 1969

    United States, 368 F. 2d 626, 632 (1966); Harvey v. Silber, 300 Mich. 510 , 2 N. W. 2d 483, 488 (1942). Accord, Gardner v. National Bulk Carriers, Inc., 310 F. 2d 284 , 91 A.L.R. 2d 1023 (4th Cir. 1962), cert. denied, 372 U. S. 913 , 83 S.

  19. 580 A.2d 206 Court of Appeals of MarylandOctober 9, 1990

    U.S., 854 F.2d 881 (6th Cir.1988), and Harvey v. Silber, 300 Mich. 510 , 2 N.W.2d 483 (1942); Montana, Aasheim v. Humberger, 215 Mont. 127 , 695 P.2d 824 (1985); New Jersey, Evers v. Dollinger, 95 N.J. 399 , 471 A.2d 405 (1984); New York, Kallenberg v.

  20. 768 P.2d 534 Wyoming Supreme CourtJanuary 17, 1989

    Harvey v. Silber, 300 Mich. 510 , 2 N.W.2d 483 (1942). "Proximate cause here is implicit in the breach of duty. Indeed, the duty would be empty if it did not itself embrace the loss as a consequence of its breach." Gardner, supra, at page 287. Id. at 445.

  21. Clark v. Ross
    328 S.E.2d 91 Court of Appeals of South CarolinaMarch 6, 1985

    Harvey v. Silber, 300 Mich. 510 , 2 N. W. (2d) 483 (1942). [Emphasis theirs.] Clark was not required to establish to a certainty that Latreva would have lived had Dr.

  22. 54 Cal. App. 3d 521 California Court of AppealJanuary 20, 1976

    The following authorities appear to require the establishment of proximate cause by evidence of probability: Harvey v. Silber (1942), 300 Mich. 510 , 2 N.W.2d 483 ; Schuler v. Berger (1967), D.C., 275 F.Supp. 120 ; Walden v.

  23. Speed v. State
    240 N.W.2d 901 Supreme Court of IowaApril 14, 1976

    Harvey v. Silber, 300 Mich. 510, 520 , 2 N.W.2d 483, 487 (“[T]he jury could properly infer that [the defendant] would have operated if he had known the true position of the bullet.

  24. Vitale v. Reddy
    389 N.W.2d 456 Michigan Court of AppealsApril 8, 1986

    See Harvey v Silber, 300 Mich 510 ; 2 NW2d 483 (1942).

  25. 226 N.W.2d 569 Michigan Court of AppealsJanuary 9, 1975

    See *585 Harrison v Lorenz, 303 Mich 382 [ 6 NW2d 554 (1942)]; Valenti v Mayer, 301 Mich 551 [ 4 NW2d 5 (1942)]; Harvey v Silber, 300 Mich 510 [ 2 NW2d 483 (1942)]; and Gile v Hudnutt, 279 Mich 358 [ 272 NW 706 (1937)].

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list