TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Citing references

Opinions citing Parchefsky v. Kroll Bros., 196 N.E. 308 (N.Y. 1935)

80 citing cases

Negative treatment
Depth Newest Oldest Most cited
Majority opinions only
1 2–3 4–9 10+ times cited
  1. Kyte v. McMillion
    259 A.2d 532 Court of Appeals of MarylandDecember 9, 1969

    (See Matter of Parchefsky v. Kroll Bros., 267 N. Y. 410, 413-414 , 196 N. E. 308, 310-311 , 98 A.L.R. 1387 .)

  2. Firestein v. Kingsbrook Jewish Medical Center
    137 A.D.2d 34 Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New YorkMay 9, 1988

    The payment of compensation under the rule of the Parchefsky case (supra) is not dependent on whether the subsequent aggravation of the original injury occurred within the scope of the claimant’s employment.

  3. Claim of Meachem v. New York Central Railroad
    169 N.E.2d 913 New York Court of AppealsOctober 21, 1960 Dissent

    Kroll Bros., 267 N. Y. 410 : Matter of Zirpola v. T. & E. Casselman, Inc., 237 N. Y. 367, 373 ; Caulfield v. Elmhurst Contr. Co., 268 App. Div. 661, 664 , affd. 294 N. Y. 803 ; Employers Mut. Life Ins. Co. v.

  4. Bradshaw v. Iowa Methodist Hospital
    101 N.W.2d 167 Supreme Court of IowaFebruary 9, 1960

    Pritchard, 371 Ill. 36 , 20 N.E.2d 53, 57 ; Luongo’s Case, 313 Mass. 440 , 47 N.E.2d 938 ; Parchefsky v. Kroll Bros., 267 N. Y. 410 , 196 N.E. 308, 310 , 98 A. L. R. 1387, 1388; Baker v. Wycoff, 95 Utah 199 , 79 P.2d 77, 81 ; 99 C. J.

  5. Heaton v. Kerlan
    166 P.2d 857 California Supreme CourtMarch 14, 1946

    Associated Indemnity Corporation, supra, 19 Cal.App.2d 564 ; see Parchefsky v. Kroll Bros., Inc., 267 N.Y. 410, 417 [ 196 N.E. 308 , 98 A.L.R. 1387 ]; 27 Cal.Jur. 423.)

  6. Salonia v. Samsol Homes, Inc.
    119 A.D.2d 394 Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New YorkOctober 20, 1986

    Clare’s Hosp., supra, at p 83; Matter of Parchefsky v Kroll Bros., supra, at p 414; Musco v Conte, supra, at p 125 ).

  7. Shortridge v. Bede
    319 P.2d 277 Washington Supreme CourtDecember 12, 1957

    The New York court of appeals considered the common law in reaching its conclusion in In re Parchefsky v. Kroll Bros., Inc., 267 N.Y. 410 , 196 N.E. 308 , 98 A.L.R. 1387 (1935).

  8. Hill v. St. Clare's Hospital
    490 N.E.2d 823 New York Court of AppealsFebruary 19, 1986

    Bono has been determined to be responsible (Milks v McIver, 264 NY 267 ; see, Matter of Parchefsky v Kroll Bros., 267 NY 410 ; PJI 2:305) and St.

  9. Schumacher v. Leslie
    232 S.W.2d 913 Supreme Court of MissouriOctober 9, 1950

    Wycoff, 1938, 95 Utah 199 , 79 P.2d 77, 81 [2, 3, 14, 17]; Parchefsky v. Kroll Bros., 1935, 267 N.Y. 410 , 196 N.E. 308 , 98 A.L.R. 1387, 1389, 1391 ; Froid v. Knowles, 1934, 95 Colo. 223 , 36 P.2d 156, 157 [3]. [3] . McGough v. McCarthy Imp.

  10. Seaton v. United States Rubber Co.
    61 N.E.2d 177 Indiana Supreme CourtMay 29, 1945

    Wycoff (1938), 95 Utah 199 , 79 P. (2d) 77 ; Parchefsky v. Kroll Bros. (1935), 267 N. Y. 410 , 196 N. E. 308 , 98 *415 A. L. R 1387; Pawlak v Hayes (1916), 162 Wis. 503 , 156 N. W. 464 , L. R. A. 1917 A 392.

  11. Cimino v. Alway
    501 P.2d 447 Court of Appeals of ArizonaNovember 9, 1972

    (See Matter of Parchefsky v. Kroll Bros., 267 N.Y. 410, 413-414 , 196 N.E. 308, 310-311 , 98 A.L.R. 1387 .)

  12. Hanson v. Norton
    103 S.W.2d 1 Supreme Court of MissouriMarch 17, 1937

    (Mass.), 192 N.E. 608 ; Parchefsky v. Kroll Bros., 267 N.Y. 410 , 196 N.E. 308 ; Hoover v. Globe Indemnity Co. et al., 202 N.C. 655 , 163 S.E. 758 ; Polucha v. Landes, 60 N.D. 159 , 233 N.W. 264 ; Revell v.

  13. Smith v. Conn
    163 N.W.2d 407 Supreme Court of IowaDecember 10, 1968

    (See Matter of Parchefsky v. Kroll Bros., 267 N.Y. 410, 413-414 , 196 N.E. 308, 310-311 , 98 A.L.R. 1387 .)

  14. Lucas v. City of Juneau
    127 F. Supp. 730 D. AlaskaFebruary 1, 1955

    Parchefsky v. Kroll Bros., 267 N.Y. 410 , 196 N.E. 308, 310 , 98 A.L.R. 1387 .

  15. St. Clair v. Eastern Air Lines, Inc.
    302 F.2d 477 Second CircuitApril 24, 1962

    Parchefsky v. Kroll Brothers, Inc., 267 N.Y. 410 , 196 N.E. 308 , 98 A.L.R. 1387 (1935); 2 Harper & James, The-Law of Torts § 20.3 (1956).

  16. Scheideler v. H. F. Elias & Lutheran Hospital Society, Inc.
    309 N.W.2d 67 Nebraska Supreme CourtAugust 7, 1981

    (See Matter of Parchefsky v. Kroll Bros., 267 N.Y. 410, 413-414 , 196 N.E. 308, 310-311 , 98 A.L.R. 1387 .)

  17. Industrial Commission v. Standard Insurance Co.
    370 P.2d 156 Supreme Court of ColoradoApril 2, 1962

    Industrial Commission, 317 Ill. 302 , 148 N.E. 79 , 39 A.L.R. 1270 ; Parchefsky v. Kroll Bros., 267 N.Y. 410 , 196 N.E. 308 , 98 A.L.R. 1387 ; Vesel v. Jardine Min. Co., 110 Mont. 82 , 100 P. (2d) 75 ; Fitzpatrick v. Fidelity and Cas Co.

  18. Robison v. State
    263 A.D. 240 Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New YorkJanuary 7, 1942

    (Matter of Parchefsky v. Kroll Bros., Inc., 267 N. Y. 410 .)

  19. Sobotta v. Vogel
    194 N.W.2d 564 Michigan Court of AppealsNovember 22, 1971

    (See Matter of Parchefsky v. Kroll Bros., Inc. (1935), 267 NY 410, 413-414 , 196 NE 308, 310-311 , 98 ALR 1387 .)

  20. Fink v. Dimick
    179 F. Supp. 354 D. ConnecticutMay 28, 1959

    Parchefsky v. Kroll Bros. Inc., 1935, 267 N.Y. 410 , 196 N.E. 308 , 98 A.L.R. 1387 ; Hornetz v. Philadelphia & Reading Coal & Iron Co., 1923, 277 Pa. 41 , 120 A. 662 ; Vatalaro v. Thomas, 1928, 262 Mass. 383 , 160 N.E. 269 .

  21. Mitchell v. Peaslee
    63 A.2d 302 Supreme Judicial Court of MaineDecember 13, 1948

    E. 269 ; Parchefsky v. Kroll Bros., Inc., 267 N. Y. 410 ; 196 N. E. 308 ; 98 A. L. R. 1387.

  22. Kotler v. Monticello Hospital
    56 Misc. 2d 742 New York Supreme CourtMay 1, 1968

    Y. 267, 269-270 ; Matter of Parchefsky v. Kroll Bros., 267 N. Y. 410, 414 ; Derby v. Prewitt, 12 N Y 2d 100, 103; cf. Clark v. Halstead, 276 App. Div. 17 , 18), and that the law does not permit a double satisfaction for a single injury (Milks v.

  23. Hume v. American-West African Line, Inc.
    36 F. Supp. 880 S.D. New YorkFebruary 3, 1941

    It is expounded in Parchefsky v. Kroll Bros., 267 N.Y. 410 , 196 N.E. 308 , 98 A.L.R. 1387 . In that case a physician’s negligence aggravated the injury inflicted by an original tort feasor.

  24. Josephine A. St. Clair, as of the Estate of Harold W. St. Clair, Deceased, and v. Eastern Air Lines, Inc., and
    302 F.2d 477 Second CircuitApril 24, 1962

    Parchefsky v. Kroll Brothers, Inc., 267 N.Y. 410 , 196 N.E. 308 , 98 A.L.R. 1387 (1935); 2 Harper & James, The Law of Torts 20.3 (1956).

  25. Ravo v. Rogatnick
    514 N.E.2d 1104 New York Court of AppealsOctober 13, 1987

    Co., 18 NY2d 57, 66 ; Derby v Prewitt, 12 NY2d 100, 105 , supra; Matter of Parchefsky v Kroll Bros., 267 NY 410, 413 ).

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list