Citing references
Opinions citing Gosnell ex rel. Gosnell v. Southern Ry. Co., 162 S.E. 569 (N.C. 1932)
4 citing cases
-
14 S.E.2d 643 Supreme Court of North CarolinaMay 21, 1941
Hospital, supra; Gosnell v. R. R., 202 N. C., 234 , 162 S. E., 569 .
-
681 S.E.2d 405 Court of Appeals of North CarolinaAugust 18, 2009
Southern Railway Co., 202 N.C. 234, 236 , 162 S.E. 569, 570 (1932) (“[W]here an employer, in recognition of his legal or moral obligations to his employee, employs a physician or surgeon to render professional services to his employee, who is in need of such
-
196 So. 2d 179 District Court of Appeal of FloridaMarch 7, 1967
French Broad Hospital, Inc., 199 N.C. 314 , 154 S.E. 406 ; Gosnell v. Southern Ry. Co., 202 N.C. 234 ; 162 S.E. 569 ; Stewart v. Crook Sanatorium, 17 Tenn. App. 589 , 69 S.W.2d 259 ; Kuglich v. Fowle, 185 Wis. 124 , 200 N.W. 648 .
-
166 S.E. 285 Supreme Court of North CarolinaOctober 26, 1932
McClung , 201 N.C. 648 ; Gosnell v. R. R. , 202 N.C. 234 ; Byrd v. Hospital , 202 N.C. 337 . In Smith v. McClung, supra , at p. 651, Brogden, J. , says: "Hence, if the principle of res ipsa loquitur does not apply, the case should have been nonsuited. . . .